Jump to content
Deranged Rhino

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG

Recommended Posts


https://mobile.twitter.com/BuckSexton/status/1194629102222761985

 

Of course it’s fine. “Don’t worry about what we do, it’s what ORANGE MAN BAD does that matters!”

 

BobGarTibs of the world. 
 

Most realize the truth of the following statement: if your posts are being supported by BobTibGar (or the multiple alts Gar has had to use), chances are you’re not only incorrect but wildly so. 

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

There hasn't been an impeachment charge yet Idaho

 

So let me get this straight: there are no charges for impeachment, but all the witnesses so far have given evidence of...what, exactly?

 

What is the evidence and what is it designed to prove that the president did wrong?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IDBillzFan said:

 

So let me get this straight: there are no charges for impeachment, but all the witnesses so far have given evidence of...what, exactly?

 

What is the evidence and what is it designed to prove that the president did wrong?

 

 

The two witnesses yesterday gave over 5 hours of evidence. There are more witnesses tomorrow and next week who will give dozens more hours of testimony and evidence. 

 

Your question makes no grammatical sense after the first 5 words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Bob again proving he’s ignorant of what’s actually happening while he breathlessly supports a partisan impeachment scam — which will only make the country more divided, more unstable, and sets a dangerous precedent for future holders of the office. 
 

But Bob doesn’t care about that! He’s been programmed to resist anything that runs counter to “ORANGE MAN BAD!” — even if that puts the future of the republic at risk. 

 

DR honey, I can tell that you are cranky again.  Did you not sleep again last night?  Have you considered my suggestion to take some time off from this project?  In the long run, it may clear your head so that you can again act sanely when you get out and hopefully back to work.   
 
I noticed at one point recently that you were the most recent poster in about 8 threads at once.  When I spot checked I also saw that in addition, you had strung 3 and 4 posts in a row in several of those threads.  Not drug use?  OK.  Not mania?  Well, ok but then why the manic activity and the need to control every discussion? 
 
Maybe you can discuss this issue in group this week or perhaps we have some mental health folks around here that will weigh in.  Can anyone help DR? Anyway, good luck with your challenges and let us know when you get released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

So let me get this straight: there are no charges for impeachment, but all the witnesses so far have given evidence of...what, exactly?

 

What is the evidence and what is it designed to prove that the president did wrong?

 


Gar knows the process is crooked and sets a dangerous precedent. He knows it’s purely partisan driven by those who fear they can’t beat Trump at the ballot box in 2020 (and they can’t). 
 

He just doesn’t care. 
 

Because he is a man who lacks principles and does not have an honest bone in his body. 
 

It would be sad if it wasn’t so funny to watch him implode every 30 days or so and run to a new alt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

The two witnesses yesterday gave over 5 hours of evidence. There are more witnesses tomorrow and next week who will give dozens more hours of testimony and evidence. 

 

Your question makes no grammatical sense after the first 5 words.

 

Evidence of what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, row_33 said:

anything worthwhile today?

 

image.png.722c67342a0ed9e8c2a196134b03852d.png

 

Today is a day of rest (and a Democratic "WTF happened to our master plan yesterday?!" frantic meeting). Tune in tomorrow for tears.

  • Haha (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IDBillzFan said:

 

Evidence of what?

 

It's up to you to either bury your head in the sand or watch the hearings and form an opinion on the evidence given. I'm not going to spoon feed you, Idaho. You're an adult, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bob in Mich said:

 

DR honey, I can tell that you are cranky again.  


Not cranky at all. But when someone advocates for a process that endangers the republic for purely partisan reasons, as you’ve done all morning, I will call it out. 
 

So others can see what a fool you are and how dangerous your ideas are to the longevity of our nation. 
 

Don’t like that, then stop parroting the words of proven liars and pedo protectors because you can’t get over your rampant TDS. 
 

Simple. 

1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Evidence of what?


Second, third, and forth hand hearsay. 
 

But that’s enough for Gar because he doesn’t value due process, truth, or this country. He wants to watch it be burned to its roots — because he’s a child who never bothered to learn how to think for himself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:


Not cranky at all. But when someone advocates for a process that endangers the republic for purely partisan reasons, as you’ve done all morning, I will call it out. 
 

So others can see what a fool you are and how dangerous your ideas are to the longevity of our nation. 
 

Don’t like that, then stop parroting the words of proven liars and pedo protectors because you can’t get over your rampant TDS. 
 

Simple. 

 

Lovers quarrel - when's the wedding date?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

lol, so guilty till proven innocent. 

 

 

He has been proven guilty. Just like OJ was, it's just that people are blinded by bias 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

Lovers quarrel - when's the wedding date?

 

Gary, you seem like a perceptive guy but your take on this is waaaay off.  You are witnessing an attempt at an intervention.  DR is still denying that he has a problem.  Sometimes it can be a long process, especially when the delusions are so ingrained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Thinking that Bob supports -- the same guy who just advocated for a purely partisan impeachment process just to "check" a president who's popular within his own party, without any thought or regard to the dangerous precedent that sets. Why does Bob push this? Because he was programmed to like a good lil' NPC bot. He doesn't think ahead to when a democrat regains the Oval and how this same process will be used against them -- imploding any hope for our republic's future. 

 

 

Soon he'll be pushing this talking point in some form. Due process is a republican talking point... 

Like not trusting the IC is now a "republican" talking point...

Like how not wanting MORE regime change wars is now a "republican" talking point...

 

Blind partisans have only one goal: power. Regardless of what it costs them. 

Nancy is the small one. She needs to go to AA.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bob in Mich said:

 

Gary, you seem like a perceptive guy but your take on this is waaaay off.  You are witnessing an attempt at an intervention.  DR is still denying that he has a problem.  Sometimes it can be a long process, especially when the delusions are so ingrained.

 

True - plus I don't think it's legal to marry a bot yet, is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nunes should bring in a boom box and when the "witnesses" start talking, play at a low level  REO Speedwagon's   "Take it On The Run. 

 

Edited by Wacka
  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

It's up to you to either bury your head in the sand or watch the hearings and form an opinion on the evidence given. I'm not going to spoon feed you, Idaho. You're an adult, right?

 

Perhaps you should let @TH3 answer the questions I asked him, and you stick to what you do; make grade-school comments at other posters.

 

@TH3I'll ask you again; what are the Dems trying to prove Trump did wrong, and what is the evidence that proves their case?

 

You argue that people are just posting twitter posts and not using independent thinking. Show me your independent thinking so I can see what you see in these hearings.

 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

Today is a day of rest (and a Democratic "WTF happened to our master plan yesterday?!" frantic meeting). Tune in tomorrow for tears.


Tomorrow  will be interesting.  Here is the list testifying.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IDBillzFan said:

 

Perhaps you should let @TH3 answer the questions I asked him, and you stick to what you do; make grade-school comments at other posters.

 

@TH3I'll ask you again; what are the Dems trying to prove Trump did wrong, and what is the evidence that proves their case?

 

You argue that people are just posting twitter posts and not using independent thinking. Show me your independent thinking so I can see what you see in these hearings.

 

 

My independent thinking is going to wait for the hearings to be over before I have a full opinion. I'm going to, like, weigh the evidence, man!

 

Day 1 was interesting but it's going to come down to Sondland's testimony to corroborate what was said. 

Just now, IDBillzFan said:

 

Perhaps you should let @TH3 answer the questions I asked him, and you stick to what you do; make grade-school comments at other posters.

 

@TH3I'll ask you again; what are the Dems trying to prove Trump did wrong, and what is the evidence that proves their case?

 

You argue that people are just posting twitter posts and not using independent thinking. Show me your independent thinking so I can see what you see in these hearings.

 

 

My independent thinking is going to wait for the hearings to be over before I have a full opinion. I'm going to, like, weigh the evidence, man!

 

Day 1 was interesting but it's going to come down to Sondland's testimony to corroborate what was said. 

 

Also DR is a bot - not a poster. And it gets what it dishes out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Hey deranged, Canadian interested in your American sh*t show. I am curious about what you mean re: the threat to your republic? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

True - plus I don't think it's legal to marry a bot yet, is it?

 

I don't think DR's a bot.  His feelings get hurt too easily to be robotic. 

 

I am beginning to think that he enlists others at the institution to all pitch in to push out his torrents of crap.  How else could it all appear so quickly while at the same time sounding so insane?  I don't know, maybe not.  I am still working on it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

My independent thinking is going to wait for the hearings to be over before I have a full opinion. I'm going to, like, weigh the evidence, man!

 

Day 1 was interesting but it's going to come down to Sondland's testimony to corroborate what was said. 

 

Also DR is a bot - not a poster. And it gets what it dishes out.

 

Either let @TH3 answer, or pick a single username and try to stick with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

Good Post.  I disagree on several fronts but, well stated.  I am an Independent but have been of the opinion that this impeachment process should move forward.  Most certainly, it is a political process that only loosely resembles assembling charges or putting on a criminal trial.  Those that are unaware may be honestly upset but those knowledgeable of the process should stop throwing out this chaff.

 

There's zero evidence of a crime, whether it is a high crime or a misdemeanor.  That makes this strictly political.  Saying this is political is not a "chaff" statement.  When Schiff analogized the "investigation" to a Grand Jury, he brought a criminal element into the process.  Partisans have been banging the "attempted extortion" and "attempted bribery" drum.  So expecting things to go like a criminal proceeding isn't a "chaff" statement, either.  The fact that the two most recent Impeachments were run in a totally different, bipartisan way is also a disheartening contrast to what's going on now.

 

 

2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

Claiming it is one-sided is true but there are 2 main reasons for that.  I am sure that you are aware that this is not really yet the trial phase.  That will happen in the Senate.  In this phase, Democratic 'prosecutors' are making their case to bring charges to the representatives in the House.  The House will likely eventually vote to (or not to) send the charges to the Senate for the trial phase.  I believe that the defense will then be able to call whoever they wish, especially since the Republicans control the Senate.

 

When you've got "investigators" knocking on your door looking at what you've done, wouldn't you want them to talk to anyone and everyone involved in the matter?  Maybe they figure out that what they suspect you of doing isn't worthy of pursuing.  That's not what's happening here.  This is a one-sided kabuki show meant to influence 2020 voters.  Nothing more.  Like I said in my prior post, this is meant to carry on as long as possible in order to run as deep as possible into the election cycle.  Republicans on the Committee have requested several witnesses to be called.  Schiff shot down every one of them.  These are supposed to be people investigating the matter -- NOT building a case.  Otherwise, Pelosi and Schiff should stop lying about the process and stop calling it an "investigation".

 

 

2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

The other reason we don't have the Republican side of the story is that the President's defenders have defied subpeonas to testify to the House committees.  There were no transcripts released from the president's soldiers because they are afraid to go under oath and testify, just like their leader.   It seems to me that they are afraid of perjury.  Would you want to get folks under oath speaking on your behalf if you were guilty?  How about if you were innocent?  Those answers should be telling to an unbiased observer.

 

There are many reasons why someone would not come forward, but refusals are mainly based upon privilege.  You can read whatever you want into a refusal to testify, but the focus is foreign policy.  That's not coffee talk.  Also, and more important, the phone transcript speaks for itself.  It has been out in the public for nearly two months.  In fact, I think the White House released another transcript related to a prior phone call.  Do you know what might help us understand things a bit more clearly:  the Whistleblower.  Who did he get his information from about the call?  He never heard it.  Someone thought it was a funky situation and reported his or her concerns to THAT guy?  Why him?  There were 14 or so people on the call.  How many thought it was a big deal?  Too bad we won't get to hear from the Whistleblower, huh?  Funny how it is only Schiff who controls whether he testifies or not.

 

Too many people in Congress have concluded that Trump did something wrong, even though there's an "investigation" going on.  The "investigation" is more designed to be confirmation of partisan conclusions.  I think Congress should just issue Articles already and get to the vote.

 

 

3 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

Presidents have historically overstepped their authority, that is true.  Differences here are that Trump's actions appear to be for personal political gain, as opposed to being in the interests of our country.  He also continues to see election interference by foreigners as acceptable.  He has repeatedly proved that point.  Foreign election interference taints the upcoming election.  That must be stopped cold. 

 

I disagree with your statement here, completely.  Stop clutching your pearls over this.  Is election interference wrong -- of course.  Has that stopped anyone before -- no.  Off the top of my head, I can think of four historical examples of calling on a foreign nation or individual to assist a Presidential candidate:  Nixon/Vietnam; Ted Kennedy/Soviets; Obama/Russians; Hillary/Steele-Russians.  Only if it turns out to be true,  the only difference  this time is #orangemanbad.

 

 

3 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

Perhaps if the Congressional Republicans had a spine to stand up to this president, the whole impeachment process would be unnecessary.  As it is today, there appears to me to be a severe integrity shortage in the Republican party in Congress.

 

What "spine" do you want Congressional Republicans to assert?  Rolling over to this absolute sham would be spineless.  Standing up to it is commendable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thanks! (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

So let me get this straight: there are no charges for impeachment, but all the witnesses so far have given evidence of...what, exactly?

 

What is the evidence and what is it designed to prove that the president did wrong?

 

 

i'm sure any of us could round up a real case with evidence against  The Donald in a week or so

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hedge said:

 

 

 


I cannot believe his attorneys have not told him to STFU. And if they have, he's a very stupid man for not listening to that advice.

 

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...