The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG

[RochesterRob]

2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

If your description of Trump is true, then how pathetic are the Democrats that they just can't beat him?

  Tiberius's inner thoughts betray him.  He is finished here as a paid sycophant.  He can no longer peddle Biden or Warren with an admission such as that.  

27 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There is no rational alternative to Trump. He’s just the best this country can do. ?

 

A racist man-child, who is completely incompetent, corrupt and beholden to Putin..h mmm. 

 

 

Pence could do a a better job, imo 

 

 

So could Hillary, and my cat. George, my goofy neighbor, too. Heck, @westside2 would be better 

 

  Let the echo of "He's (Trump) just the best this country can do" be heard through out the land.

[row_33]

22 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

Yes, I know. Only when Trump does something precedent becomes a unique, treasonous event.

when Republicans do it

 

 

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Glad you want me around! 

 

As Trumps president sinks deeper in the swirling bowl, you guys will need someone to vent to. I will be here for you!  

 

And double standards? Biden is corrupt but the Acosta child raping Epstein thing is nothing? Ya right! 

 

Just admit it, Trump is the worst scum bag by a mile. Even if Biden robbed a bank at gun point, that still doesn’t beat the Trump/Epstein/Acosta corruption. 

 

Oh ya, and the impeachment corruption...almost forgot about that, lol 

I’ll say this, it’s pretty remarkable how little the country is paying attention to this impeachment. Local newspapers are barley covering it. When the Clinton bj thing happened, the corporate press was going wild. 

Now that's a waste of good food.

[Doc]

Why does he keep bringing-up Acosta?  Especially when Epstein was Bill and Hill's BFF.

[Tiberius]

24 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

If your description of Trump is true, then how pathetic are the Democrats that they just can't beat him?

He beat all the Republicans first. And you can’t argue with the fact that Hillary got more votes, she did. Blame the founding fathers, the Democrats did all they could to keep this idiot out of government. 

 

You guys should have nominated a decent candidate 

5 minutes ago, Doc said:

Why does he keep bringing-up Acosta?  Especially when Epstein was Bill and Hill's BFF.

Trump appointed him to the cabinet even after (more probably because) it was well known the guy got Epstein out of jail to rape more children. 

 

You have to agree thats terrible.

Edited November 16, 2019 by Tiberius

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

46 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There is no rational alternative to Trump. He’s just the best this country can do. ?

 

A racist man-child, who is completely incompetent, corrupt and beholden to Putin..h mmm. 

 

 

Pence could do a a better job, imo 

 

 

So could Hillary, and my cat. George, my goofy neighbor, too. Heck, @westside2 would be better 

 

 

 

...doesn't continually talking out of your arse cause irritable bowel syndrome?......

[RochesterRob]

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

He beat all the Republicans first. And you can’t argue with the fact that Hillary got more votes, she did. Blame the founding fathers, the Democrats did all they could to keep this idiot out of government. 

 

You guys should have nominated a decent candidate 

Trump appointed him to the cabinet even after (more probably because) it was well known he guy got Epstein out of jail to rape more children. 

 

You have to agree thats terrible.

  Actually, you can argue with that.  1.6 million illegitimate votes in LA alone.  Your hysteria is very evident.  Saying Acosta 20 X per day is not going to help you.  Time for you to move away from the false gods that you worship.  

[WhitewalkerInPhilly]

Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far.

 

1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur.

 

2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 

 

3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president.

 

And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that?

[Buffalo_Gal]

This Financial Times article published August 28, 2016 shows everyone and their brother knew the Ukraine favored Hillary over Trump and was working to bring about Hillary's election by any means possible.  Yovanovitch was sworn in on August 12, 2016, and presented her credentials on August 29, 2016.

What was it she testified to yesterday ? 

[3rdnlng]

Did someone open a bottle of catnip oil here in PPP? All of the pussies seem to be showing up.

 

 

That wasn't directed at you BG.

Edited November 16, 2019 by 3rdnlng

[Buffalo_Gal]

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

Did someone open a bottle of catnip oil here in PPP? All of the pussies seem to be showing up.

I notice people either show up in droves hoping to push a narrative, disappear because the chosen narrative is being destroyed, or just come down to troll. It doesn't help that so many seem to enjoy trolling the trolls right back. ?‍♀️  Ignore is your friend. 

[Koko78]

37 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

...the Democrats did all they could to keep this idiot out of government.

 

All those listed flaws, yet the Democrats still can't beat him. Couldn't beat him in 2016. Can't beat him in 2020.

 

Pathetic.

[Figster]

9 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far.

 

1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur.

 

2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 

 

3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president.

 

And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that?

I can agree with that

 

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

This Financial Times article published August 28, 2016 shows everyone and their brother knew the Ukraine favored Hillary over Trump and was working to bring about Hillary's election by any means possible.  Yovanovitch was sworn in on August 12, 2016, and presented her credentials on August 29, 2016.

What was it she testified to yesterday ? 

