Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

This thing is a huge flop. The biggest story is that there is no story. Outside of political pundits, no one's talking about this. 

The show started with a bang, but after Nunes riveting opening statement it turned into a soap opera, dull, predictable, and at times poorly written.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DC Tom said:

Done with jury duty.  Got out of it by telling the court I was racist.  

 

 

On it's face, this seems rather simplistic for you. Is it fair to assume that there is more to the story, such as you told the court that you identified as a black lesbian woman who was racist against whites?

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, row_33 said:


Nothing can stop this unless enough House Dems develop a soul or heart or brain and end it

 

 

Was at the library today and four derelicts were watching the hearings on free WiFi, grinning and yelling how Trump was going down 

 

I was going to ask if Tibs was one of them


The only place Trump is going down???????

 

Never mind.

 

?????

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

This whole show is so obviously a CIA flex that it’s not even funny.

 

This isn’t Democrats running an inquiry.  It’s the CIA running deeply compromised assets in Congress; telling the President that they run things.

This "low rent Ukrainian sequel" is most definitely the CIA Vs. POTUS.

The DOS and CIA are kissing cousins. EVERY US Embassy has CIA officers and operatives and they work in concert with the station's diplomatic team. 

This charade is Brennan's last (best?) hope to take down Trump and it's doomed to failure.

Brennan should get a present IMO... nine grams of lead.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

State department does not want to be part of Trump’s lies. Interesting, they won’t back up Trump. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/news-to-us-doj-distances-itself-from-mulvaney-claim-that-ukraine-aid-was-tied-to-investigation

If you are going to comment on your links maybe you should read the material first.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fire all the bullets - check

Throw the empty pistol - check

Throw the ejected cartridge casings - check

Wad up the cartridge carton and throw THAT - check

Pick up fistfuls of grass and throw THAT - check

Kick sand and dirt - check

Scream at the sky demons - check

Run away wildly flailing hands and arms while hollering “RUSSIA’” - check

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Fire all the bullets - check

Throw the empty pistol - check

Throw the ejected cartridge casings - check

Wad up the cartridge carton and throw THAT - check

Pick up fistfuls of grass and throw THAT - check

Kick sand and dirt - check

Scream at the sky demons - check

Run away wildly flailing hands and arms while hollering “RUSSIA’” - check

 


they could pray to their god Hillary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:


they could pray to their god Hillary 

Oh that’s what they do during their seven days of silent cleansing. They first have to soak their crystals in sea salt, run Melli’s through a forest, burn patchouli incense, smoke a nickel bag. Then they prostrate themselves on a prayer rug at the altar in their local Church of the Unholy Climate Change, and recite in silence 69 “Our Hillary” cantos. 

 

It it explains what we’ve described as “drive by” drop-ins from some of the lefties here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schiff Lies Yet Again, Claims 
To Not Know Who The Whistleblower Is

by Erielle Davidson

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

 

CNN analyst: It's a 'problem' for Dems
that impeachment witnesses never met Trump

by Joseph A. Wulfsohn

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

Heat but no light: First public 
impeachment hearing a dud

by Thomas Jipping

 

Original Article

 

 

.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Oh that’s what they do during their seven days of silent cleansing. They first have to soak their crystals in sea salt, run Melli’s through a forest, burn patchouli incense, smoke a nickel bag. Then they prostrate themselves on a prayer rug at the altar in their local Church of the Unholy Climate Change, and recite in silence 69 “Our Hillary” cantos. 

 

It it explains what we’ve described as “drive by” drop-ins from some of the lefties here. 

Have you been tailing Bob in Michigan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Oh that’s what they do during their seven days of silent cleansing. They first have to soak their crystals in sea salt, run Melli’s through a forest, burn patchouli incense, smoke a nickel bag. Then they prostrate themselves on a prayer rug at the altar in their local Church of the Unholy Climate Change, and recite in silence 69 “Our Hillary” cantos. 

 

It it explains what we’ve described as “drive by” drop-ins from some of the lefties here. 

 

i see astrology is picking up again amongst lefties and other assorted kooks in the candy box

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amb. Taylor mentioned that President Trump was not at all interested in the Ukraine and was more focused on Joe Biden’s investigation.

 

This was based on what his staffer reportedly heard from Ambassador Sondland — a man who has already given conflicting testimony — when he was asked what he felt was the President’s focus.

 

So this is what the press is shouting is the big ”bombshell”; A third-hand account of an opinion about someone’s possible motivation, from an individual who has already changed his official story.

 

That may qualify as a bombshell for the desperate, but it was not one that detonated.

 
 
 

 

Bureaucrats Gone Wild on ImpeachmentTV

by Liz Sheld

 

Original Article

 

I watched the entire affair yesterday. Here’s what you need to know if you missed Season 2, episode 1 of the Impeachment Follies:

 

1. The optics were awful. There were two old, dusty bureaucrats speaking gobbledygook, diplo-gibberish reporting what the derp state gossip was around the water cooler. They offered no first hand knowledge, neither of these men had ever met or spoken to the president.

 

2. This hot mess is not easy to understand unless you’ve been following it from the beginning. If a regular normie wanted to tune in to see what the president did to merit an impeachment inquiry, they were out of luck.

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rob's House said:

 

Oh Sh!t!!!  ?

???

 

I haven't seen a slip like that since Doug Whaley gave away the secret to winning.

 

I wonder how the 3 stooges will try to spin this one.

  Too bad about AOC's impending accident involving walking into the path of an oncoming car.  Whoops, was not suppose to let that out for another week...............................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...