Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Yes, I've said negative things about Trump numerous times. I've called him inartful, boorish, a blowhard and a buffoon. Basically, everyone else here who supports his policies and thus his presidency have done the same. 

That is not a criticism of any of his decisions, that's just recognizing his personality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

 

God help us if this is the kind of leadership we ever end up with in a crisis....

She is right though. Economically correct. Trickle down alone won't jump start the economy. If Trump wins reelection he has Nancy Pelosi to thank for pushing money into the consumer sector. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta feel for everyone in world.  People going to be shocked Italy next update.

1 hour ago, dubs said:


honest question: why do you post every singular story of individuals effected by the coronavirus?  It’s not really helpful or informative. Everyone is aware of what this disease can do and everyone thinks it’s sad and tragic to those it impacts. 
 

this isn’t Facebook and I don’t think these posts are particularly informative or helpful. 
 

And I apologize if I’m this is harsh, I don’t mean to be. 

All good I understand.  All about learning from others

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

Normally, I would agree (there are a lot of times I think he would be better served to take the high road) - or, I guess a better way to have put it is that this should have been accomplished behind the scenes. However, as much as I dislike some of the provisions in this legislation or even if Massie may be standing on what he promised his constituency, now is not the time to take that stand - that point has passed. As you well know, there are a lot of people out here that are hurting and concerned right now, and they want to see congress do something that looks and feels helpful right now.

 

The bill sucks, and that's coming from someone who potentially gets the best part of the bill, the forgivable small business loan..

 

The people in charge of passing this bill should look at every line item request and ask/answer one question so simple that even a Tibs/AOC love child could answer it: Does this help Americans get through this economic schittshow? There's a bunch of stupid stuff in this bill and there is literally NO REASON for it to be in there. NONE.

 

The idea of "Well, we have to hold our noses and push this through so it looks and feels helpful right now" is bullschitt.

 

Sorry. Hate the bill. Absolutely hate it.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

She is right though. Economically correct. Trickle down alone won't jump start the economy. If Trump wins reelection he has Nancy Pelosi to thank for pushing money into the consumer sector. 


No. No, she is not. 
 

The words “thankful” and “Nancy Pelosi” should never be used in the same sentence when talking about the economy, unless it is some variation of a sentence like, “I am so thankful Nancy Pelosi has been voted out of office so she can’t damage our economy anymore.”

 

1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

The bill sucks, and that's coming from someone who potentially gets the best part of the bill, the forgivable small business loan..

 

The people in charge of passing this bill should look at every line item request and ask/answer one question so simple that even a Tibs/AOC love child could answer it: Does this help Americans get through this economic schittshow? There's a bunch of stupid stuff in this bill and there is literally NO REASON for it to be in there. NONE.

 

The idea of "Well, we have to hold our noses and push this through so it looks and feels helpful right now" is bullschitt.

 

Sorry. Hate the bill. Absolutely hate it.


Hate it as well. However, that stand should have been taken last week by the Republicans in the Senate.

Edited by billsfan1959
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:


No. No, she is not. 
 

The words “thankful” and “Nancy Pelosi” should never be used in the same sentence when talking about the economy, unless it is some variation of a sentence like, “I am so thankful Nancy Pelosi has been voted out of office so she can’t damage our economy anymore.”

 

On the other hand, anyone who thinks Pelosi is the winner in all of this has a leftwing hand up their puppetass. Pelosi did more damage than anyone by trying to push AOC's agenda into the bill.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW if you're getting texts from friends about the wives tales about avoiding Ibuprofen, this is probably one of those cases where even circumstantial evidence is strong enough to warrant avoiding them altogether.  Always check the label, first.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Cuomo just said that what is killing patients with the virus is that  they are on the ventilators for too long of a period of time. Now we all know that was not literally what he meant. Being on the ventilator too long does not cause death. The media will give him a pass on this as well they should. Think of the uproar if Trump had said this.

She is sounding more like Greta everyday.

Agree with you. Ya in earlier post. I'm much more independent. Like you critical Trump some things. But he done more good than bad. As well Cuomo. Going to criticize him this one. Like you said. My hate now for Nancy pelosi and China government. Blaming everyone else.  And there numbers are full of crap. Imo.

Edited by Buffalo Bills Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:


It was false. And he deleted it after being destroyed on twitter for pushing false information intentionally to scare people. He’s an asshat and a dishonest messenger. Always has been. Full stop. 

So, is this also false?  How is it any different than what he said?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TPS said:

That is not a criticism of any of his decisions, that's just recognizing his personality.

I'm sure there are some things that he actually puts in place that I'm not too happy with but I can't think of any off the top of my head. He's not perfect but he's what we need for the times. He ran on a certain agenda and he's getting it done with the strongest headwinds possible fighting him. He hasn't shriveled up and given in when facing opposition. He's like the opposite of Obama who was all hat and no cattle. Trump is all cattle plus a MAGA hat.  

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GG said:

BTW if you're getting texts from friends about the wives tales about avoiding Ibuprofen, this is probably one of those cases where even circumstantial evidence is strong enough to warrant avoiding them altogether.  Always check the label, first.

Right. Some good sites and YouTube like medcram . But people have to check evidence and ask the doctor over personal opinion if really need them to help live. Like there is something forget helps people life's. Forgot the name. But it's something big to help people. But be careful using anti inflammatory drugs. Ask doctor about them.  Those that use them for non critical things think twice for the same. Use caution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

I disagree. This is bad Trump. He has a great opportunity to take a higher road than he usually does because more people are watching than ever before. Being openly critical like this from someone on his own party, who is just taking a stand he promised to take when elected, is a bad look. Especially when you have nutbags like AOC going fully unhinged as a backdrop to the adults in the room. I really dislike this part of Trump...at least as it relates to his own party. He can do this to crazies like Schumer and Pelosi all day.

 

 

Unfortunately she represents everything the Democrats hate: a, calm, rational, well-spoken woman sharing common sense. 

 

Especially compared to this batschittcrazy loon. It's more fun to watch on mute, by the way.

 

 

She's such a fascist wannabe. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

The bill sucks, and that's coming from someone who potentially gets the best part of the bill, the forgivable small business loan..

 

The people in charge of passing this bill should look at every line item request and ask/answer one question so simple that even a Tibs/AOC love child could answer it: Does this help Americans get through this economic schittshow? There's a bunch of stupid stuff in this bill and there is literally NO REASON for it to be in there. NONE.

 

The idea of "Well, we have to hold our noses and push this through so it looks and feels helpful right now" is bullschitt.

 

Sorry. Hate the bill. Absolutely hate it.


The bill is horrible, and yet it was better than what Nancy was pushing. SMH Wow, do I have low expectations.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:


No. No, she is not. 
 

The words “thankful” and “Nancy Pelosi” should never be used in the same sentence when talking about the economy, unless it is some variation of a sentence like, “I am so thankful Nancy Pelosi has been voted out of office so she can’t damage our economy anymore.”

 

So you simply can't recognize her contributions simply out of blind partisan spite? 

 

Serious question; Do you think Hillary Clinton has people murdered? 

_____

 

 

Over 900 deaths in one day in Italy. Now think about those Spring Breakers that are carrying this thing to every corner of our country! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you simply can't recognize her contributions simply out of blind partisan spite? 

 

Serious question; Do you think Hillary Clinton has people murdered? 

You think Pelosi contributed anything positive to this bill? Name them. Specifically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


The bill is horrible, and yet it was better than what Nancy was pushing. SMH Wow, do I have low expectations.

 

That just underlines my point. The current logic is "It's not perfect, but at least it's not (fill in the blank)."

 

It's not difficult at all to pull the stupid $11B marked for the ADF, IDA, etc. And it's embarrassing anyone would even consider it worth putting in there in the first place.

 

This isn't difficult. But we're just supposed to accept it because it's better than nothing. It sucked when Obama did it and it sucks when Trump and the GOP do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


The bill is horrible, and yet it was better than what Nancy was pushing. SMH Wow, do I have low expectations.

 

Honestly, my biggest concern with this whole thing isn't the virus or even the economic devastation (although both are concerning).  The concern that supersedes all (IMO) is the permanent damage that this will do to the psyche and attitudes of the American people.  The socialists continue to push an agenda and false choice of perceived safety for more control, less transparency, and ultimately more power for them.  At some point, and we may already be there, we will pass the tipping point where enough citizens have been raised on government schools, get their information from government media, and get life's necessities from government homes, government food, government retirement, government transportation, and the list goes on.  Once we pass that tipping point, its game over for American liberties and freedom.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...