Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hedge said:

 

Adding this to what has already been mentioned...Pelosi's son had his hand in the Ukraine cookie jar. Queued up below for a brief overview:

 

 

Also, you can watch from about the 1 minute mark to hear what else is alleged against him (defrauding property and weaponizing CPS to have her children removed).


Well, that explains a lot.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Ah, there's the rub.  The subpoenas are still enforceable, because the hold isn't valid if it's issued by a clone of a Supreme Court justice.

 

The Democrats are playing checkers while Trump plays chess while the Democrats play five-dimensional parcheesi.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WSJ Columnist: Adam Schiff’s Secret Subpoena Adventure Could End with Legal Buckshot in His Face

 by Matt Vespa

Original Article

 

 

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), high Chancellor of the Trump impeachment effort, might be getting away with murder. The impeachment circus that has engulfed D.C. has overshadowed the House Intelligence Committee chair’s egregious abuse of power. He executed a secret subpoenas adventure of phone records of prominent Republicans. He got their phone records and published them in the committee’s 300-page impeachment report. Now, the report is a work of fiction. Schiff is a liar, and nothing from House Democrats on this whole fiasco should be believed. 

 

 

 

 

Screen-Shot-2019-12-04-at-7.52.56-PM.png

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NADLER SAYS HOUSE CAN READ TRUMP’S MIND, THEN IMPEACH HIM:

 

It’s an extraordinary claim in the House Judiciary Committee’s just released report on the constitutional grounds for impeachment.

 

You will find it on page six in the graph beginning “Fourth” where it is stated that: “The question is not whether the President’s conduct could have resulted from permissible motives. It is whether the President’s real reasons, the ones in his mind at the time, were legitimate. Where the House discovers persuasive evidence of corrupt wrongdoing, it is entitled to rely upon that evidence to impeach.”

 

 

 

.

 

 

.
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...