B-Man Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 3 hours ago, Chris farley said: ITs just funny how they automatically respond with "Putins puppet" to anything less than blind support. The programming is hard to overcome. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 We're definitely saving democracy in Ukraine, their media behaves just like ours. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 21 Share Posted September 21 👆🤡 - Ah yes - Moscow Chay of course works for Russian state media outlet - RT. And look who recently interviewed Moscow Chay - Tara Reade - lmao - you can't make this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 https://x.com/schizointel/status/1704958891220434964?s=46&t=WfwBbfFkRiZZWCMxTdpkOw war crime? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 22 Author Share Posted September 22 VLADIMIR Putin's Black Sea fleet headquarters was blitzed by a fiery Ukrainian Storm Shadow missile attack today. Footage shows black smoke billowing from the burning and partially collapsed building in the Russian-held Crimean city of Sevastopol after Kyiv's latest assault on the peninsula. https://www.the-sun.com/news/9153595/explosions-putin-black-sea-crimea/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 (edited) 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: VLADIMIR Putin's Black Sea fleet headquarters was blitzed by a fiery Ukrainian Storm Shadow missile attack today. Footage shows black smoke billowing from the burning and partially collapsed building in the Russian-held Crimean city of Sevastopol after Kyiv's latest assault on the peninsula. https://www.the-sun.com/news/9153595/explosions-putin-black-sea-crimea/ Brit Storm Shadow missile Then we can give them some long-range missiles as well. and just hope Putin doesn't rain down supersonics on Kiev, again. "If you know others and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know others but know yourself, you win one and lose one; if you do not know others and do not know yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle" Edited September 22 by Chris farley 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 22 Author Share Posted September 22 Biden quietly smashing up Putin's fascist military. No bluster, no lies, no conspiracy garbage, just results Bye bye President Joe Biden has told his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that the United States will provide a small number of long-range missiles to aid the war with Russia, three U.S. officials and a congressional official familiar with the discussions told NBC News on Friday. The officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, did not say when the missiles would be delivered or when a public announcement would be made. For months, Ukraine has asked for the Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS, which would give Kyiv the ability to strike targets from as far away as about 180 miles, hitting supply lines, railways, and command and control locations behind the Russian front lines. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-ukraine-war-atacms-biden-zelenskyy-long-range-missile-rcna116876 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Biden quietly smashing up Putin's fascist military. No bluster, no lies, no conspiracy garbage, just results Bye bye President Joe Biden has told his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that the United States will provide a small number of long-range missiles to aid the war with Russia, three U.S. officials and a congressional official familiar with the discussions told NBC News on Friday. The officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, did not say when the missiles would be delivered or when a public announcement would be made. For months, Ukraine has asked for the Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS, which would give Kyiv the ability to strike targets from as far away as about 180 miles, hitting supply lines, railways, and command and control locations behind the Russian front lines. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-ukraine-war-atacms-biden-zelenskyy-long-range-missile-rcna116876 Heck yeah. escalation is awesome. for your stocks. not so much the people of Ukraine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 22 Author Share Posted September 22 The unhappy fascists LOL You ain't getting a dictatorship here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 US will send Ukraine ATACMS long-range missiles, Biden tells Zelenskiy: NBC Good news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 14 hours ago, ChiGoose said: US will send Ukraine ATACMS long-range missiles, Biden tells Zelenskiy: NBC Good news! And then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Great. We (poorly) ended one forever war just to fund another. