H2o Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 I take it this means they are out on Blake Martinez? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 I really expected him in Buffalo but I didn’t expect a 2 year $16M deal. Kirksey is a good player when healthy. With the Bills he would be a part-time player though. That feels like too much for the role he would have played. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 14 minutes ago, wppete said: Pass way too expensive for an often Injured player. Agree on the pass. Injury issues for 2/6 years - not sure if often injured or unlucky. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: Ok I am ok with this. I would not have wanted to go that High Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 (edited) I might be in the minority here, but I think his deal is relatively fair. I don’t see him as fair to be labeled injury prone when his last injury isn’t the kind of reoccurring and just bad luck most likely. He was healthy first 4 years. Stafford was labeled fragile because he had a couple bad luck injuries to start his career. Then went a long time before getting hurt again. Sometimes in a violent game you get a couple injuries close to each other. I’m not so quick to label a guy injury prove over that, especially if it’s not consistent ticky tack stuff. But I also won’t lose sleep over this, but just do think his contract was reasonable based on his level of play before the last 2 years got shortened. Edited March 16, 2020 by Alphadawg7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 13 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: I might be in the minority here, but I think his deal is relatively fair. I don’t see him as fair to be labeled injury prone when his last injury isn’t the kind of reoccurring and just bad luck most likely. He was healthy first 4 years. Stafford was labeled fragile because he had a couple bad luck injuries to start his career. Then went a long time before getting hurt again. Sometimes in a violent game you get a couple injuries close to each other. I’m not so quick to label a guy injury prove over that, especially if it’s not consistent ticky tack stuff. But I also won’t lose sleep over this, but just do think his contract was reasonable based on his level of play before the last 2 years got shortened. For a full-time LB'er like he'll be with the Pack but not here, it's a fair deal. Health-willing, of course. But time will tell on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted March 16, 2020 Share Posted March 16, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts