Jump to content

Updated cap is $182.5 million


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Gregthekeg said:

Doesnt a team usually need around 10 Million to sign the draft class and UDFA? Expect some moves soon. 

That is always the figure i was used to hearing however Gregg Thompsett (Cover 1 Buffalo podcast) did a good job of explaining it in more detail recently.  The figure required is actually much lower than that.  I cant remember exactly but I think less than $3m against the cap due to most of the draft class being at the lower end of the salary scale and not counting against the cap. (EDIT: The rule of 51 as explained more elegantly by YattaOkasan below)

 

Edited by NI Bills Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gregthekeg said:

Doesnt a team usually need around 10 Million to sign the draft class and UDFA? Expect some moves soon. 

No rule of 51.  It might look like 10million but only the top 51 salaries count against the cap for now (53 later obviously).  When you sign a draftee if they make more than the 51st player than you bump them off the list.  However, the affect to the cap is just the difference between the draftee cap number and the 51st players cap number (since that player was counting previously).  When you consider the price of later round draft picks relative to vet minimums those picks cost like nothing to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Reed83HOF changed the title to Updated cap is $182.5 million

Now the question is what does Beane and McDermott do? You can probably eliminate 1 DT with the return of Star, Jefferson or Butler. So Bills sit around $10 million in space without losing much. 

 

Many different ways the Bills can go to create space. They can create nearly $50 million pretty easily. But will they? 

 

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stosh64 said:

This is a pathetic move by the NFL...

It’s what they are contractually obliged to do.  While it’s true that the league could increase that amount if they wanted to, there’s little reason for them to do so as it would cut into their profits and upset the large number of teams who are in good cap shape.  Also the NFLPA would not agree to borrowing from future caps.  I do not blame them for that as doing so would likely decrease overall spending slightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

It’s what they are contractually obliged to do.  While it’s true that the league could increase that amount if they wanted to, there’s little reason for them to do so as it would cut into their profits and upset the large number of teams who are in good cap shape.  Also the NFLPA would not agree to borrowing from future caps.  I do not blame them for that as doing so would likely decrease overall spending slightly.


 

You are correct - except the NFLPA was all for borrowing against future cap - spreading it out over 10 years - the owners were not willing to do so.

 

Basically the higher the cap and the more years it was spread out was money out of the owners pocket - interest free.  The owners wanted the cap lower and any future cap impacts limited to 1-2 years.  As it is - the cap at 182.5 rather than the 160 or so the NFL/NFLPA agreement calls for - is over half a billion dollars extra the players get now that is offset over the next 2 years.  That is a lot of money the owners are putting out without the offset capital guaranteed to return.

24 minutes ago, stosh64 said:

This is a pathetic move by the NFL...


 

This is a ridiculous take as the cap really should be 20 million lower - it was a sound agreement between the parties.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Reed83HOF said:

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/03/09/salary-cap-likely-to-be-no-more-than-183-million/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

As one source with knowledge of the dynamics has explained it to PFT, the fact that the franchise-tag deadline wasn’t extended by the league and the union can be interpreted as an indication that the cap won’t significantly exceed the $180 million floor. Per the source, the cap will at most be $183 million.

 

 

 

yea slick little title change there bud...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...