Jump to content

Bills best in league on 4th down “go for it” situations


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

So when they should go for it, they kick and it works out... I think that’s what this means

 

 

The opposite. When they should go for it, they do. Saints cost themselves most in the NFL by kicking it when they shouldn't.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FireChans said:

The opposite. When they should go for it, they do. Saints cost themselves most in the NFL by kicking it when they shouldn't.

 

 

Yeah, this.

 

Not surprising, really. Look at how many 4th and ones we've seen an Allen sneak be successful.

 

Look at the top of the chart, "Expected win probability lost by kicking in go situations."

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we sure "kicking" means punting? Maybe it means kicking the field goal instead. At least this season, I don't recall lamenting a punt at the 35-yard line or whatever, but Bass has attempted some very long field goals--and made most of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a few who have responded are misunderstanding this graph.

 

Basically, it means the Bills’ 4th down decision making — when to kick, when to go for it — is excellent.

 

This absolutely IS an important statistic. It  speaks to the evolution and adaptability of coach McDermott, who has often been criticized for game day decision making.
 

This graph — like the Bills becoming one of the pass happiest teams in the league — shows that McDermott has improved in multiple areas, embraces analytics, and is one of the sharpest, most “modern” coaches in the NFL.

 

*edit: to that end, the thread title is maybe slightly misleading?

Edited by Logic
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jumpsuit Jim said:

So being at the extreme end of a graph is either a good thing or a bad thing which has either a major impact or a minor impact on the outcome of a game. 
 

Got it. 

Graph-shaming dude, really, in 2020?   
 

I think it’s pretty obvious what the graph reveals about....football...and teams that play football..professionally...vis a vis fourth down situational analytics.  
 

In summary, algorithms.  Don’t bother asking me to explain further, I’m pretty upset right now. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

So when they should go for it, they kick and it works out... I think that’s what this means

 

 

 

No what it says is the Bills are best at making decisions to go for it when they should and kick when they should based on his statistical models. This is a good thing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, matter2003 said:

 

No what it says is the Bills are best at making decisions to go for it when they should and kick when they should based on his statistical models. This is a good thing.

So I’m guessing that the Jets are so bad that the right decision is simply to punt on pretty much EVERY fourth down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

I think you have this backwards

In what way 

36 minutes ago, Logic said:

I think a few who have responded are misunderstanding this graph.

 

Basically, it means the Bills’ 4th down decision making — when to kick, when to go for it — is excellent.

 

This absolutely IS an important statistic. It  speaks to the evolution and adaptability of coach McDermott, who has often been criticized for game day decision making.
 

This graph — like the Bills becoming one of the pass happiest teams in the league — shows that McDermott has improved in multiple areas, embraces analytics, and is one of the sharpest, most “modern” coaches in the NFL.

 

*edit: to that end, the thread title is maybe slightly misleading?

Yes I’m sure it’s misleading Because the stat is confusing 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

In what way 

 

The graph illustrates that the Bills aren’t costing themselves by kicking when they should be going for it on 4th down instead.
 

It does NOT illustrate that they are kicking when they should be going for it, which is what the thread title indicates.

 

Basically, the graph measures how good the 4th down decision making for each team is. The Bills are great at it. That’s it.
 

*edit: it’s admittedly a strangely worded and somewhat confusing Tweet.

Edited by Logic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Logic said:

 

The graph illustrates that the Bills aren’t costing themselves by kicking when they should be going for it on 4th down instead.
 

It does NOT illustrate that they are kicking when they should be going for it, which is what the threat title indicates.

 

Basically, the graph measures how good the 4th down decision making for each team is. The Bills are great at it. That’s it.

I just went by what the tweet said 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...