Jump to content

Should Steve Tasker be in the Hall of Fame?


Recommended Posts

I think ‘specialists’ are appropriately devalued, otherwise where does it end. 
 

Greatest Long snapper of all time?

 

he was a oddly great gunner, and a very forgettable WR.  But he wasn’t a transcendent leader or media personality as a player. 
 

As an overall football player, he wasn’t an all time great. 
 

I just don’t see anyone outside of Bills fans making or buying an argument for his induction. 
 

plus the induction process is pretty democratic so... yeah his current status It what is ‘should be’.

 

to paraphrase you are what the voters say you are. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and zero questions or doubts about it! 
He was a force on special teams and dominated his position like no other. I saw a stat from a previous poster that he won 9 games with his play, but he affected so many more by teams fair catching and designed returns away from him. If you game plan for a player over and over on special teams like him , then yes you effect the game for your team ! He was the best I ever saw and still is today! I hope he makes it so he and all of his teammates and us fans can celebrate and it’s not something that takes longer than necessary 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

Yes.  He revolutionized the importance of special teams.

 

Agreed.  And he also reinvented that role.

 

To win a SB, they always say you have to have all 3 phases.  Why do defensive and offensive players get all the recognition, but that vital 3rd phase is left out in the cold?

 

Absolutely Tasker should be in the HOF.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, JetsFan20 said:

What are your thoughts? You can certainly make an argument for him, but I think it’s hard to include him. That era in Bills football already has a ton of HOF representation. 

 

Just because an era has a ton of representation is not a reason on it's own to rule him out. He was the best at his position for a long time. Is special teams an integral part of winning and losing? Yes.So I say he does belong in the HOF. IMHO

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These takes are interesting:

 

What will hurt Tasker moving forward is that special teams is being de-emphasized in today’s NFL. I disagree with Matthew Slater as a HOF player for that reason. 
 

Here is a question:

 

If Tasker wasn’t on those great Bills teams would anyone consider him a HOFer? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I get the impression that most who say he does not belong, are probably too young to have really seen him play. Their commentary is usually just snarky, and without substance...we all know he isn't the greatest broadcaster, but that seems to cloud the opinion as to whether he belongs in the HOF.  Turn on an NFL football broadcast any Sunday during the season, and you will be listening to the analysis of once great players, who are terrible broadcasters.  Broadcasting quality is irrelevant.  When Tasker was playing, he wasn't just a Bills "fan favorite", he was highly known and regarded across the league, even to casual fans.  

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about it more.  How many great special teams players could cover punts and kickoffs, return punts and kickoffs, block punts, and recover on sides kicks.  He was exceptional and should be recognized for it.  He was a great slot receiver as well.  He would have helped in SB XXV as a receiver (Beebe was out) but they didn’t know what they had yet.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2020 at 3:03 AM, Peace Frog said:

I would but not before some other STers on this list.  (Note: this list is not updated.)  https://www.stadiumtalk.com/s/best-special-teams-players-nfl-history-c8f50eef62574034

I'm surprised that Mark Pike was not on that list, seriously. Blocking Pike was like standing in front of a freight train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

Think about it more.  How many great special teams players could cover punts and kickoffs, return punts and kickoffs, block punts, and recover on sides kicks.  He was exceptional and should be recognized for it.  He was a great slot receiver as well.  He would have helped in SB XXV as a receiver (Beebe was out) but they didn’t know what they had yet.  

I don't ever recall Tasker being an impressive kick off/punt return specialist except for a fluky play against the Raiders in the playoffs.   I hardly remember him returning kicks or punts at all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SMAKCruiser said:

I don't ever recall Tasker being an impressive kick off/punt return specialist except for a fluky play against the Raiders in the playoffs.   I hardly remember him returning kicks or punts at all...

Mostly known for kick coverage.  He returned 44 kickoffs, mostly in his early career, and he returned 32 punts in the last few years of his career.  My point is that on special teams he did whatever was needed.  

Edited by Bob in STL
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the 346 Hall of Fame members, only 4 have made it in primarily for their special teams play: Lou Groza, Jan Stenerud, Morten Anderson, and Ray Guy. 3 kickers and 1 punter. No returners and no gunners. There are 26 head coaches and 26 contributors who were elected not for their play on the field. Is it then reasonable to so willfully exclude special teamers from Hall of Fame conversations? Excluding all of those players who regularly made significant impacts on the outcomes of every game played?

 

Steve Tasker was the greatest gunner in NFL history. He singlehandedly decided multiple important games and heavily influenced many more on one of the best dynasties the AFC/AFL had ever seen. It doesn’t even matter if the NFL were to completely ban special teams beginning today. You can’t tell the full story of the professional game without including the absolute greatest of the great talents on what was at least once considered a full third of the game. I assume the HOF Seniors Committee will rectify this sorry mistake soon enough.

 

By the way, I don’t understand all the passionate hate here for broadcasters like Tasker (or Beth Mowins for that matter, whose uniquely husky voice I find quite appropriate for the medium)?? Focus on the game, people!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2020 at 12:38 AM, JetsFan20 said:

What are your thoughts? You can certainly make an argument for him, but I think it’s hard to include him. That era in Bills football already has a ton of HOF representation. 

Yes, the guy was amazing. 
 

It’s a shame Marv Levy didn’t play him at WR in his younger years. Steve was a fearless amazing athlete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...