Jump to content

Hey guys, anyone up for some more good old fashioned covid fear porn? 😉


JaCrispy

Recommended Posts

  • JaCrispy changed the title to Hey guys, anyone up for some more covid fear porn? 😉


The corporate media reminds me of the movie The Truman Show...Every time Truman starts to figure out what’s really going on in the fake reality that’s been created around him, the fake news on the radio, or television, is right there to explain away his “strange” discovery, and make him think he’s crazy...🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • JaCrispy changed the title to Hey guys, anyone up for some more good old fashioned covid fear porn? 😉
13 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

The only thing I was unaware of is how much of the "News" is paid for by Pfizer. If I want only one opinion being broadcast I am gonna sponsor as much as possible.

Yup...that should tell us all we need to know about the integrity of our mainstream media and why they have an agenda to turn us against alternative remedies to Covid...our politicians are the same way- just PR billboards for Big Pharma...👍

 

Why do you think everyone is overly scared? Because that’s exactly how Pfizer wants it- so our government will keep buying their product...

 

Always remember- They never want this pandemic to end...so they need to buy off the media to keep us afraid...And it goes hand in hand with the social media censorship...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sundancer said:

We need more Covid threads bravo. 

I understand your point, but it’s important to show how the msm is bought and paid for by Big Pharma, and is purposely pushing fear propaganda to keep the pandemic going...👍

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a discussion in the Shoutbox weeks ago about how Merck advised against using ivermectin for Wuhan virus and the posters were saying how much it said that Merck was disavowing its own product (when it came to Wuhan virus).  Not knowing/realizing that Merck is trying to market a treatment (molnupiravir) for Wuhan virus which will be significantly more expensive ($700 for a course versus $.54).

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Doc said:

There was a discussion in the Shoutbox weeks ago about how Merck advised against using ivermectin for Wuhan virus and the posters were saying how much it said that Merck was disavowing its own product (when it came to Wuhan virus).  Not knowing/realizing that Merck is trying to market a treatment (molnupiravir) for Wuhan virus which will be significantly more expensive ($700 for a course versus $.54).

I’m telling ya, man...the longer this thing plays out, the more this charade seems to be coming into focus...

 

For me, it all started when the government/Fauci claimed they wanted to achieve herd immunity- but didn’t care about natural immunity...that was the clincher for me, that it wasn’t about curing covid, but rather prolonging it...

 

The endless need for vaccines, along with staying in a “government emergency state” was ideal for the executive branch would never need congress to get anything passed...

 

However, I don’t think the administration anticipated the blow back from the public once they started becoming hip to what was going on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Governor said:

How would I know? Why would someone click on that? It’s YouTube.

You would know because he is reading and commenting on public studies and reports- the same stuff that Sanje Gupta seemed to know nothing about on Joe Rogan...

 

MSM doesn’t report on them because Big Pharma pays their bills...that’s why we have to dig for it, ourselves...

 

The news on Youtube isn’t perfect, but neither is CNN, MSNBC, or FOX...but at least YouTube shows are independent...

 

But don’t just take my word for it...try watching some for yourself...see what you think...

Edited by JaCrispy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...