So on one hand we have an administration willing enough to take a stand against Russian oppression, another that offers blankets by way of comfort and protection.

 

Whom do you suppose Russia would favor, and its not a surprise Hillary feels compelled to join the race IMO. 

[Koko78]

19 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far.

 

1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur.

 

2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 

 

3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president.

 

And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that?

 

Well, the NPCs certainly got their most recent programming update...

[WhitewalkerInPhilly]

A quick summary of Trump defenses for those playing at home:

 

-It's all hearsay, which is why we are forbidding the people who would have direct knowledge from testifying under oath.

 

-It wasn't a quid pro quo, we just asked for a favor in return for something.

 

-So what if it was a quid pro quo, everyone does it, which is why we disguised it.

 

-What we really care about is getting rid of corruption, which is why got rid of the diplomat who was getting rid of corruption. By the way, why do people care about Trump awarding himself the bid for a summit? That was totally aboveboard and deserves no one looking into it. Also, lets ignore the EPA chief he appointed with a stunning track record of corruption that he refused to fire.

 

-So what if he got rid of an ambassador! He has the absolute right to dismiss them for being Deep State Never Trumpers who he selected for their jobs. Stable genius.

 

-We gave them the money anyway, so there is no reason to think there was any extortion. See, there it is, being released, right after reports arrived in the press that we were extorting them.

 

I would say this is Marx brothers level material, but people here would accuse me of associating with a communist. ?

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Did someone open a bottle of catnip oil here in PPP? All of the people who get ***** pussies seem to be showing up.

 

 

That wasn't directed at you BG.

Aww we missed you too. And fixed it for you, common mistake.

 

 No, it's because current events have made us laugh us out of the stunned silence at the MAGA denials.

8 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, the NPCs certainly got their most recent programming update...

 

You bet! Can you believe the absolute trash the Trump fans are buying?

 

*realized who he is talking to*

 

*walks backward slowly*

[Doc]

57 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump appointed him to the cabinet even after (more probably because) it was well known the guy got Epstein out of jail to rape more children. 

 

You have to agree thats terrible.

you know what’s worse? Bills flying on Epstein‘s plane dozens of times doing who knows what.  And Hillary likely knowing what was going on.

 

As for Acosta, he had to do what his puppet masters told him to do. For obvious reasons.

[Rob's House]

8 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far.

 

1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur.

 

2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 

 

3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president.

 

And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that?

 

Can we also agree that the Trump is Hitler cult doesn't give half a sh!t whether the President squeezed Ukraine for info on Biden, and that all the impeachment nonsense is political theater?

[Doc]

1 minute ago, Rob's House said:

 

Can we also agree that the Trump is Hitler cult doesn't give half a sh!t whether the President squeezed Ukraine for info on Biden, and that all the impeachment nonsense is political theater?

Or that the Dems tried to make up dirt on Trump and entrap him in order to remove him from office?

[Westside]

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 

Acosta? You know that is all dirty right? The guy got a child predator off easy and Trump appointed him to the cabinet! That’s sick, don’t you agree? 

 

Coming from someone who laughed at the Americans who died in Benghazi, I find your outrage over Acosta full of schiff. Spare me your moral outrage, since you've never shown to have any morals before. 

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

38 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Having watched and listened to as much testimony as I could I have drawn a few conclusions so far.

 

1) Donald Trump absolutely used the power of his office to steer an investigation to investigate a political rival, no matter what fallout might occur.

 

2) The MAGA cult doesn't give a *****. 

 

3) Because the MAGA cult doesn't give a *****, there is about a 0% chance that the Senate will remove the president.

 

And everyone has pretty much known this. Everything the Dems are doing isn't to try to actually change minds, or get Trump out of office. It's about making the case for 2020, and everyone know it. Can we at least agree to that?

 

 

...how exactly would you define MAGA?.....is "make America great again" a fallacious ruse?.....did he seek the presidency for power, substanial salary, wealth, a book deal, his own library and free transportation on Air Force One and Marine One?....how many times has the fickle electorate yearned for a "Washington outsider" to clean up the stench?.....and how many times have "Washington insiders" run fraudulently as "outsiders" to no avail?....so we finally get a real "Washington outsider" who is crass, abrupt, condescending, abrasive, abusive, irascible, etc and is doing exactly what the establishment "good 'ol boyz network" needed?.....isn't it upside down on its ugly head?....haven't we found out so far that the "world's greatest democracy" has been exposed to unparalleled graft, corruption, misuse, abuse, subversive underhanded political partisanship, etc?....the same squeaky clean democracy we've tried to force feed on nations ripe with political corruption?...kinda like the "pot calling the kettle black"?.....so now we have the progressives continually on the attack to tear down this repugnant, imperialist nation, making us the world's apologists, destroying capitalism in favor of socialism to dilute the concentration of power with handouts to the "gimme crowd" so deserving.....where exactly do you stand on these issues, for or against?...just curious............