Derek Chauvin Trial

[Tiberius]

16 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Zero evidence that race had anything to do with the actions of Chauvin. 

But a racist juror sure could help the defendants cause 

[Boatdrinks]

Just now, Tiberius said:

But a racist juror sure could help the defendants cause 

An impartial juror could help, but it’s doubtful any of them aren’t already tainted. 

[RiotAct]

4 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

An impartial juror could help, but it’s doubtful any of them aren’t already tainted. 

this reminds me of an episode of Hawaii Five-O that I watched the other night.

 

McGarrett had to figure out which of the jurors was tainted by the (wealthy, well-connected) defendant.... but it turned out to be the bailiff!!!!

[Tiberius]

5 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

An impartial juror could help, but it’s doubtful any of them aren’t already tainted. 

Tainted by the horror of watching Officer Chauvin actions, ya 

++++

 

The defense attorney playing Floyd calling for his mother. That does not seem like a good strategy 

[Boatdrinks]

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Tainted by the horror of watching Officer Chauvin actions, ya 

++++

 

The defense attorney playing Floyd calling for his mother. That does not seem like a good strategy 

One cannot be tainted by the evidence: it ALL must be considered. Rather , the jurors are tainted through the lack of sequestration and the city of Minneapolis paying money out in a settlement before the trial. Strong action should have been taken to lessen or eliminate or greatly reduce effect from that. It wasn’t. 

[Tiberius]

5 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

One cannot be tainted by the evidence: it ALL must be considered. Rather , the jurors are tainted through the lack of sequestration and the city of Minneapolis paying money out in a settlement before the trial. Strong action should have been taken to lessen or eliminate or greatly reduce effect from that. It wasn’t. 

Jurors can raise above that. Reasonable people do. Better than in 92 when they changed venues to a place outside the place it happened. 

[Unforgiven]

10 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

One cannot be tainted by the evidence: it ALL must be considered. Rather , the jurors are tainted through the lack of sequestration and the city of Minneapolis paying money out in a settlement before the trial. Strong action should have been taken to lessen or eliminate or greatly reduce effect from that. It wasn’t. 

Don't forget about the threat of violence from the left

Mad maxine coming for ya 

Speaking of raysis maxi...

lololololololol

Edited April 19, 2021 by Unforgiven

[Boatdrinks]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Jurors can raise above that. Reasonable people do. Better than in 92 when they changed venues to a place outside the place it happened. 

The power of the liberal media is huge. They’ve effectively reduced the National IQ in a huge way. Venue should probably have been changed in this case. 

[Tiberius]

2 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Don't forget about the threat of violence from the left

Mad maxine coming for ya 

The violence is from the right. Insurrections, massacres of churches, synagogues and stores. 

Just now, Boatdrinks said:

The power of the liberal media is huge. They’ve effectively reduced the National IQ in a huge way. Venue should probably have been changed in this case. 

So glad the venue wasn't changed 

[Boatdrinks]

Just now, Tiberius said:

The violence is from the right. Insurrections, massacres of churches, synagogues and stores. 

It’s from the left. Entire cities are burned and lawlessness runs amok to the delight of liberal Dems drunk on their power. 

[B-Man]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

The violence is from the right. Insurrections, massacres of churches, synagogues and stores. 

 

Lie.

 

 

And the Chauvin trial thread the violence is the LEFT.

 

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Everyone get ready for middle class white, suburban socialists and anarchists to ride into urban cities and burn down black communities...

Actual text message between wh-anarchists:

 

mt @ strbx lode up b4 we go

 

y? I wl get sumpin dare 

 

no kan do. burnt lst sumer. 
 

dis is bl sht im out

[Motorin']

Just now, B-Man said:

 

Lie.

 

 

And the Chauvin trial thread the violence is the LEFT.

 

 

 

 

Says the biggest cheerleader for the argument that what Chauvin did is perfectly legal.

[T&C]

Nelson is sure putting out a compelling final argument. Its been awhile since I've been able to track a trial like this... last one was Casey Anthony I believe.

[Unforgiven]

 

 

\

Chauvin used to live here...imagine what they would do to jurists who didn't

give the outcome they demand...

[B-Man]

15 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Says the biggest cheerleader for the argument that what Chauvin did is perfectly legal.

 

Nope...............haven't said that once.

 

I posted some defendant leaning posts because no one else was.

 

In fact the only time I posted my thoughts on this was.

 

On 4/9/2021 at 5:01 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

and no,

 

this does not mean that Officer Chauvin shouldn't receive some punishment.

 

It is to counterbalance those on PPP who are gleefully calling the trial a rout.

 

You need to read multiple sources.

 

 

 

 

But just keep motorin down the wrong path....

 

 

 

[Unforgiven]

26 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The violence is from the right. Insurrections, massacres of churches, synagogues and stores. 

So glad the venue wasn't changed 

 the right, lol. lay off the tide pods liar.

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

4 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Everyone get ready for middle class white, suburban socialists and anarchists to ride into urban cities and burn down black communities...

And that’s why woke is a joke. 

[Motorin']

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Nope...............haven't said that once.

 

I posted some defendant leaning posts because no one else was.

 

In fact the only time I posted my thoughts on this was.

 

 

 

But just keep motorin down the wrong path....

 

 

 

 

And the right path is to give the benefit of the doubt to a sadistic argument? I said in this thread that the defense attorney did as good a job as someone in his position could do. But to buy into Chauvin's innocence, you must believe that there is a world where kneeling on someone's neck for 2 minutes after they have no pulse is OK. 

 

Everything else is missing the forest for the trees, at best.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

And the right path is to give the benefit of the doubt to a sadistic argument? I said in this thread that the defense attorney did as good a job as someone in his position could do. But to buy into Chauvin's innocence, you must believe that there is a world where kneeling on someone's neck for 2 minutes after they have no pulse is OK. 

 

Everything else is missing the forest for the trees, at best.

You lost me here.  The “right path” is giving the benefit of the doubt to sadism?  
 

Isn’t the right path the right path?  
 

Why would we (societally speaking) actively cheer for the wrong path?   Isn’t that the path best described as  ‘string em up?”.  
 

I actually think following the right path is the entire &$&$ing forest, as difficult, painful and fraught with hypocrisy (again, societally speaking) as that can be at times.