Jump to content

The Edward Gallagher Case


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

 

This obviously disturbed man is going to be at campaign events for Trump? That’s pretty dark and sends a message of violence. Trump should have let justice take its course here but he sees an opening to use this guy to send a message. 

 

Criminal allegations

Chief Gallagher was accused of multiple offenses during his final deployment to Iraq and during the Battle for Mosul. The most prominent accusation and the best-attested to was the murder of a prisoner of war, a war crime.[6] A captured young fighter of the Islamic State (also known as ISIL, ISIS, and Daesh) was being treated by a medic. According to two SEAL witnesses, Gallagher said over the radio "he's mine" and walked up to the medic and prisoner, and without saying a word killed the prisoner by stabbing him repeatedly with his hunting knife. Gallagher and his commanding officer, Lieutenant Jake Portier, then posed for photographs of them standing over the body with some other nearby SEALs. Gallagher then text messaged a fellow SEAL a picture of the dead captive with the explanation "Good story behind this, got him with my hunting knife.”[6]

Another accusation was that Gallagher's sniper work during his 2017 deployment became indiscriminate, reckless, and bloodthirsty. He allegedly fired his rifle far more frequently than other snipers;[2] according to testimony, the other snipers in the platoon did not consider him a good sniper, and he took "random shots" into buildings.[1] Other snipers said they witnessed Gallagher taking at least two militarily pointless shots, shooting and killing an unarmed old man in a white robe as well as a young girl walking with other girls. Gallagher allegedly boasted about the large number of people he had killed, claiming he averaged three kills a day over 80 days, including four women.[1] Gallagher also was reportedly known for indiscriminately spraying neighborhoods with rockets and machine gun fire with no known enemy force in the region.[6]

A charge of obstruction of justice was brought against Gallagher for alleged witness intimidation. According to the claim, Gallagher allegedly threatened to kill fellow SEALs if they reported his actions.[2] The Navy cited his text messages as attempting to undermine the investigation, with messages sent to "pass the word on those traitors", meaning cooperating witnesses, and to get them blacklisted within the special warfare community.[6][1] This resulted in him being confined in the brig for a time with heavy restrictions on his ability to communicate, although this confinement was later lessened.[2]

Gallagher was also charged with "nearly a dozen" lesser offenses.[2]

According to the original Navy prosecutor Chris Czaplak, "Chief Gallagher decided to act like the monster the terrorists accuse us of being. He handed ISIS propaganda manna from heaven. His actions are everything ISIS says we are."[3][2]

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

This obviously disturbed man is going to be at campaign events for Trump? That’s pretty dark and sends a message of violence. Trump should have let justice take its course here but he sees an opening to use this guy to send a message. 

 

 

 

Why was the original prosecutor removed from the case? Where is your link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:

Is this the case where the prosecution tried to put a wire on the defense, hacked the defenses emails (and read them), and where the prosecutor was removed for misconduct?  


 

 

that has a tendency to get a case wiped out completely

 

sucks if a perp walk free, but the system of justice entitles one to a legal investigation... 

 

that's what the D is for

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the only thing he was convicted on was posing for a photograph with a corpse.    And his sentence was a one-step reduction in rank and time served, because he'd already been incarcerated about twice as long as the maximum sentence for that charge.  

 

A reasonable person would wonder how that court martial got so ***** up as for that to be the result.  But by all means, pretend the real scandal is is restoration of rank to an E7.  You be you, @Tiberius.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

And the only thing he was convicted on was posing for a photograph with a corpse.    And his sentence was a one-step reduction in rank and time served, because he'd already been incarcerated about twice as long as the maximum sentence for that charge.  

 

A reasonable person would wonder how that court martial got so ***** up as for that to be the result.  But by all means, pretend the real scandal is is restoration of rank to an E7.  You be you, @Tiberius.

Lol, no the real scandal is this war criminal is going to campaign for the president. The only thing he got convicted of...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Lol, no the real scandal is this war criminal is going to campaign for the president. The only thing he got convicted of...

 

Really?  You're okay with him being acquitted of war crimes, but campaigning for Trump, that's the scandal?

 

It's a true wonder why no one takes you ***** seriously.  I hope you choke on Thanksgiving dinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

Really?  You're okay with him being acquitted of war crimes, but campaigning for Trump, that's the scandal?

 

It's a true wonder why no one takes you ***** seriously.  I hope you choke on Thanksgiving dinner.

Lol, hope the rest of your day goes better dude, you seem pretty miserable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Navy corruption and the Gallagher case

Navy Times, by Sean Gallagher

 

Original Article

 

In this partisan environment, people were quick to judge President Donald J. Trump’s reinstatement of anchors to my brother, Special Warfare Operator Chief Edward “Eddie” Gallagher. Out of the woodwork came former military attorneys, indignant Pentagon officials and your typical Washington establishment types. Their views were mainly the same. The president’s actions were a moral hazard! What message will it send our troops? What of good order and discipline? I have one question for these people: Where in the hell were you the past year and a half?

 

Eddie’s case and court-martial trial revealed a massive cancer within the military justice system, doing irreparable damage to troop morale that may last decades.

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...