Jump to content

Fraud or no fraud? that is the question...


JaCrispy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, JaCrispy said:


If there was a transfer of the USB card, like the video creator suggests, how would that necessarily mean there was fraud?

All of this crap is just so ridiculous and pointless even if and I stress if the Dominion voting machines had it out for Trump it wouldn't matter. They did a hand paper ballot audit and he still lost. I mean the counts line up which clearly indicates that the computers didn't screw him over.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Scraps said:

 

Exactly how is Dominion unreliable?  It produces a paper ballot that can and has been audited.  There have been 3 counts, one of which was a hand recount, and they are all consistent.  Trump has lost 3 times.

No they have not been consistent. Look it up if you're really interested in finding out. It's not hard to find. Way too many sketchy ***** happened after the swing states supposedly stopped counting.

 

The left fell for the Russian collusion with no evidence at all, but ignore the fraud that's been going on since the election.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

All of this crap is just so ridiculous and pointless even if and I stress if the Dominion voting machines had it out for Trump it wouldn't matter. They did a hand paper ballot audit and he still lost. I mean the counts line up which clearly indicates that the computers didn't screw him over.

This seems like a legit argument...Do you know if the Trump campaign has attempted to counter this point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Bidens_basement said:

No they have not been consistent. Look it up if you're really interested in finding out. It's not hard to find. Way too many sketchy ***** happened after the swing states supposedly stopped counting.

 

The left fell for the Russian collusion with no evidence at all, but ignore the fraud that's been going on since the election.  

 

If the Georgia recounts are inconsistent, you provide the proof.  Trump lost Georgia 3 times.

Edited by Scraps
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

This seems like a legit argument...Do you know if the Trump campaign has attempted to counter this point?

 

No,  They know that many of his followers live in the hermetically sealed Fox/OAN/Newsmax/Trump circular reinforcement loop and don't believe anything outside of that circle.  They just keep deceiving so they can keep grifting.  Do you know that you have to give $5001 to the recount fund he has been touting before $1 goes to the actual recount?  The rest goes to a Super Pac for him, to retire his campaign's debt and to the RNC.  This is nothing but a con by the conman in chief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

This seems like a legit argument...Do you know if the Trump campaign has attempted to counter this point?

They called it a joke and moved the Goalposts. Said that what they really needed to verify was the signature matching from the mail in votes which they did when they got them and are literally incapable of matching back up with their votes again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JaCrispy said:


If there was a transfer of the USB card, like the video creator suggests, how would that necessarily mean there was fraud?

 

Get off youtube, dude.

 

And if you are going to keep posting every nonsensical, half-brained conspiracy video that pops up there, you're probably better suited for the other board.

 

No fraud. Georgia just RE-certified AGAIN today after ANOTHER hand recount. Trump has now lost GA 3 times. And I love being a part of it.

 

On to the run-offs. Early voting starts Monday.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Get off youtube, dude.

 

And if you are going to keep posting every nonsensical, half-brained conspiracy video that pops up there, you're probably better suited for the other board.

 

No fraud. Georgia just RE-certified AGAIN today after ANOTHER hand recount. Trump has now lost GA 3 times. And I love being a part of it.

 

On to the run-offs. Early voting starts Monday.

So if Biden has won Georgia 3 times now that means he gets 48 EC votes now right.😃

Edited by Warcodered
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Scraps said:

 

If the Georgia recounts are inconsistent, you provide the proof.  Trump lost Georgia 3 times.

Why are you against making sure there was no fraud committed? You were gung ho over the fake Russian collusion, but now, all of a sudden the election was legit? There are thousands of poll workers who were sworn under oath, videos of counting ballots after they supposedly stopped counting. 

This whole election has been crooked as hell. But hey, screw the country as long as your side wins.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldmanfan said:

None of this happened according to the people in charge.  Enough is enough of these conspiracy theories.

You never trust the people in charge in any organization* when they say “No, we didn’t $&@$ up.”.  We don’t allow it for Bernie Madhoff, we don’t allow it in criminal trials, and the right to adjudicate it in court is granted in the constitution even if it makes some people squishy in the shorts. 
 

*I’m speaking generally of course.  We all know that creepy dudes jamming their package while going over boob/over sweater is perfectly acceptable so long as the creeper follows certain political ideaology and “owns” it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bidens_basement said:

It will. It's too important to our nation not too.

 

Actually, it would be a farce for anything other than the 1 suit about Pennsylvania receiving and counting votes after election day made it to the Supreme Court.  Team Trump hasn't provided evidence that would overturn any state, let alone multiple states.  And as for the 1 case in Pennsylvania, that wouldn't change the results either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

It wont. The SCOTUS doesnt make a habit of hearing "cases" that are nothing more than flailing from a whiny narcissist with zero real evidence.

We'll see soon enough. 

Just now, Scraps said:

 

Actually, it would be a farce for anything other than the 1 suit about Pennsylvania receiving and counting votes after election day made it to the Supreme Court.  Team Trump hasn't provided evidence that would overturn any state, let alone multiple states.  And as for the 1 case in Pennsylvania, that wouldn't change the results either.

You have no clue what evidence they have or not have.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

Yeah we've been doing that this is the result so far.

 

There are not 47 Trump cases, Ricky ######o.  Why you let people lie to you is beyond me. 
 

All I ask for is patience as we see it through.  Where is the downside? 
 

 

Shocking— the filter edited out a legal surname. Re Tar Do

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bidens_basement said:

Why are you against making sure there was no fraud committed? You were gung ho over the fake Russian collusion, but now, all of a sudden the election was legit? There are thousands of poll workers who were sworn under oath, videos of counting ballots after they supposedly stopped counting. 

This whole election has been crooked as hell. But hey, screw the country as long as your side wins.

 

Its funny how whatever Team Trump is accusing you of is exactly what they are trying to do themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...