Kirby Jackson Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 This is a site that has admitted to trolling Bills fans for a reaction. I’m done with them at this point. I’m no longer feeding into their BS. Typically, I’m not overly sensitive when it comes to the Bills. They are just too much for me. I’m unfollowing them and encourage you to do the same. 6 3 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke79 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 I'm with you. I'm going to join Twitter and follow them just so I can unfollow them. 3 20 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said: This is a site that has admitted to trolling Bills fans for a reaction. I’m done with them at this point. I’m no longer feeding into their BS. Typically, I’m not overly sensitive when it comes to the Bills. They are just too much for me. I’m unfollowing them and encourage you to do the same. What took you so long? I never followed them, but their credibility tanked with me when Sam Monson admitted they asserted that Duck Hodges was better than Josh Allen just to get a reaction. 7 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 9 Isles Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Yeah I unfollowed them and honestly only ever notice their garbage analytics posts when other Bills fans bring them up. They are a bunch of nerds with statistics and internet connections and that about it. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted May 12, 2020 Author Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, RaoulDuke79 said: I'm with you. I'm going to join Twitter and follow them just so I can unfollow them. #unfollowpff 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stank_Nasty Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) I had started to just laugh them off with all the Allen crap over the last 2 years. Especially last year..... but they officially went to complete joke/worthless status for me when they ranked 18 corners in front of Tre by the end of the season. Absolutely ABSURD. By that point they were already basically off my radar but that’s the one that made it 100% tre white..... the 19th best corner in football..... let that soak in. Edited May 12, 2020 by Stank_Nasty 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QB Bills Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 They both picked Allen. What's the big deal here? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) It isn't just Bills fans. Clickbait trolling is their shtick. This is still hands down one of the most moronic takes I've ever seen: They conclude that Golden Tate is more valuable than Myles Garrett, solely because he plays on offense and offense matters more than defense. And because pass rush isn't as important as pass coverage. That's it, that's their whole reasoning. Edited May 12, 2020 by HappyDays 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stank_Nasty Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) Just now, HappyDays said: It isn't just Bills fans. Clickbait trolling is their shtick. This is still hands down one of the most moronic takes I've ever seen: They conclude that Golden Tate is more valuable than Myles Garrett solely because he plays on offense and offense matters more than defense. And pass rush isn't as important as pass coverage. That's it, that's their whole reasoning. Holy hell. They’re just shameless Edited May 12, 2020 by Stank_Nasty 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 7 minutes ago, QB Bills said: They both picked Allen. What's the big deal here? Not sure. Maybe the fact that they even bothered to question it has some Bills fans in a tizzy. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted May 12, 2020 Author Share Posted May 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, QB Bills said: They both picked Allen. What's the big deal here? If you think that they legitimately believe this is a question you haven’t been following PFF. @Hapless Bills Fan referenced it earlier but they’ve admitted to trolling Bills fans to get clicks and discussion. We are the most active on socially media and the first to respond. There are numbers that support it. There are reasons that they don’t troll the Chargers. No one will click on, retweet or respond. They fire at us (and the Browns apparently) because we have active and passionate fan bases. I’m done taking the bait. They make their money by followers, subscriptions and clicks. I’m just not going to support their agenda anymore. If they lose Bills fans they lose a hell of a lot more than if they lose Chargers fans. That’s why they shoot at us. They want a reaction from us good or bad. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 6 minutes ago, QB Bills said: They both picked Allen. What's the big deal here? it's like asking who's nicer, Mother Teresa or Jeffrey Dahmer. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 19 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: This is a site that has admitted to trolling Bills fans for a reaction. I’m done with them at this point. I’m no longer feeding into their BS. Typically, I’m not overly sensitive when it comes to the Bills. They are just too much for me. I’m unfollowing them and encourage you to do the same. They admitted to fabricating the whole Duck Hodges thing for a reaction. They are just bored and looking for reactable content Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert James Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 12 minutes ago, QB Bills said: They both picked Allen. What's the big deal here? I think the problem is that Josh Allen is generally ranked much higher in quarterback ratings. Comparing Josh to the bottom of the heap is insulting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills808 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Next on PFF- who would you rather have at QB: Aaron Rodgers or Jameis Winston? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, Robert James said: I think the problem is that Josh Allen is generally ranked much higher in quarterback ratings. Comparing Josh to the bottom of the heap is insulting. I am a fan of analytics. It’s not just for “nerds”. The recent need for moving into the ESPN area of hot takes is low brow from PFF. I will agree with that. It discredit some of the good work they have done. But in regards to your comment...Meh. Allen is looking like he has the ability to improve but hasn’t put guys like Trubiski and Bortles decline far enough in the rear view to rule it out. Some may “billieve” but fact of the matter is he hasn’t proven to be better yet. Just a lot of what ifs. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroutDog Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 11 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: If you think that they legitimately believe this is a question you haven’t been following PFF. @Hapless Bills Fan referenced it earlier but they’ve admitted to trolling Bills fans to get clicks and discussion. We are the most active on socially media and the first to respond. There are numbers that support it. There are reasons that they don’t troll the Chargers. No one will click on, retweet or respond. They fire at us (and the Browns apparently) because we have active and passionate fan bases. I’m done taking the bait. They make their money by followers, subscriptions and clicks. I’m just not going to support their agenda anymore. If they lose Bills fans they lose a hell of a lot more than if they lose Chargers fans. That’s why they shoot at us. They want a reaction from us good or bad. Agreed. This kicker is, when you hear them in interviews outside of their own filter, they’re reasonable. That’s what makes it all the more crappy: they could provide valuable information without a slant but they’re not willing to do that because, of course, it’s a business first (which I completely understand). What I don’t get is if they got an actual business person in their ‘building’, there are other ways to monetize the data...and, more than likely, be more profitable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalover4life Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Next on PFF- who would you rather have at QB: Aaron Rodgers or Jameis Winston? well apparently the packers them selves think Rodgers is replaceable 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroutDog Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Mango said: I am a fan of analytics. It’s not just for “nerds”. The recent need for moving into the ESPN area of hot takes is low brow from PFF. I will agree with that. It discredit some of the good work they have done. But in regards to your comment...Meh. Allen is looking like he has the ability to improve but hasn’t put guys like Trubiski and Bortles decline far enough in the rear view to rule it out. Some may “billieve” but fact of the matter is he hasn’t proven to be better yet. Just a lot of what ifs. It seems as though you and I are watching different games. Perhaps segregating them would help you see the improvement (R year pre and post injury, compared with year two is a good place to start). That serves as three data points. 1 minute ago, buffalover4life said: well apparently the packers them selves think Rodgers is replaceable I don’t think they’re saying he’s replaceable, I thing their draft said they grasp the fact that he’s aging and is expensive. Their are limits from the business side in the NFL and those effect how teams move forward from a personnel perspective. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMF2006 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 29 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: #unfollowpff #trending 26 minutes ago, HappyDays said: It isn't just Bills fans. Clickbait trolling is their shtick. This is still hands down one of the most moronic takes I've ever seen: They conclude that Golden Tate is more valuable than Myles Garrett, solely because he plays on offense and offense matters more than defense. And because pass rush isn't as important as pass coverage. That's it, that's their whole reasoning. I would say Golden Taint is more valuable because he is allowed to play Garrett will be more valuable once he apologises to Rodger and gets back on the field. How's that for logic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts