Jump to content

Josh Allen "Prove it" Season In Year 3


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

There appears to be a few my friend. If it weren't for drops, he'd have been Marino, etc. 

 

What's interesting here is that the OP is one of the optimistic, reasonable posters on the board. He's getting ripped for asking a legit questions.

 

Josh was basically built in a lab to play the position, but he's got to get better at the read/recognize/RELEASE aspect of his game. Improved a good deal in short accuracy. Now he's gotta continue to improve on the aforementioned as well as deep ball accuracy.

 

The offense looks pretty solid. We saw stark improvement from year one to year two. The OP appears to want to see the same level of improvement in year 3. I suppose that's too much to ask for some.

Well, if so, they are just as dogmatic and unrealistic as the folks who already know Josh is a bad qb. I agree that one hopes for another leap in year 3. I am operating under the surmise that is likely. Assuming we get past the current health isolation, we'll see soon enough.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whorlnut said:

If you are indeed a fan of the Bills, then why are you arguing so hard against Allen?  Is it because you have a burning desire to be right that you can’t let it go?  We should all want him to succeed, but you are seeming to make it your mission to trash him and tell us all why he won’t. It’s pretty sad. 

 

It was a question that I answered. I wasn't arguing against him. Pointing out facts is not against a person to succeed. I want him to succeed. The truth is I've never said otherwise. Your bias won't allow you to see I have no animus against the guy. I just don't think he's a good QB as of right now. I hope he is, I've always said so. I'm happy about the Diggs trade and I hope he had Hooper to bail him out if he's getting flushed out of the pocket as a big target.

 

Let's pretend he succeeds incredibly and is our QB for 15 years and his decline is evident. Will pointing that out reduce my fandom as well or only when he's young?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, thebandit27 said:


Bottom 5 in most passing categories?

 

I’m curious if you ever say anything about Allen that’s true?

 

He was 23rd in yards, 23rd in TDs, 18th in TD %age, 16th in INT %age, 23rd in ANY/A, 24th in passer rating...at what point do you just stop making things up?

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/passing.htm

 

Or is the stat guy drunk about the above too?

There’s not a single QB on that list below Allen in yards who played 16 games.  Only 1 played more than 13 games (Jacoby Brissett).  For TD passes, only 2 Brissett and Trubisky played more than 13 games and threw fewer than Allen.  Only 3 with lower passer ratings played more than 13 games.  jrober is right.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billl said:

There’s not a single QB on that list below Allen in yards who played 16 games.  Only 1 played more than 13 games (Jacoby Brissett).  For TD passes, only 2 Brissett and Trubisky played more than 13 games and threw fewer than Allen.  Only 3 with lower passer ratings played more than 13 games.  jrober is right.


Nope. He’s wrong, and you’re a ways late to the discussion. Just look at TD%, since it is as apples-to-apples as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, whorlnut said:

If you are indeed a fan of the Bills, then why are you arguing so hard against Allen?  Is it because you have a burning desire to be right that you can’t let it go?  We should all want him to succeed, but you are seeming to make it your mission to trash him and tell us all why he won’t. It’s pretty sad. 

 

I am sorry I hate this argument. I really hate it. Being a fan of the Bills or of any other pro sports team does not require blind loyalty towards every guy who puts on the jersey. That might be your style of fandom but it sure as hell isn't mine. I am not wired that way. If someone feels strongly in a negative way about a player, any player, it does not make them sad, or desperate to be right, or any less of a fan.

 

I remain on the fence on Allen but sit on the optimistic side of that fence and think, as the OP says, we will know a lot more after this season. But I have been critical of him at times and he has given us things to be legitimately critical of. I am critical of other players on the roster at times too. Doesn't stop me rooting for them when they take the field on a Sunday. It just means that from Monday to Saturday when I sit and go back through the games I try my damndest to watch Bills games back in the same dispassionate way I watch the other 31 teams. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


Nope. He’s wrong, and you’re a ways late to the discussion. Just look at TD%, since it is as apples-to-apples as it gets.

These guys think efficiency metrics relate to number of games played.

 

i wouldn’t bother.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pop gun said:

If that is you argument, strictly TD passes thrown, Allen is tied for 21st, not bottom 5, IDK what to tell you as stats don't lie!

