Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

Just now, Rob's House said:

 

It doesn't have anything to do with anything. It's the equivalent of Johnny Cochran telling the jury "look at the little monkey" at the conclusion of the Chewbacca defense.

 

Now don't you go deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

It doesn't have anything to do with anything. It's the equivalent of Johnny Cochran telling the jury "look at the little monkey" at the conclusion of the Chewbacca defense.


Why does Tib keep bringing Acosta’s name up?

 

I don’t get his argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, njbuff said:


Why does Tib keep bringing Acosta’s name up?

 

I don’t get his argument.

 

He doesn't have one. That's the point.

 

It's like if you caught your girlfriend lying about being at her mom's house when she was really out wh0ring around with her friends, and rather than admit she was wrong and apologize she says "what about that time last year when you got drunk at your friend's house and didn't come home until 3 a.m."

 

 

**The language filter around here has gotten a little extreme.

Edited by Rob's House
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Washington Post's write-up of Yovanovitch's testimony is pretty awesome.  They now want Trump impeached for witness intimidation (for saying she was a bad ambassador, and that he has an unfettered right to appoint ambassadors), and for some ridiculous charge of, as near as I can understand it, violating the State Department's foreign policy.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

The Washington Post's write-up of Yovanovitch's testimony is pretty awesome.  They now want Trump impeached for witness intimidation (for saying she was a bad ambassador, and that he has an unfettered right to appoint ambassadors), and for some ridiculous charge of, as near as I can understand it, violating the State Department's foreign policy.  :lol:

She wasn't a witness and the hearing was not a legal procedure. They got nuthin'.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

The Washington Post's write-up of Yovanovitch's testimony is pretty awesome.  They now want Trump impeached for witness intimidation (for saying she was a bad ambassador, and that he has an unfettered right to appoint ambassadors), and for some ridiculous charge of, as near as I can understand it, violating the State Department's foreign policy.  :lol:

He tweeted while she was testifying so she wouldn't have been intimidated unless Schiffhead read it to her.  That makes him an accessory.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Marketing is top notch so far. 

 

Like they anticipated it.

(or, more likely, they're just better at it)

******************

:lol: 

 

 

Jesus, that Schaffer’s blowing the whistle one is hysterical. Trump should get a free pass for ONE IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE  just for sending that out!! 
 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...