GunnerBill Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: So how is McKittrick related to Jack Nicklaus? ? I don't know but he doesn't wear gloves. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boca BIlls Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 Neither WR is worth a damn tbh. Not one of them determines if the Bills win or lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Quint Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 We had alot of fun with Chas Rhinegold a few years back, too. (Cant remember his real name) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JESSEFEFFER Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 Based on what it would mean to the offense to establish viable deep threats to the passing game I'll go with Foster. I would not cite ball tracking on a blustery day or while looking into the sun as concerns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 1 hour ago, GunnerBill said: No. Dates back to when we signed him someone started a thread saying we had signed McKittrick and it has just stuck. I remember this. Cant remember who it was though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 Try sitting Duke. Play Foster and mckittrick 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r00tabaga Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 6 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said: McKittrick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster. All McKittrick does is make plays. Foster didn't do ***** last week with his chance. McD is supposed to be about playing those who produce, so no way McKittrick sits again. I don't normally agree with you, but this is spot on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Try sitting Duke. Play Foster and mckittrick This is what I would do. I got the decision to activate Duke and make him a big part of the gameplan against Tennessee. I said it on here the morning of the game - their corners are really good sticky guys who are hard to separate from but who have a vulnerability against size and strength. Since then I know he had the nice catch against Miami but Duke's struggles separating have shown up on tape. Particularly last week when if I said he had clear separation from the corner twice all game that would be a stretch. The Redskins are going to play a lot of zone on the back end, I think let's get our speed guys on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 I can’t remember the last time Foster ran a route other than a fly. It’s weird. If they activate him, I’d like to see him used more over the middle and on crosses like McK, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillies Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 1 hour ago, fansince88 said: I remember this. Cant remember who it was though. I think it was Gilbert and the other guy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCBillsBeliever Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 8 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said: McKittrick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster. All McKittrick does is make plays. Foster didn't do ***** last week with his chance. McD is supposed to be about playing those who produce, so no way McKittrick sits again. I always wonder whether the real McKenzie ever reads these posts, and what he thinks about the whole Mckittrick charade ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Junction Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 1 hour ago, JR in Pittsburgh said: I can’t remember the last time Foster ran a route other than a fly. It’s weird. If they activate him, I’d like to see him used more over the middle and on crosses like McK, at least. IIRC, he was pretty good at deep outs last year and due to his speed a lot of comeback routes were open as well. I really thought he had enough to build on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 9 minutes ago, Buffalo Junction said: IIRC, he was pretty good at deep outs last year and due to his speed a lot of comeback routes were open as well. I really thought he had enough to build on. yeah— it’s weird. I don’t recall him running any of those comebacks this year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Junction Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, JR in Pittsburgh said: yeah— it’s weird. I don’t recall him running any of those comebacks this year. Maybe it’s related to a lingering groin injury. Not sure. We’ll see how it plays out over the rest of the season. If he doesn’t “turn on” down the stretch he’ll be on the roster bubble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Otreply Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 8 hours ago, MJS said: Can someone explain why and how it started to call a player by the wrong name? No, if you gotta ask... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmur66 Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 I’d like to see some long 50/50 balls to Williams when single covered 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
die hard bills fan Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 1 minute ago, bmur66 said: I’d like to see some long 50/50 balls to Williams when single covered yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpsredemption Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 Not sure why it has to be One or the other. McKenzie adds value weekly so they are trying to get too cute by deactivating these guys. Horrible decision last wk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 I think both will be active this week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympus Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 Personally, I think that McKenzie is much more valuable to our offense. Like I assume most other bills fans do, I had much higher expectations for Foster after seeing his climb in our offense last year. But if you go back to preseason, McKenzie has made some really impressive catches both over the top and contested, and I think he's a bigger threat/better catcher down the field than most give him credit for. With that in my mind, its hard to imagine the value of Foster when he's not tracking the football. Now I'll admit, Fosters lack of production could be in large part because of Josh's lack of ability to throw the deep ball thus far this year, but regardless of the reason, if Foster isn't getting the deep ball receptions that he thrives on, what is he providing us that McKenzie is not? I just feel like Isiah gives us more options when he's on the field, which should be the goal of every offensive player imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts