Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

 

Correct. The Dems know, for certain, they cannot beat Trump at the ballot box. They also know, for certain, the Senate won't vote to remove. So what's this all about? What's the point of this show? 

 

It's to de-legitimize Trump's second term. 

 

That's it. 

 

And they're doing it, knowing full well how damaging and dangerous that kind of partisan warfare is. But they don't care. Because they're enemies of the republic, of truth, of justice, and our way of life. They crave power. And will do anything, legal or no, to obtain it again. 

 

***** them all.

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cimahilo said:

When is this impeachment story over?

 

Next week, barring witnesses. 

 

Then, of course, the dems will launch a new one as they've said they would. Because this isn't about truth or the constitution. It's a naked attempt to seize power through illegal means since they cannot win at the ballot box. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Correct. The Dems know, for certain, they cannot beat Trump at the ballot box. They also know, for certain, the Senate won't vote to remove. So what's this all about? What's the point of this show? 

 

It's to de-legitimize Trump's second term. 

 

That's it. 

 

And they're doing it, knowing full well how damaging and dangerous that kind of partisan warfare is. But they don't care. Because they're enemies of the republic, of truth, of justice, and our way of life. They crave power. And will do anything, legal or no, to obtain it again. 

 

***** them all.

How can't you understand that Trump is abusing power to influence the election. You can't even hear that argument? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

Just imagine how Trump will behave AFTER he gets acquitted.

Seriously, good luck keeping your head from exploding.  Maybe you should strap on a bucket to contain the inevitable mess of scalp, hair and brains.

 

 

 

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

There's never been an attack on Senators launched like yesterday from the floor of the Senate itself -- by sitting House members. 

 

It is different. It's more hostile. Thanks to the tactics deployed by the left/establishment. Who are trying their best to destroy the rule of law and our institutions -- while pointing the finger at 45 saying he's to blame for their actions. 

 

It's a kindergarten argument by Schiff/Nadler/Pelosi and their ilk. And it's going to cost them the House, Senate, and White House in November. It's going to be a slaughter at the ballot box. 

I hope so but I think this nonsense is being pursued in the hopes that the dems can take the Senate. It seems that they are trying to make senators take difficult votes. I'm hoping that they are as delusional as they appear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

Not allowing witnesses..  This is a trial right?  Witnesses are supposed to testify 

 

I'm starting to think it wasn't the topic that made TBD push you over to PPP.

 

I'm starting to think it's how quickly you are able to show how absolutely little you genuinely understand about what is going on.

 

I supposed next you're going to explain to us that it isn't the House that needs to prove their accusations for the impeachment, but rather it's the Senate that needs to prove the accusations wrong.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, snafu said:

Holy crap, Schiff just quoted George Washington about how over reliance party politics can ruin our democracy.

 

He quoted Reagan a few times too. There were Southern California news reports about an earthquake but it was determined that it was just Ronald Reagan turning over in his grave. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TH3 said:

Kinda thought that it was the Senates job to get to the truth...you know...the oath and all that


It is the role of the House to compile evidence, and then bring their case to the Senate.

 

It is the role of the Senate to hear the House’s fully established case, and render a verdict based on the evidence presented.

 

New evidence is not introduced during the Senate proceedings.  Witnesses are limited to those who testified during House proceedings in order to clarify, if necessary, existing evidence.

 

The House broke with this tradition, and did not do their jobs because they sought to restrict the President from having due process, did not wish to present fact witnesses of their own in order to protect narrative, and wanted to rush the process for political reasons.

 

Now they’re asking the Senate to break with tradition, and to do the job they failed to do in their rush to maximize political damage.

 

The Senate is telling them to pound sand.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...