 

Rk Player Tm Age Pos G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD
TD% Int Int% 1D Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD
1 Lamar Jackson*+ BAL 22 QB 15 15 13-2-0 265 401 66.1 3127 36 9.0 6 1.5 161 83 7.8 8.9 11.8 208.5 113.3   23 106 7.13 8.19 5.4 1 2
2 Jameis Winston TAM 25 QB 16 16 7-9-0 380 626 60.7 5109 33 5.3 30 4.8 243 71 8.2 7.1 13.4 319.3 84.3   47 282 7.17 6.15 7.0 2 2
3 Russell Wilson* SEA 31 QB 16 16 11-5-0 341 516 66.1 4110 31 6.0 5 1.0 190 60 8.0 8.7 12.1 256.9 106.3   48 319 6.72 7.42 8.5 4 5
4 Dak Prescott DAL 26 QB 16 16 8-8-0 388 596 65.1 4902 30 5.0 11 1.8 229 62 8.2 8.4 12.6 306.4 99.7   23 151 7.68 7.84 3.7    
5 Carson Wentz PHI 27 QB 16 16 9-7-0 388 607 63.9 4039 27 4.4 7 1.2 213 53 6.7 7.0 10.4 252.4 93.1   37 230 5.91 6.26 5.7 2 4
6 Jimmy Garoppolo SFO 28 QB 16 16 13-3-0 329 476 69.1 3978 27 5.7 13 2.7 193 75 8.4 8.3 12.1 248.6 102.0   36 237 7.31 7.22 7.0 4 4
7 Drew Brees* NOR 40 QB 11 11 8-3-0 281 378 74.3 2979 27 7.1 4 1.1 159 61 7.9 8.8 10.6 270.8 116.3   12 89 7.41 8.33 3.1 1 2
8 Matt Ryan ATL 34 QB 15 15 7-8-0 408 616 66.2 4466 26 4.2 14 2.3 228 93 7.3 7.1 10.9 297.7 92.1   48 316 6.25 6.08 7.2 3 2
9 Aaron Rodgers* GNB 36 QB 16 16 13-3-0 353 569 62.0 4002 26 4.6 4 0.7 189 74 7.0 7.6 11.3 250.1 95.4   36 284 6.15 6.71 6.0 2 3
10 Deshaun Watson* HOU 24 QB 15 15 10-5-0 333 495 67.3 3852 26 5.3 12 2.4 191 54 7.8 7.7 11.6 256.8 98.0   44 257 6.67 6.63 8.2 3 5
11 Patrick Mahomes* KAN 24 QB 14 14 11-3-0 319 484 65.9 4031 26 5.4 5 1.0 176 83 8.3 8.9 12.6 287.9 105.3   17 127 7.79 8.38 3.4 1 1
12 Kirk Cousins* MIN 31 QB 15 15 10-5-0 307 444 69.1 3603 26 5.9 6 1.4 165 66 8.1 8.7 11.7 240.2 107.4   28 206 7.20 7.73 5.9 1 1
13 Tom Brady NWE 42 QB 16 16 12-4-0 373 613 60.8 4057 24 3.9 8 1.3 193 59 6.6 6.8 10.9 253.6 88.0   27 185 6.05 6.24 4.2 1 1
14 Daniel Jones NYG 22 QB 13 12 3-9-0 284 459 61.9 3027 24 5.2 12 2.6 140 75 6.6 6.5 10.7 232.8 87.7   38 295 5.50 5.38 7.6 1 2
15 Philip Rivers LAC 38 QB 16 16 5-11-0 390 591 66.0 4615 23 3.9 20 3.4 217 84 7.8 7.1 11.8 288.4 88.5   34 222 7.03 6.32 5.4 1 2
16 Jared Goff LAR 25 QB 16 16 9-7-0 394 626 62.9 4638 22 3.5 16 2.6 220 66 7.4 7.0 11.8 289.9 86.5   22 170 6.90 6.46 3.4 1 2
17 Baker Mayfield CLE 24 QB 16 16 6-10-0 317 534 59.4 3827 22 4.1 21 3.9 179 89 7.2 6.2 12.1 239.2 78.8   40 285 6.17 5.29 7.0 1 1
18 Ryan Tannehill* TEN 31 QB 12 10 7-3-0 201 286 70.3 2742 22 7.7 6 2.1 126 91 9.6 10.2 13.6 228.5 117.5   31 212 7.98 8.52 9.8 2 3
19 Derek Carr OAK 28 QB 16 16 7-9-0 361 513 70.4 4054 21 4.1 8 1.6 191 75 7.9 8.0 11.2 253.4 100.8   29 184 7.14 7.25 5.4 2 3
20 Gardner Minshew JAX 23 QB 14 12 6-6-0 285 470 60.6 3271 21 4.5 6 1.3 150 70 7.0 7.3 11.5 233.6 91.2   33 184 6.14 6.44 6.6 3 3
21 Kyler Murray ARI 22 QB 16 16 5-10-1 349 542 64.4 3722 20 3.7 12 2.2 173 88 6.9 6.6 10.7 232.6 87.4   48 309 5.78 5.55 8.1 1 2
22 Ryan Fitzpatrick MIA 37 QB 15 13 5-8-0 311 502 62.0 3529 20 4.0 13 2.6 182 51 7.0 6.7 11.3 235.3 85.5   40 209 6.13 5.78 7.4 3 4
23 Josh Allen BUF 23 QB 16 16 10-6-0 271 461 58.8 3089 20 4.3 9 2.0 146 53 6.7 6.7 11.4 193.1 85.3   38 237 5.72 5.71 7.6 4 5
24 Sam Darnold NYJ 22 QB 13 13 7-6-0 273 441 61.9 3024 19 4.3 13 2.9 147 92 6.9 6.4 11.1 232.6 84.3   33 212 5.93 5.50 7.0 2 3
25 Matthew Stafford DET 31 QB 8 8 3-4-1 187 291 64.3 2499 19 6.5 5 1.7 117 66 8.6 9.1 13.4 312.4 106.0   18 137 7.64 8.15 5.8 2 1
26 Jacoby Brissett IND 27 QB 15 15 7-8-0 272 447 60.9 2942 18 4.0 6 1.3 143 50 6.6 6.8 10.8 196.1 88.0   27 159 5.87 6.06 5.7 2 2
27 Mitchell Trubisky CHI 25 QB 15 15 8-7-0 326 516 63.2 3138 17 3.3 10 1.9 156 53 6.1 5.9 9.6 209.2 83.0   38 234 5.24 5.04 6.9 3 3
28 Kyle Allen CAR 23 QB 13 12 5-7-0 303 489 62.0 3322 17 3.5 16 3.3 188 52 6.8 6.0 11.0 255.5 80.0   46 397 5.47 4.76 8.6 0 1
29 Andy Dalton CIN 32 QB 13 13 2-11-0 314 528 59.5 3494 16 3.0 14 2.7 170 66 6.6 6.0 11.1 268.8 78.3   37 249 5.74 5.19 6.5    
30 Mason Rudolph PIT 24 QB 10 8 5-3-0 176 283 62.2 1765 13 4.6 9 3.2 80 76 6.2 5.7 10.0 176.5 82.0   15 124 5.51 5.02 5.0 1 1
31 Case Keenum WAS 31 QB 10 8 1-7-0 160 247 64.8 1707 11 4.5 5 2.0 83 69 6.9 6.9 10.7 170.7 91.3   15 145 5.96 5.94 5.7    
32 Teddy Bridgewater NOR 27 qb 9 5 5-0-0 133 196 67.9 1384 9 4.6 2 1.0 67 45 7.1 7.5 10.4 153.8 99.1   12 89 6.23 6.66 5.8 1 2

