BillStime Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 🎯   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 (edited) Just trying to push this to 100 pages … Kinky Boots Ron strikes me as smart enough to tack hard to the center as soon as Trump is out of his way. If that happens…. Can’t wait for Trump to start spilling the dirt on Ronnie. Should be fun. Edited November 9, 2022 by The Frankish Reich 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 (edited) 47 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Just trying to push this to 100 pages … Kinky Boots Ron strikes me as smart enough to tack hard to the center as soon as Trump is out of his way. If that happens…. Can’t wait for Trump to start spilling the dirt on Ronnie. Should be fun. Here is my disconnect for RD....I listened to his victory speech....He used the word "woke" enough times to show that seems to be his primary message...really? This is what America...from a Presidential level...needs to focus on? Wokeness?....He seems like a band with one great song that opens and closes with it...He is infatuated with wokeness.  Edited November 9, 2022 by TH3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 50 minutes ago, TH3 said: Here is my disconnect for RD....I listened to his victory speech....He used the word "woke" enough times to show that seems to be his primary message...really? This is what America...from a Presidential level...needs to focus on? Wokeness?....He seems like a band with one great song that opens and closes with it...He is infatuated with wokeness.  You’re right. Weird to you and to me. But I think he knows his audience extremely well, and his first order of business is to get enough of that Trump culture war base over to his side. And they eat this stuff up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 8 hours ago, BillStime said: DeNazi   The Don’t Say Gay bich will be soundly defeated - count on it You keep mentioning this don’t say gay and I can’t find the details on it. Can you explain exactly what this means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 Ffs   We thank you for your service Lockdown Don.  Time to move on.    That said - maybe having you close for DeSantis to completely distinguish himself from (the nonsense like this that turns off votes we need) is for the best.   Everything is on the table.   I’m excited and horrified at the same time.   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: Are you trying to prove your ignorance and state you think "Separation of Church and State" is in the Constitution? Or that choosing moral people is establishing a religion?  Establishment clause of First Amendment often interpreted to require separation of church and state For approximately the first 150 years of the country’s existence, there was little debate over the meaning of this clause in the Constitution. As the citizenry became more diverse, however, challenges arose to existing laws and practices, and eventually, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the meaning of the establishment clause. Though not explicitly stated in the First Amendment, the clause is often interpreted to mean that the Constitution requires the separation of church and state.  Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Edited November 9, 2022 by nedboy7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 1 minute ago, nedboy7 said:  Establishment clause of First Amendment often interpreted to require separation of church and state For approximately the first 150 years of the country’s existence, there was little debate over the meaning of this clause in the Constitution. As the citizenry became more diverse, however, challenges arose to existing laws and practices, and eventually, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the meaning of the establishment clause. Though not explicitly stated in the First Amendment, the clause is often interpreted to mean that the Constitution requires the separation of church and state. Often interpreted does not equal meaning. You did not even source it, and I am quite sure you have no clue where the phrase "separation of church and state" because if you did you would not use it this way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: Often interpreted does not equal meaning. You did not even source it, and I am quite sure you have no clue where the phrase "separation of church and state" because if you did you would not use it this way.  I am afraid you might be the ignorant one.  Did you read this part?  Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Edited November 10, 2022 by nedboy7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 8 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:  I am afraid you might be the ignorant one.  Did you read this part?  Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Two points since you are clearly flailing and dishonest- that entire paragraph was missing. Secondly, what religion does not promote having children? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 (edited) Everyone gather around .. Trump is committing seppuku on Truth Social tonight   Edited November 10, 2022 by SCBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 23 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: Secondly, what religion does not promote having children? OK, that's weird. It's ok to be anti-abortion/anti-birth control because a lot of religions encourage procreation? And there were the Shakers, but that's a big reason why they died out. 13 minutes ago, SCBills said: Everyone gather around .. Trump is committing seppuku on Truth Social tonight   Poor Donny feeling rather irrelevant ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 1 hour ago, SCBills said: Everyone gather around .. Trump is committing seppuku on Truth Social tonight     Omg.  Dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 Trump wants to go down in flames because he knows he can’t win anymore…what a loser… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 Desantis is starting to look like the republican Obama. a good leader well liked across the aisle, charismatic…Rather than battle trumps ego maybe he should stick to Florida until Donnie dies off or goes to jail so he doesn’t blow his shot. 3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Trump wants to go down in flames because he knows he can’t win anymore…what a loser… In hindsight I bet the Rs wish they indicted him Mitt was right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Desantis is starting to look like the republican Obama. a good leader well liked across the aisle, charismatic…Rather than battle trumps ego maybe he should stick to Florida until Donnie dies off or goes to jail so he doesn’t blow his shot. If DeSantis can stay above the fray, it will just make Trump look worse- and he will lose all his supporters…Just don’t play Trump’s game and Ron will be fine… 4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Desantis is starting to look like the republican Obama. a good leader well liked across the aisle, charismatic…Rather than battle trumps ego maybe he should stick to Florida until Donnie dies off or goes to jail so he doesn’t blow his shot. In hindsight I bet the Rs wish they indicted him Mitt was right I’m starting to hope he gets convicted on one of his many lawsuits… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said: OK, that's weird. It's ok to be anti-abortion/anti-birth control because a lot of religions encourage procreation? And there were the Shakers, but that's a big reason why they died out. Poor Donny feeling rather irrelevant ... Huh? I’m sorry, but I’ve never seen abortion as a religious issue. It’s a shared morality issue. You don’t have to believe in a specific deity to hold that voluntarily terminating a new life in the womb, is something to be avoided at most, if not all costs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 Why DeNazi has NO chance in hell… this is sick AF.  Nothing like sexualizing these kids, right @Brueggs? @BillsFanNC @Commsvet11?  The young vote will destroy him….  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commsvet11 Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Why DeNazi has NO chance in hell… this is sick AF.  Nothing like sexualizing these kids, right @Brueggs? @BillsFanNC @Commsvet11?  The young vote will destroy him….  Why don’t you go ahead and explain how this is sexualizing children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts