Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
StHustle

Freddie Kitchens wore a "Pittsburgh Started It" t-shirt

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

He's not wrong.

Yes he is wrong.   

 

What started it was a late hit and then Garrett pulling Rudolph to the ground when the ball is already 20 yards downfield. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Skeptical 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is he, 9? They started it!!! 😅😅. This makes me appreciate McDermotts approach to things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, StHustle said:

More evidence this guy is out of his league. An NFL HC simply can't make such pathetic decisions.

 

Apparently his daughters bought it for him as a joke but him deciding to wear it in public, even taking pictures with fans wearing it was a total bone headed move. The makers of the shirt got ahold of the pic and used it for an advertising post 🤦🏽‍♂️

 

How embarrassing for the Browns organization.

 

https://es.pn/2LnTnX1

 

 

kitchens-pittsburgh-started-it.jpg

BarrenAlarmingKitten-small.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, StHustle said:

More evidence this guy is out of his league. An NFL HC simply can't make such pathetic decisions.

 

Apparently his daughters bought it for him as a joke but him deciding to wear it in public, even taking pictures with fans wearing it was a total bone headed move. The makers of the shirt got ahold of the pic and used it for an advertising post 🤦🏽‍♂️

 

How embarrassing for the Browns organization.

 

https://es.pn/2LnTnX1

 

 

kitchens-pittsburgh-started-it.jpg

Wow this guy is a complete moron. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

He's not wrong.

How is he "not wrong"??? 

 

I watched the play, Garrett 100% started it

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Skeptical 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

Still can’t believe we lost that game

They’ve beaten a few decent teams, including Baltimore. They have talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Okay... I will play.  Somebody tell me how Pittsburgh "started it."

 

Once again... Cleveland's whacked out sense of reality.  Remember their #1 nemesis was.Cincinnati.  Now it's Pittsburgh.  I am not even a Pittsburgh backer, I hate the place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

 

Okay... I will play.  Somebody tell me how Pittsburgh "started it."

 

Once again... Cleveland's whacked out sense of reality.  Remember their #1 nemesis was.Cincinnati.  Now it's Pittsburgh.  I am not even a Pittsburgh backer, I hate the place.

 

Ummm...unless Garrett can see out his ear hole you can't say he knew the ball was out of Rudolph's hands. No whistle was blown. No flag thrown. He didn't slam or drive him into the ground. He actually pulled Rudolph down on top of him. He was going for the sack title this year. What he did was a FOOTBALL PLAY. Rudolph getting upset and trying to rip off Garrett's helmet was the FIRST of the non football illegal actions that snowballed from there. That's how you can unequivocally say Rudolph started the fight. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, vincec said:

They’ve beaten a few decent teams, including Baltimore. They have talent.

Just the way it happened.   Should of won that one 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, StHustle said:

 

Ummm...unless Garrett can see out his ear hole you can't say he knew the ball was out of Rudolph's hands. No whistle was blown. No flag thrown. He didn't slam or drive him into the ground. He actually pulled Rudolph down on top of him. He was going for the sack title this year. What he did was a FOOTBALL PLAY. Rudolph getting upset and trying to rip off Garrett's helmet was the FIRST of the non football illegal actions that snowballed from there. That's how you can unequivocally say Rudolph started the fight. 

 

 

So it's okay to rip off Rudolph's helmet with a facemask move.

 

Mason: "Hey!  I want my helmet back, the NFL tells me it's important to my safety!"

 

Myles: "Here YOU go Mason my friend, BUT LET ME BEAT YOU OVER THE HEAD WITH IT FIRST!"

 

 

Guess what?  Escalation IS starting it!

 

Retaliatory behavior is the loser.

  • Meh 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And drop dead Fred Kitchens is escalating.

 

Who said Rudolph was taking off Garrett's helmet.  That's just a made up backstory.  When that didn't work, Garrett claimed a fake, made up racial slur too.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

So it's okay to rip off Rudolph's helmet with a facemask move.

 

Mason: "Hey!  I want my helmet back, the NFL tells me it's important to my safety!"

 

Myles: "Here YOU go Mason my friend, BUT LET ME BEAT YOU OVER THE HEAD WITH IT FIRST!"

 

 

Guess what?  Escalation IS starting it!

 

Retaliatory behavior is the loser.

 

Are we talking about who started the fight or who was more wrong in the fight? Garret clearly went overboard by hitting him with the helmet. WAY overboard and deserved what he got. Rudolph only deserved a fine like he got. But none of that changes the fact of who started it.

 

If I'm in a long line at the amusement park and some a-hole comes up and skips me, and I decide to punch him in the mouth, I STARTED THE FIGHT. Based on your logic you would say the other guy started the fight for skipping me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Reks Ryan said:

Yes he is wrong.   

 

What started it was a late hit and then Garrett pulling Rudolph to the ground when the ball is already 20 yards downfield. 

 

"Late hit" "pulling Rudolph to the ground" - You mean when Garrett laid Rudolph down on the ground as gently as a newborn baby?

 

Do you really think if Garrett truly wanted to hurt Rudolph with a late hit that he couldn't have effortlessly spiked him on his head like a rag doll?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, peterpan said:

How is he "not wrong"??? 

 

I watched the play, Garrett 100% started it

 

Garrett was playing football.

 

Rudolph was triggered by a somewhat late and needless (and gentle) take down and took out his frustrations of sucking on Garrett by pathetically attempting to rip his helmet off. 

 

Then Garrett obviously lost his mind and did some stupid *****.

 

But Rudolph isn't Mr. Innocent. He's a *****.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

So it's okay to rip off Rudolph's helmet with a facemask move.

 

Mason: "Hey!  I want my helmet back, the NFL tells me it's important to my safety!"

 

Myles: "Here YOU go Mason my friend, BUT LET ME BEAT YOU OVER THE HEAD WITH IT FIRST!"

 

 

Guess what?  Escalation IS starting it!

 

Retaliatory behavior is the loser.

Lol, this post is ridiculous. 

  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, StHustle said:

 

Are we talking about who started the fight or who was more wrong in the fight? Garret clearly went overboard by hitting him with the helmet. WAY overboard and deserved what he got. Rudolph only deserved a fine like he got. But none of that changes the fact of who started it.

 

If I'm in a long line at the amusement park and some a-hole comes up and skips me, and I decide to punch him in the mouth, I STARTED THE FIGHT. Based on your logic you would say the other guy started the fight for skipping me. 

Garrett skipped the line AND did the punching.  Rudolph was just standing in line.  But Rudolph went after him once it got started.  Can you blame him?

21 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

Lol, this post is ridiculous. 

As is Garrett's response in a winning game with 7 secs left.

 

Bye bye... You just lost your career and livelihood in a league that is a PRIVILEGE to play.  He should be banned for life.  

 

Next, a more deserving player!

 

THAT'S, ridiculous!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

"Late hit" "pulling Rudolph to the ground" - You mean when Garrett laid Rudolph down on the ground as gently as a newborn baby?

 

Do you really think if Garrett truly wanted to hurt Rudolph with a late hit that he couldn't have effortlessly spiked him on his head like a rag doll?

Classic.  You really are Wayne Arnold.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...