Jump to content

The Roger Stone Case


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

I'm a POS -- for posting an article that has a different opinion than yours because it relies on actual facts, not suppositions and emotional outrage. 

 

Keep on thinking you're stable, Tibs. It's going well for you.

 

 

Wow.  He thinks you're a Person Of Substance.  That's nice.  Though he probably should write it out long hand from now on, as by using the acronym people might think he views you the way most everybody else views him.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Taro T said:

 

Wow.  He thinks you're a Person Of Substance.  That's nice.  Though he probably should write it out long hand from now on, as by using the acronym people might think he views you the way most everybody else views him.  ;)


Fib only knows how to name call.

 

That is why most on here don’t take him seriously whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ALF said:

40 months prison time


Considering what she said she was going to take into account (the Credico "threat" that Credico said he did not feel was threatening, an attorney letter saying Stone was worse than a terrorist, a few out there TDS letters, etc), I am shocked it is this "low".

Let the appeals begin!


 

 


 

 


 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Fox News and Twitter is already spreading the propaganda that the trial was unfair. Hey, it’s not like the Senate Republicans can Judge all of Trump’s crimes. 

 

How long till this criminal is pardoned and back working to steal 2020 election? 

On 2/14/2020 at 6:15 PM, SoCal Deek said:

So when the previous President of the United States jumps into a case at a local level, and calls the Massachusetts Police Department 'stupid' for SPEAKING HARSHLY to a professor friend of his , that's OK?  But when the current President comments on something as serious as sentencing his friend to YEARS IN PRISON.....that's outrageous? If you say so.

Lol!! This is funny. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

<_<
 

 


 

 

 

And THAT'S why the media and the resistance is so up in arms about making sure Stone serves time. They want to hang (fraudulently) the implication of Trump/Russia on him so they can point to his sentence as proof that they didn't bungle the single biggest scandal in US history, but instead got it right. 

 

It's a con game. And the judge is in on it with them (because she's crooked). 

 

It's not going to work, ultimately. Stone's conviction has nothing to do with Russia collusion, the trial in fact proved he did not have the access to Wikileaks the media claimed he had -- but the low information resistance crowd who still don't understand what happened in 2016 will use this to do a victory lap. All that will do is help show who is a serious person and who is not.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and why now? My God, this sure has all the earmarks of a totally corrupt scheme, but since his supporters don't care...

 

 

Quote

 

The White House is moving to take more direct control over pardons and commutations, with President Trump aiming to limit the role of the Justice Department in the clemency process as he weighs a flurry of additional pardon announcements, according to people familiar with the matter.

Trump, who granted clemency Tuesday to a group of 11 people that included several political allies and supporters, has assembled a team of advisers to recommend and vet candidates for pardons, according to several people with knowledge of the matter who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

The group, essentially an informal task force of at least a half-dozen presidential allies, has been meeting since late last year to discuss a revamped pardon system in the White House. Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, is taking a leading role in the new clemency initiative and has supported the idea of putting the White House more directly in control of the process that in past administrations has been housed in the Justice Department, officials said.

 

Pam Bondi, the former Florida attorney general who served on Trump’s impeachment defense team, is also playing a significant role, vetting applications for potential pardon recipients. Kushner has personally reviewed applications with White House lawyers before presenting them to Trump for final approval, according to two senior administration officials.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-assembles-team-of-advisers-to-guide-clemency-process-as-trump-considers-more-pardons/2020/02/19/752d04d2-532e-11ea-929a-64efa7482a77_story.html

Gee, you don't think money will be flowing into this all power Pardon Commission, do you? 

 

This will make Trump U and the Inaugural Committee seem like purse snatching in comparison 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh, and why now? My God, this sure has all the earmarks of a totally corrupt scheme, but since his supporters don't care...

 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-assembles-team-of-advisers-to-guide-clemency-process-as-trump-considers-more-pardons/2020/02/19/752d04d2-532e-11ea-929a-64efa7482a77_story.html

Gee, you don't think money will be flowing into this all power Pardon Commission, do you? 

 

This will make Trump U and the Inaugural Committee seem like purse snatching in comparison 

 

giphy.gif

all 25 pardons and 10 commutations.

 

just stop running around spreading your disease.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tiberius said:

There should be a constitutional amendment to take pardon power away from presidents. What good has it ever done? 

 

Create some independent commission to pardon worthy people 

We have one of those dimwit!  It's called a parole board!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...