Dr. Who Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 50 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Kirk > Picard I don't think this is the progressive default position. Also, I'm not really comfortable with you being correct about something. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Correct: If America liked that type or person, Hillary would be president. Thankfully for the world, she never will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Love it. A Trump supporter complaing about corruption. Did you get a degree at Trump U? Are you a Libertarian? not that it matters, but Ivy League. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Ten bucks says Guy Reschenthaler thinks Jerry Sandusky was unfairly convicted. What a fratbro douche. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 #Boomerang 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I'd like to take this moment to congratulate Ben Cline for placing third on his high school debate team tonight... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: #Boomerang So, it's now guilty until proven innocent? Ok, got it. Pelosi has to lay off the freaking bottle. Being drunk with loose dentures is no way for an old person to go into their twilight years. 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: No it's more like trying to teach imbeciles 2+2=4 and the Trump supporters just answer, No! 2x2 =4 so Trump can't be guilty These Democrats think 1 and 1 is 57, so what's the fvcking difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I gotta give credit to the Dems for this again. They have singe handedly exposed two professions as frauds: federally elected officials and the bureaucracy AND overeducated useless people kudos!! ? the longer this continues, the more people are waking up. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 ...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 10 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced..... Payback will make this seem like a walk in the park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, row_33 said: Payback will make this seem like a walk in the park ...LMAO....not an 'effin chance.....they will twist the need to delve into the children to expose the root cause of Trump's dirty deeds, misgivings, failed family life/child upbringing to arrive as the dastardly SOB we're dealing with today..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I was going to post the other day, when I heard that Jonathan Turley was going to appear, that he's an excellent and balanced law prof and that they made a mistake inviting him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Gomer Pyle couldn’t get a word in at the end there? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) 42 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...LMAO....not an 'effin chance.....they will twist the need to delve into the children to expose the root cause of Trump's dirty deeds, misgivings, failed family life/child upbringing to arrive as the dastardly SOB we're dealing with today..... No... trump will win in 2020 and with a GOP house will rain a total ***** storm on the Dems in revenge Edited December 4, 2019 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: No... trump will win in 2020 and with a GOP house will rain a total ***** strol in the Dems in revenge 1945: the Statue of Liberty is kaput! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced..... No, not what happened. Again: she attacked Trump for naming him "Barron" and violating the Constitutional prohibition against titles of nobility, which is not only not "attacking Trump's kid," but is infinitely stupider than that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts