Commsvet11 Posted September 20 Posted September 20 3 minutes ago, Homelander said: What a saint. SPAM! 1
Homelander Posted September 20 Posted September 20 Ah yes, honor the insurrection cosplay crowd, but not the cops who actually bled that day. Classic MAGA.
All_Pro_Bills Posted Friday at 12:09 PM Posted Friday at 12:09 PM 9 hours ago, Homelander said: So if this claim of "evidence" was valid and demonstrated violation of the law explain why the DOJ didn't file charges against Trump and his inner circle while Garland was AG? Maybe because what is called "obstruction" by this Dem account was procedural actions within and allowed by the law? And calling an on-the-record meeting a conspiracy by definition invaldates the use of the word. Because conspiracies by design are secret. That could be it, right? 1
JFKjr Posted Friday at 04:26 PM Posted Friday at 04:26 PM There's a lead on the identity of the J6 "Pipe Bomber." It is believed to be a woman. 1
Homelander Posted Friday at 05:36 PM Posted Friday at 05:36 PM 5 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: So if this claim of "evidence" was valid and demonstrated violation of the law explain why the DOJ didn't file charges against Trump and his inner circle while Garland was AG? Maybe because what is called "obstruction" by this Dem account was procedural actions within and allowed by the law? And calling an on-the-record meeting a conspiracy by definition invaldates the use of the word. Because conspiracies by design are secret. That could be it, right? Garland should have moved faster but once Jack Smith took over, DOJ filed two major indictments: one in DC (election obstruction) and one in Florida (classified docs). Trump was charged with 4 felonies including conspiracy and obstruction. Conspiracies don’t need to be secret just an agreement to break the law.
Homelander Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Never, ever vote for MAGA republicans, right @leh-nerd skin-erd? Corrupt AF
Recommended Posts