Jump to content

Next two weeks tell us all we need to know


Mikie2times

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, BmarvB said:

They're going to have hell on their hands with the Broncos, then there's the murderers row with 3 straight division leaders (Dallas, Baltimore and New England). going 2-2 in that stretch would be nice. We won't beat the Ravens and the Pats still own the AFC East. Cowboys can be had but they're going to be looking to avoid losing two in a row after this upcoming loss to the Patriots. The best we'll do here is a split over the next 4 games. Here's where the truth gets told about what kind of team the Bills really are.

I think the Cowboys beat the patriots and then suffer a let down game against the Bills. That’s how the two and two record happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Augie said:

I get it. They are two very challenging games. 

 

All we need to know? With respect, I see them as two games. As always I’ll hope for the best, but know it’s not defining our future. Important to this season indeed, but we could still bounce back with a loss or two.

 

Agreed.

 

The thing is, people are seeing the Broncos as a must-win game assuming we need 3 more wins, and those wins should be Denver, Steelers, and Jets.

But if we're not good enough to take out a better-quality team such as Dallas, NE, or the Ravens, we're not good enough to go very far in the playoffs anyway.

 

They will be tough games, but if we don't have the hosses to win one of the latter, we don't have the hosses for playoffs either.  If we lose to Denver it's still possible we could take out one of the better teams (we came close with NE despite 4 INTs) and get to the same place.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NickelCity said:

Looking at the schedule, it's hard not to view the broncos game in particular as pivotal. 


Agree.  If we need a minimum of 3 wins in our last 6 games, this is one we need.  That’s based on it being one of the 3 easier games (relatively speaking).  If we drop it, then we have to pick up a W against a tougher team.

 

The Pittsburgh game is really important.  They’ve got a relatively easy schedule and a loss to us could potentially knock them out on record or tiebreaker.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

The thing is, people are seeing the Broncos as a must-win game assuming we need 3 more wins, and those wins should be Denver, Steelers, and Jets.

But if we're not good enough to take out a better-quality team such as Dallas, NE, or the Ravens, we're not good enough to go very far in the playoffs anyway.

 

They will be tough games, but if we don't have the hosses to win one of the latter, we don't have the hosses for playoffs either.  If we lose to Denver it's still possible we could take out one of the better teams (we came close with NE despite 4 INTs) and get to the same place.

 

Right. If they can't play head to head with teams like Baltimore, Dallas, and New England (and they did come close with NE despite an offensive meltdown), then they are not ready to go very deep in the playoffs. This will be an interesting stretch and I wonder if they are going to keep Daboll in the booth and go more uptempo?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

Right. If they can't play head to head with teams like Baltimore, Dallas, and New England (and they did come close with NE despite an offensive meltdown), then they are not ready to go very deep in the playoffs. This will be an interesting stretch and I wonder if they are going to keep Daboll in the booth and go more uptempo?

 

If I'm reading between the lines correctly, I think there have been several issues:

1) Daboll being slow to get plays in at times and having play calls that are too complex in nomenclature.  Josh needs the extra time to process at this point.

2) Daboll expecting a higher level of speed/sophistication in reading the D/knowing where to go than Josh can deliver quite yet against fierce pressure .  I think Josh is very very good in the film room, on the boards, and also when he has more time, and that leads Daboll to write checks Josh can't quite cash at times

3) Using as many players as possible in varied roles so as to create confusion on the D, also creates more confusion on the O as Allen has to dilute his reps and establish clear communication with all those guys instead of focusing on 5-6 best offensive playmakers.  And it winds up with crap that scares no one like DiMarco and Smith out wide.

 

I think McDermott put it to Daboll that perhaps going to the booth would help with faster play calling and coming to the line quickly would potentially also allow him to help Josh decode the D on occasion (issues 1 and 2). 

 

But coincidentally, going up-tempo also forces us to keep the same personnel on the field more of the time, and I think that's helpful to Josh as long as we mix things up otherwise.

 

So I hope we keep it up.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I agree these games are important but I don’t think Denver is an extremely tough matchup. Denver is a very good him home team and a poor road team who just happened to play the Vikes tough because Fangio knew them inside and out. They have a kid at QB who will not fare well in our house IMO.

 

After this week, I actually find Thursday to be a potential barometer game. There is the potential Dallas beats the Pats and even if they don’t I think they come in very over-confident. Their Defense has been porous lately and they rarely play a QB with Josh’s mobility. I think how Josh handles the big national stage is the major question mark. He didn’t seem to deal with it well against the Pats, but then again it is the best defense in the league by far. My gut is telling me that if Josh keeps his composure and doesn’t throw more than 1 pick Thursday we could win that game. It’s an unknown because we have played no national games with meaning, so how this whole team reacts to that pressure is yet to be seen. Does Dawson Knox or Singletary or Edmonds or Oliver or Ford play better or worse when the big game shows up. We will find out soon enough. 

Edited by Locomark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said:

Agree with the OP.  Denver is not a good matchup for us.  Our weaknesses play into their biggest strengths.  I expect a low scoring dogfight.  

Yeah I wouldn't be surprised with a 13-10 type game.. much like Titans last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically next 3 weeks....

 

Beat Denver is a must....

 

Beat Dallas we have a solid chance of Making the playoffs.

 

Beat Baltimore, we make the playoffs and have more confidence know we just beat one of the top 4 teams in the NFL, why not a SB championship mindset!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems like there is one group fans convinced that every team we play is better than their record indicates. 

another group of fans seem to think we only play powder puffs. 

 

I am in the category that by week 11, a good team playing at home should be expected to beat beat a 3-7 team who only has 1 road game as a fairly routine matter. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Agreed.

 

The thing is, people are seeing the Broncos as a must-win game assuming we need 3 more wins, and those wins should be Denver, Steelers, and Jets.

But if we're not good enough to take out a better-quality team such as Dallas, NE, or the Ravens, we're not good enough to go very far in the playoffs anyway.

 

They will be tough games, but if we don't have the hosses to win one of the latter, we don't have the hosses for playoffs either.  If we lose to Denver it's still possible we could take out one of the better teams (we came close with NE despite 4 INTs) and get to the same place.

 

 

 

I semi agree with what you are saying.  This is not necessarily true though.  The playoffs can be a different beast.  We showed already that we can hang with the Pats at least.

 

Example.  First Giants superbowl they beat the Pats.  During the season the Giants lost to the Pats, GB, and both Dallas games.  Not just lost but lost badly against Dallas and GB.  Beat both those teams in the playoffs and beat NE.

 

In the next superbowl run the Giants lost to GB and SF during the season and beat them both in the playoffs.

 

So while I do agree that if we cant show we can hang with these teams it is unlikely we belong in a playoff game... the playoffs are a different animal.  You can lose to a team one week and beat them the next.  I would love to at least beat NE.  Dallas I don't really care about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Agreed.

 

The thing is, people are seeing the Broncos as a must-win game assuming we need 3 more wins, and those wins should be Denver, Steelers, and Jets.

But if we're not good enough to take out a better-quality team such as Dallas, NE, or the Ravens, we're not good enough to go very far in the playoffs anyway.

 

They will be tough games, but if we don't have the hosses to win one of the latter, we don't have the hosses for playoffs either.  If we lose to Denver it's still possible we could take out one of the better teams (we came close with NE despite 4 INTs) and get to the same place.

 

 

This team looks like a team destined to lose its first playoff game, whatever it is, wherever it is, assuming we make the playoffs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just watched the Denver/Minnesota game and Denver looks good in a lot of areas. Their defense is fast and hard hitting. They beat up on Dalvin Cook. 

 

I think this is two tough games for the Bills, and your're right, how they play will tell us much more whether they are for real.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chaos said:

seems like there is one group fans convinced that every team we play is better than their record indicates. 

another group of fans seem to think we only play powder puffs. 

 

I am in the category that by week 11, a good team playing at home should be expected to beat beat a 3-7 team who only has 1 road game as a fairly routine matter. 

I expect it to be very polarizing. Pretty much every advanced model used to forecast future success has Buffalo very poorly rated. Most well below even the lowly 3-7 Broncos. They have us rated below Cleveland. It seems to me the more these simulations play out, the more it turns into see the advanced stats were right. Then a win like last week and it’s see we are that good, but the advanced stat guys are like, ugh, this is another powder puff.  As usual the truth is somewhere in the middle. Look at the line movement on this game if you want a clear picture of exactly what I'm saying. Started off -5 and got immediately dropped to -4 and will close at -3. So what you got is the record driven thinkers/perception off record driving the opening number. Then the advanced guys driving it down. Handicappers do not care very much about records, in fact they want teams like Buffalo to have a following and become a popular bet only to fade the hell out of them if the data indicates a regression. I can say to a certainty the data indicates a regression, that doesn't mean it will occur, it's just the data. I can say for Denver it indicates a progression. If you care about that or not, that’s each fans perspective. Just as how much or little the fan base reacts to one game or a series of games. How much they factor in record, base stats, advanced stats and opponents. So on, so forth. 

Edited by KzooMike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...