Jump to content

Why Was Frank Gore So Ineffective Down The Stretch?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Ultimately, I think his age slowed him down, but I also think play selection got very predictable when he was on the field.  It seemed like they felt obligated to get him a number of snaps per game in deference to his career stature and leadership. When he was on the field they almost always gave him the ball.  Since he had slowed down, those handoffs were pretty much always between the tackles.

 

Very true on both fronts.  Old runners fall of a cliff quickly.

 

In my opinion, the best way to build a backfield is to draft someone in Rounds 2-3 (this is the sweet spot for getting solid value) at least every 2-4 years.  You always want to have two young guys splitting time, rather than count on a single workhorse.  And when Free Agency eventually comes up, don't get emotionally attached to the fan favorites.  Realize they can be replaced.

 

The Bills should be seeking an RB in the draft this year to pair with Devin Singletary.  Rookies at the position can often come in Year 1 and be very effective, especially in a timeshare.  Jonathan Taylor and JK Dobbins are some options usually mocked in the 2nd Round this year.  Clyde Edwards-Helaire, Zack Moss, Cam Akers, Eno Benjamin and AJ Dillon are some guys who would likely be available in the 3rd.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once Devin went down it felt like Daboll felt obligated to leave Frank in there to pass Barry Sanders. It was a calculated error to bring in a RB that old for some nostalgic mentoring. Yeldon would have produced much more in backup duty and been less predictable. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:

This, for part time fans like Phil who have to ask.. Washington game is where his wonderful career hit the concrete wall because that’s when Motor became the focal point of the running game. After that, when Gore came in, it meant he was getting the ball on short yardage plays. 


I don’t know if I buy this, because the Washington game was earlier in the year.  If it was so apparent like you said, why would the Bills continually use Gore over and over and over again?

40 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

Fail.  His touches went down after game 6.  Instead of an average of 14+ touches per game, he was betting just over 9 touches down the stretch.  Chandler's explanation is the simplest.  As Singletary became the feature back, Gore had to transition to a short yardage specialist.  Unfortunately, he often failed in that role.  On a number of occasions, he failed to convert on third and short or fourth and short.


If he often failed, why didn’t they find a new short yardage back?  Why would they stick with Gore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:

Bro, I was gonna respond with 163 LMAOFLLFFLLOLOLLL

I literally thought of you when I typed it, so.....

 

RRROOOOTTTTCCCC(carpeted)FFFFFFLLLLLLMMMMMAAAAAOOOOOOLOLCATZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some age- play calls were short yardage with an o line that had a terrible time moving guys in short yardage situations generally weren't physical enough. 

started sneaking Josh who to his credit picked them up but was never easy as we know. Who is that Mauler you can get behind on 3rd and 1.5 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Phil The Thrill said:

In looking back on the 2019 season I’m continually perplexed how bad Frank Gore was running the ball.  He was completely ineffective and it seemed like every time he carried the ball he ran straight into a brick wall.  It was terrible - and yes way worse than Mike Tolbert running the ball in 2017.

 

I have never been more frustrated with a player than I have with Frank Gore running the ball toward the end of the 2019 season.  I’ll stand by the fact that I think keeping him active hurt the team and that I get the team would have been better off with Yeldon on the field.   He should have not been active....period.

 

But his season didn’t start bad by any means.   He was the main RB after Singletary’s injury in Week 2 and he performed well.  I split his season up roughly based on the number of carries.  
 

These are his numbers in Weeks 1-6:

 

86 carries for 388 yards

4.5 yards per carry

14.3 carries per game

2 rushing TD’s

 

Weeks 7-16

91 carries for 211 yards

2.3 yards per carry

9.1 carries per game

0 rushing TD’s

 

What inflates these numbers badly is a 27 yard run versus Denver.  If you take that out of the mix, Gore was 90 carries for 184 and a whopping 2 yards per carry.  
 

 So the question is, why did his production drop off?    Did they run Gore too hard when Singletary was hurt as opposed to spreading his carries out over the year?  Did he get burned out carrying the load early in?  Or was Gore so limited that it became predictable when he was in the backfield?   Teams knew his limitations and just run blitzed the house to stop him?

 

I do respect what Gore has done and am glad he was a good mentor to Singletary but unless you can turn back the clock 10 years, I never....NEVER want to see him carry the ball for the Bills again.  It was just too tragic.  

 

 

 

He is old- thats why

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Ultimately, I think his age slowed him down, but I also think play selection got very predictable when he was on the field.  It seemed like they felt obligated to get him a number of snaps per game in deference to his career stature and leadership. When he was on the field they almost always gave him the ball.  Since he had slowed down, those handoffs were pretty much always between the tackles.

I felt he had a an ankle or foot issue. What burst he had disappeared. He was getting into the push by the line at the right moment.
Play calling was weak for him as well. Never looked him out to the flat or over the middle did they?
Or gave him room with the play call.

 at one point it felt like Bills were just running a play to set something up, or catch a defense napping.

something was amiss. cuz he was making plays first half of season it seemed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the 2nd half of the season when Frank was on the field, it was mainly to run out the clock and reduce the game time.  Opposing defenses knew we were running the ball in that situation and loaded the box.  Gore does not have the same burst that he had 10  years ago to counter that and was wrapped easily at the LoS.   Our OL also did not do him much favor in helping run between the tackles.   This is a missing piece of our OL.   We were good in running the ball when there was space created for the RB (Creative play calling).  But running straight and ramming down the throats of the defense, we struggled mightily. 

 

We need a more dominating OL (attitude) and a hard nosed RB who can run between the tackles and TIRE the defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, freddyjj said:

Gore was seldom used in the 11 formation they used in back half of season.   When he went on field we lined up in heavy formations more often.  As a result lots of 8 or 9 man boxes.  He was in when they knew we were running (short yardage, goal line or 4 minute drill).  Not a lot of lanes to run through and he was too slow to run outside by design.

 

That's why there will be a new compliment to Motor in 2020.

 

Nice Motor, good Motor....

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they'd had the foresight to get a better back last off-season, they might have won a playoff game. They probably would have won at least one more game during the season. Gore was a liability.

1 hour ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

Tired legs,  would have been better coming in the second half of the season but he was invaluable in teaching Singletary how to be a pro.

 

 

 

 

Prove it. How did you reach that conclusion? 
"Invaluable" Really, how the ***** do you know?

 

 

 

Edited by 32ABBA
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...