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 23 Author Share Posted September 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 Rand Paul Issues Stark Warning To Biden, Senate, & House About Ukraine Funding' Rand Paul: "I rise to put the leadership of the house, the senate, and the POTUS on notice. I will not consent to any expedited passage of any spending bill that provides any more American aid to Ukraine. It's as if no one has noticed that we have no extra money to send to Ukraine. Our deficit this year will exceed 1.5 trillion dollars borrowing money from China to send it to Ukraine, makes no sense." "Ukraine is one of the most CORRUPT countries on the planet..." Watch 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: Rand Paul Issues Stark Warning To Biden, Senate, & House About Ukraine Funding' Rand Paul: "I rise to put the leadership of the house, the senate, and the POTUS on notice. I will not consent to any expedited passage of any spending bill that provides any more American aid to Ukraine. It's as if no one has noticed that we have no extra money to send to Ukraine. Our deficit this year will exceed 1.5 trillion dollars borrowing money from China to send it to Ukraine, makes no sense." "Ukraine is one of the most CORRUPT countries on the planet..." Watch why isn’t anyone asking why we haven’t forced Russia and Ukraine to the table to end this? It’s clear we are funding this proxy war, marching thousands of another countries people to die by throwing money at them. if you zoom out and look at it, it’s so ***** twisted 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 24 Author Share Posted September 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 (edited) 10 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: why isn’t anyone asking why we haven’t forced Russia and Ukraine to the table to end this? It’s clear we are funding this proxy war, marching thousands of another countries people to die by throwing money at them. if you zoom out and look at it, it’s so ***** twisted The few times there was any third party talk of negotiations. The media ignores it. The goal should always be peace. The war mongers want more carnage though. While they drink coffee and eat a warm breakfast this morning. Edited September 24 by Chris farley 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: I'm left wondering how Gary states Russians didn't care about Crimea before 2014 knowing that Crimea was part of Russia until Soviet Premier Kruschev, an ethnic Ukranian, issued a decree transfering it to Ukraine? Edited September 24 by All_Pro_Bills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 11 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: why isn’t anyone asking why we haven’t forced Russia and Ukraine to the table to end this? It’s clear we are funding this proxy war, marching thousands of another countries people to die by throwing money at them. if you zoom out and look at it, it’s so ***** twisted 37 minutes ago, Chris farley said: The few times there was any third party talk of negotiations. The media ignores it. The goal should always be peace. The war mongers want more carnage though. While they drink coffee and eat a warm breakfast this morning. The Economist says we must prepare for a forever war in Ukraine The latest edition of The Economist outlines what the next phase of the Ukraine war will look like. So here’s what you need to know about the future of the conflict — straight from the mouth of the Western agenda-setters themselves. The Economist starts out by finally acknowledging that the counteroffensive — which it has been hyping for months — has been a catastrophic failure: “Ukraine has liberated less than 0.25% of the territory that Russia occupied in June. The 1,000km front line has barely shifted”. This is what 40,000 Ukrainians died for (official estimate, so probably more). And what’s worse, this was entirely predictable ― and indeed had been predicted. Absolutely unconscionable. However, The Economist immediately goes on to say that: “Asking for a ceasefire or peace talks is pointless. Vladimir Putin shows no sign of wanting to negotiate and, even if he did, could not be trusted to stick to a deal. ... [A]ny ceasefire would simply be a pause to re-arm and get ready to attack again. If Ukrainians stop fighting, they could lose their country”. That’s interesting because it is Russia that, in the months and weeks leading up to the invasion, repeatedly looked for a diplomatic solution to avoid war, only to be systematically dismissed by the West (“Putin’s continuing commitment to a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis was ... evident”, writes historian Geoffrey Roberts in a study for the Journal of Military and Strategic Studies: jmss.org/article/view/7...) and it is Russia that, in the weeks following the invasion, engaged in several diplomatic initiatives that were systematically sabotaged by the West. As for using the ceasefire as a ploy to re-arm, well that’s exactly what Ukraine and the West have admitted to have used the Minsk agreements to do (unherd.com/thepost/were…) — so this seems like a classic case of projection at best. That said, it is true that reaching an agreement now is harder because Washington’s derailment of peace talks early in the war have allowed Russia to gain a tactical advantage which now makes a negotiated settlement much more difficult to achieve. On top of the fact that Russia has many more reasons for not trusting the West than vice versa. But that’s no excuse for the West to not even consider sitting down at the negotiating table, of course. So if there is no realistic basis to believe that Ukraine has the capacity to attain its stated strategic objective of reclaiming all (or any, at this point) Russian-controlled territories, as even The Economist admits, but peace (or even a ceasefire) is not an option — then what options are left? https://twitter.com/battleforeurope/status/1705206986290147533 Is this the world we want to live in? . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts