NewEra Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 On 5/30/2020 at 4:09 AM, eball said: At all. Before the Bills went out and brought in who they did, and drafted AJ, you could have envisioned a scenario in which they signed Clowney...but not now. While I do agree that he’s not in our plans, I wouldn’t rule it out just because we’ve added other players. Trent can be cut and save us 8 mill. We have the room to add 15 mill if we cut Trent. So, while he have a very good DL right now, cutting Murphy and replacing him with Clowney would give us an elite DL imo. He’s exactly what we need imo. One year deal isn’t breaking the bank. It’s going for it. This is a perfect year to go all in imo. That being said, doesn’t seem like he’s a process guy and fits the McD mold. That doesn’t mean he wouldn’t make our defense better....which makes our team better....which gives us a better chance to win the SB. I can dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket94 Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 On 3/18/2020 at 10:04 AM, Reed83HOF said: Yup. This is where you swoop in and get value I thought the Bills explored Clowney last year...good fit though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 I’m sick of Clowney. Seattle, Cleveland and rumors TN all made offers and he is way overvaluing his worth. He’d be smart to just go back to Seattle and accept he is not getting an $18 mil. offer. Even if it is a short deal so he can increase his stock for next year. The crazy thing is if he’s not going to be a stud opposite Watt, he’s not going to do it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 13 hours ago, Rocket94 said: I thought the Bills explored Clowney last year...good fit though. TBD explored Clowney last summer with a 46 page thread... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket94 Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 2 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: TBD explored Clowney last summer with a 46 page thread... Yes...I was here! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsbackto81 Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 On 5/31/2020 at 12:59 PM, Charles Romes said: McDermott loves to rotate and limited snaps may be exactly what Clowney needs to be his best. Maybe, but you don't pay someone 17 plus million to take limited snaps. This is why this regime favors very good scheme specific DL players over superstars that consume your cap. We got Tre and then Edmunds coming up. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dopey Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 4 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said: Maybe, but you don't pay someone 17 plus million to take limited snaps. This is why this regime favors very good scheme specific DL players over superstars that consume your cap. We got Tre and then Edmunds coming up. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathja Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 19 minutes ago, Dopey said: This. 24 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said: Maybe, but you don't pay someone 17 plus million to take limited snaps. This is why this regime favors very good scheme specific DL players over superstars that consume your cap. We got Tre and then Edmunds coming up. If it’s for only 1 year you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Romes Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 1 hour ago, billsbackto81 said: Maybe, but you don't pay someone 17 plus million to take limited snaps. This is why this regime favors very good scheme specific DL players over superstars that consume your cap. We got Tre and then Edmunds coming up. Unless of course you have a one year window where you can afford it and that one player just might be the thing that brings the Lombardi to Niagara Square. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 Sign Clowney to 1 year deal and cut Murphy. Easy instant upgrade. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 He’s averaged 5.33 sacks per year since he started in 2014. He hasn’t played all 16 games most seasons, and he’s just not worth even $13 mil. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Romes Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 You might just have to overpay for him if you think he’s the missing piece. The Chiefs thought Sammy Watkins was the missing piece, and it turns out, they were right. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 16 hours ago, billsbackto81 said: Maybe, but you don't pay someone 17 plus million to take limited snaps. This is why this regime favors very good scheme specific DL players over superstars that consume your cap. We got Tre and then Edmunds coming up. but you draft one in the top ten? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slippery Rubber Mats Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 Clowney on a 1 year deal in Buffalo makes so much sense. As someone else pointed out, with the Bills rotation on the line I think he could have a great year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 The ball is basically in his court. He's had offers from teams seen as contenders and otherwise, but is still not on a roster. It's strictly about $$$ at this point and maybe he doesn't want to participate in any team's TC. Who knows? He will be on a roster somewhere by the middle-end of August with the team that offers him the most money, regardless of whether they are viewed as a contending team or not. It won't be us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSarcasm Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chemical said: but you draft one in the top ten? Yeah because you still aren't paying him 17 mil per season AND you have 4+ years locked up. Big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, MrSarcasm said: Yeah because you still aren't paying him 17 mil per season AND you have 4+ years locked up. Big difference. First of all it’s only one year hypothetically and not restricting any extensions or other free agent signings The top ten pick is still a valuable asset to use on a player only getting around half the snaps on defense. despite the dui charge I think he will get more than that as his career goes on, but the system will always be set up for him to split snaps. edit: and then you have to pay him big bucks to split snaps if it works out. Edited June 2, 2020 by Chemical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 16 hours ago, Charles Romes said: Unless of course you have a one year window where you can afford it and that one player just might be the thing that brings the Lombardi to Niagara Square. If this was true, then of course. But he has not done so for his previous teams. How many additional wins does he deliver? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 26 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said: If this was true, then of course. But he has not done so for his previous teams. How many additional wins does he deliver? It’s not even possible to calculate that. It’s speculation. I would speculate that with this secondary some of those many pressures he gets while adding to the run defense would turn into sacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 32 minutes ago, Chemical said: It’s not even possible to calculate that. It’s speculation. I would speculate that with this secondary some of those many pressures he gets while adding to the run defense would turn into sacks. Last season Seattle was 12-6 in a season Clowney dealt with injuries. In games he played 75% of the snaps they were 6-1 including 3 wins vs playoff teams. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts