Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No sh*t !

 

They have had this as the goal since 12/7 they aren't "conducting an investigation"

 

Jan. 6 committee pushing Garland to prosecute Trump

 

How do we know? Because Democrats (plus two rogue Republicans) have begun calling on Attorney General Eric Garland to “do his job” and get ready to prosecute Donald Trump and anyone else who’s name can in any way be tied to the January 6, 2021 riot on Capitol Hill. How Garland is expected to do that at this stage of the game was not explained. (Associated Press)

 

What the committee has been relying on thus far is a lot of headlines without much underlying substance.

 

For example, this week some of the members cited a judge in California (a Clinton appointee) who wrote that it is “more than likely than not” that Donald Trump committed some sort of crime related to the January 6 events.

 

You’ll notice that no evidence is offered and no specific crime is specified. It’s not really even a suggestion that there is a charge available to file. It’s just “more likely than not.”

 

https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2022/04/02/jan-6-committee-pushing-garland-to-prosecute-trump-n459576

When the threshold of guilt of "beyond a reasonable doubt" is replaced by some 3rd world junta standard of "more than likely than not" we can convict anyone of anything.  This committee is a danger to freedom.  As are those supporting them.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I'm reading "Ivanka Trump Testifies to House Panel Investigating Jan. 6 Attack" in The New York Times.

 

Key sentence:

It was not immediately clear how revelatory her testimony was for the committee, but those familiar with the interview said Ms. Trump did not seek to invoke any privilege — such as executive privilege or the Fifth Amendment, as other witnesses have done — and broadly, if not garrulously, answered the panel’s questions.

 

And what's with "not immediately clear how revelatory"? It sounds like she testified simply and straightforwardly, but there was nothing interesting. Why act like later something might be revealed? It's such lame titillation. What was unclear?

 

What is the function of "if not garrulously"? It strikes me as vaguely sexist, as though you would expect her to chatter inanely.

 

Posted by Ann Althouse

 

https://althouse.blogspot.com/2022/04/if-ivanka-wasnt-garrulous-why-bring-up.html

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/05/us/politics/ivanka-trump-jan-6.html?smid=url-share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I'm reading "Ivanka Trump Testifies to House Panel Investigating Jan. 6 Attack" in The New York Times.

 

Key sentence:

It was not immediately clear how revelatory her testimony was for the committee, but those familiar with the interview said Ms. Trump did not seek to invoke any privilege — such as executive privilege or the Fifth Amendment, as other witnesses have done — and broadly, if not garrulously, answered the panel’s questions.

 

And what's with "not immediately clear how revelatory"? It sounds like she testified simply and straightforwardly, but there was nothing interesting. Why act like later something might be revealed? It's such lame titillation. What was unclear?

 

What is the function of "if not garrulously"? It strikes me as vaguely sexist, as though you would expect her to chatter inanely.

 

Posted by Ann Althouse

 

https://althouse.blogspot.com/2022/04/if-ivanka-wasnt-garrulous-why-bring-up.html

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/05/us/politics/ivanka-trump-jan-6.html?smid=url-share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Makes perfect sense, of course.  They can't really say much about the testimony, but they can assure their readers that the Wharton School of Business graduate known for speaking eloquently and articulately yammered on like a giddy schoolgirl in front of the panel looking to destroy her, her family, her father and their entire way of life.  

 

You would really get better coverage reading People magazine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

This acknowledgement of reality — that it’s not a crime to walk through a door held open for you by police — is fatal to the corrupt government’s entire J6 narrative.

 

It’s also why DOJ has criminally abused defendants to force plea deals: DOJ knows its cases are garbage.

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

Insurrection! Coup! 

 

***** off.

 

 

 


DR doing his best to distract from what Conald was really trying to accomplish:

 

An all out coup and assault on our republic.

 

Notice DR never actually comments on the real investigations? The ones involving all the players and crooks who surrounded Conald and enabled his plan to overthrow the government? 
 

Thats why DR created this thread.
 

This thread serves as a pathetic attempt to distract his lemmings from the most corrupt administration in our lifetime. 

 

Notice how the most powerful and successful POTUS of our lifetime - you know - that one term loser who lost the popular vote TWICE and was impeached TWICE always plays the victim?  This POS has manipulated his cult to lose all critical thinking capabilities and play victim to justify all his crooked ways - and his lemmings follow like good little terrorists.

 

This cult is so conditioned - so brainwashed - they bend over backwards defending this:

 

giphy.gif?cid=5e214886f1elboko0zwajlqkop

 

These idiots work themselves up so hard - just look at DRs opening - to convince THEMSELVES the lies they have been told are true

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


DR doing his best to distract from what Conald was really trying to accomplish:

 

An all out coup and assault on our republic.

 

Notice DR never actually comments on the real investigations? The ones involving all the players and crooks who surrounded Conald and enabled his plan to overthrow the government? 
 

Thats why DR created this thread.
 

This thread serves as a pathetic attempt to distract his lemmings from the most corrupt administration in our lifetime. 

 

Notice how the most powerful and successful POTUS of our lifetime - you know - that one term loser who lost the popular vote TWICE and was impeached TWICEl always plays the victim?  This POS has manipulated his cult to lose all critical thinking capabilities and play victim to justify all his crooked ways - and his lemmings follow like good little terrorists.

 

This cult is so conditioned- so brainwashed - they bend over backwards defending this:

 

giphy.gif?cid=5e214886f1elboko0zwajlqkop

 

These idiots work themselves up so hard - just look at DRs opening - to convince THEMSELVES the lies they have been told are true

 

 

You seemed to be the only one worked up, amigo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


DR doing his best to distract from what Conald was really trying to accomplish:

 

An all out coup and assault on our republic.

 

Notice DR never actually comments on the real investigations? The ones involving all the players and crooks who surrounded Conald and enabled his plan to overthrow the government? 
 

Thats why DR created this thread.
 

This thread serves as a pathetic attempt to distract his lemmings from the most corrupt administration in our lifetime. 

 

Notice how the most powerful and successful POTUS of our lifetime - you know - that one term loser who lost the popular vote TWICE and was impeached TWICEl always plays the victim?  This POS has manipulated his cult to lose all critical thinking capabilities and play victim to justify all his crooked ways - and his lemmings follow like good little terrorists.

 

This cult is so conditioned- so brainwashed - they bend over backwards defending this:

 

giphy.gif?cid=5e214886f1elboko0zwajlqkop

 

These idiots work themselves up so hard - just look at DRs opening - to convince THEMSELVES the lies they have been told are true

 

 

What’s your explanation for the lack of criminal charges against Trump?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...