Now look at how man games the QBs below him played.  Darnold and Stafford each threw exactly one fewer TD than Allen, but they played 13 games and 8 games respectively.  I mean he threw 10 more TDs than Bridgewater, but Teddy only started 5 games.  If you limit the list to those who started at least 13 games, he’s bottom 5 in most major passing categories.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, whorlnut said:

I think you are missing the fact that he moved the team down into FG range to tie the game and send it to overtime. And the fact that if Knox or Morse hits a block on the QB keeper in OT that we probably would have won the gMe on a FG. 
 

Yes...he had a poor second half. But let’s be honest...the defense let up when Watson started going off and the play calls from Daboll were very conservative. They were definitely playing not to lose, which is not what you want to do in the playoffs on the road. 

 

I understand that. And Teddy brought it up too.

 

My point is we had opportunities after the missed blocks.  And if we'd got a TD instead of a FG on that drive in regulation, we win.  Opportunities were there.  A 30 million dollar man needs to make it happen then.  Our opponents QB was in a similar spot but was able to come up with the big play when needed.  That's what  we should be looking for, not being satisfied that Josh got close and if someone else had done something we would have won.  No more excuses.  Just win somehow.    QBs job is to win.  That's why he makes the most money.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, jrober38 said:

 

We have a year to figure it out which is good. I think he needs to improve a lot.  

 

At his current level, I don't think he warrants the $30 mil/year he'll likely ask for.

 

Recent history has shown that paying non elite QBs has major effects on that team's ability to win football games after the new contract kicks in. 

 Josh is a young guy who knows he has to improve. He works hard and is a great leader. Now he has a better offense surrounding him, and 2 years of starts. If he wins the division and a playoff game, why wouldn't he deserve consideration to get paid with top 5 QBs. The guy was thrust into the starting position as a rookie and had less than average o-line and skill players. Last year was better but still subpar receivers. The guy is durable, super athletic, and has great arm talent. As a fan, I believe Josh takes a huge step forward this season. Dabol also must trust Josh to be aggressive in the 2nd half of games with leads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billl said:

Now look at how man games the QBs below him played.  Darnold and Stafford each threw exactly one fewer TD than Allen, but they played 13 games and 8 games respectively.  I mean he threw 10 more TDs than Bridgewater, but Teddy only started 5 games.  If you limit the list to those who started at least 13 games, he’s bottom 5 in most major passing categories.


Now, what if you look at TD passes per pass thrown?

 

Or are you aiming to be the 3rd poster to ignore this question?

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billl said:

Now look at how man games the QBs below him played.  Darnold and Stafford each threw exactly one fewer TD than Allen, but they played 13 games and 8 games respectively.  I mean he threw 10 more TDs than Bridgewater, but Teddy only started 5 games.  If you limit the list to those who started at least 13 games, he’s bottom 5 in most major passing categories.

Now read exactly what he said Billlllllllllllllllllllll............

 

 "Mine was as a starter for a season he is in the bottom 5 of TDs thrown and that has merit as well meaning you have to deliver with your arm as a QB no matter how many attempts you have."

 

Reading comprehension Billllllllllllllllllllllllllllll............ 

 

He said it doesn't matter how many attempts, Allen is bottom 5 in TD passes, when in fact Allen was tied for 21st. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I am sorry I hate this argument. I really hate it. Being a fan of the Bills or of any other pro sports team does not require blind loyalty towards every guy who puts on the jersey. That might be your style of fandom but it sure as hell isn't mine. I am not wired that way. If someone feels strongly in a negative way about a player, any player, it does not make them sad, or desperate to be right, or any less of a fan.

 

I remain on the fence on Allen but sit on the optimistic side of that fence and think, as the OP says, we will know a lot more after this season. But I have been critical of him at times and he has given us things to be legitimately critical of. I am critical of other players on the roster at times too. Doesn't stop me rooting for them when they take the field on a Sunday. It just means that from Monday to Saturday when I sit and go back through the games I try my damndest to watch Bills games back in the same dispassionate way I watch the other 31 teams. 

Of course not, but if they use bad statistics to incorrectly define said player it DOES make them wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Of course not, but if they use bad statistics to incorrectly define said player it DOES make them wrong.

 

Oh I agree with that. That wasn't the point I was responding to. I was responding to the idea that posters who are negative about Josh are doing it because they are sad or want to be right. 

 

I haven't once defended some of the creative use of statistics in this thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lieutenant Aldo Raine said:

Crazy how everyone doesn’t even touch on his other intangibles that separates him from just a few others.  Such as his escapability, toughness, ability to extend plays and pick up first downs.  And what about 3rd or 4th and a yard.   It’s about as guaranteed as you can get.  He’s exciting and brings an element of surprise to the position (both good and bad at times), but it’s fun.  Buffalo is getting a lot more national exposure nowadays because how exciting this team is, it’s awesome.  And Josh Allen is a big part of that whether you like it (or him) or not!  

Shhhhhhhhhhh None of those things count! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


Now, what if you look at TD passes per pass thrown?

 

Or are you aiming to be the 3rd poster to ignore this question?

 

No one is ignoring it, it's a different argument. It's ignoring the truth of one statement to make a new criteria for the same argument. He's in the bottom 5 of starters of thrown TDs per game. Fact.

 

Is that because of lack of attempts or lack of completions to get more attempts to throw more touchdowns or because he rushes for those TDs? Again, all legit arguments, but they are different arguments.

 

What you are saying is true. No one disputes it. Why is our statement ignored to acknowledge a new argument? It's apples to apples vs apples to bananas.

 

Still the other things he ranks in the bottom 5 have been ignored: completion rate, fumbles, yard per game passing, etc.. It appears the reason why people are sticking on this argument and ignoring the rest is because it's the easiest to argue around. Why not acknowledge our statement of fact as true but then show why it's not a complete picture? I'm ok with that.

 

The truth remains we were in the bottom 1/3rd of teams on offense. 3 points away from Washington as the worst and 11.5 from Baltimore. Is that the OC, HC, QB? It's a combo IMO.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2020 at 12:31 PM, Cripple Creek said:

It most definitely is.  If it were your money would you be ready to pony up 35-40m/season based on what you've seen to this point?

At this point you don't have to pony up 35 million.  Let's get to that point and see what we've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...