Jump to content

Did Jonathan Jones purposely take out Josh Allen?


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, BillsInWilmingtonNC said:

Mike Golic just said the flag should’ve been picked up or thrown on Josh Allen for lowering his head and that the patriot player tried to hit with his shoulder pads.... I have no clue where he gets any of that from watching the clip

I’m sorry, but what a douche. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BillsInWilmingtonNC said:

Mike Golic just said the flag should’ve been picked up or thrown on Josh Allen for lowering his head and that the patriot player tried to hit with his shoulder pads.... I have no clue where he gets any of that from watching the clip

Of course Allen lowered his head - he did it not to initiate contact but in attempt to dive to get the first down.  WTF is Golic looking at?

Edited by Azucho98
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PatsFanNH said:

I’m not talking PLAYER intent as I am not in his head.. but TEAM intent.. the amount of pressure they had on Allen if the team “wanted” it they could have set it up any time while in the pocket..

 

I can't see BB telling his players to do that, but there are some dirty mutha :censored: on that defense and team in general. Van Noy is another along with Chung and Bennett. Who knows what they talk about amongst each other? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Captain Murica said:

Yes. 

 

I usually don’t assume intent but this was blatant. There was no need for Jones to even being involved. Allen was already going down and being engaged by another tackler. 

 

 

THIS is the most correct interpretation. That Cheatriots thug saw an opportunity and he TOOK it!

 

100%.

 

If the NFL gives two shites about head hitting, off goes this gangsta for a few!

 

Also- if it really cares, a head hitter penalty can never be off set by any lesser violation- like Holding. Either the yardage needs to be increased or the hit penalty is assessed and the down remains the same.

 

Looks completely foolish on the NFL’s part!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mattynh said:

 

They did add a penalty a couple years ago about runners lowing their head, not sure it has eve been called.  I really think you have to consider the down and distance and the fact Allen was approaching the sticks on 3rd and 8.  He was going for the first down, the defender was trying to prevent it.   The play was illegal on the defenders side for sure but I have seen much worse.

I know the penalty goes both ways for dropping your head, but it seems like a stretch to say Allen lowers his head, any slight drop in his head is 100% due to the fact he is trying to hold onto the ball in preparation for the big hit he is about to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Azucho98 said:

Of course Allen lowered his head - he did it not to initiate contact but in attempt to dive to get the first down.  WTF is Golic looking at?

That is definitely what Josh was trying to do. Having said this, the DB did his job in keeping Josh from getting the extra yardage. Golic is wrong, it should have been and was a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, bmur66 said:

Maybe it was intentional. Maybe it wasn't. How do you judge someone's intent? Fact is it was a helmet to helmet hit and apparently the NFL didn't think it rose to the "ejection level" whatever that means. 

 

Bottom line is Allen should have slid and avoided the hit. Yes it was 3rd down and he was trying get the first. That decision cost him an injury and any chance at a comeback.

 

Did anyone notice what the offsetting penalty was? I did not see it at the game or watching the replay? 

Similar hit Thursday night...Barnett on Williams...taken off on stretcher and he wasn't ejected. I don't think the league knows what they are doing....Hyde was right though....if one of our guys hit Brady like that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mannc said:

There are a lot of people in this republic who are immune to things like facts and evidence. Golic apparently is one of them.

 

He threw it in right after a rant about how Vontaz Burfict should be suspended for his hit because the league is getting those hits out of the game, and then said the crap about Josh Allen's hit and that McDermott needs to watch the tape of the hit because it was Josh that led with his helmet.  What a load of garbage!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Billsatlastin2018 said:

 

Maybe. But, he purposely hit him helmet to helmet! And many of those- off you go! 

Yep, maybe he should go, but the question was" Did Jonathan Jones purposely take out Josh Allen?"

Josh was trying to get extra yardage and a first down. The DB kept him from doing so. That was his intent. IMO. 

 

Edited by Dopey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nucci said:

Similar hit Thursday night...Barnett on Williams...taken off on stretcher and he wasn't ejected. I don't think the league knows what they are doing....Hyde was right though....if one of our guys hit Brady like that.....

No doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nucci said:

Similar hit Thursday night...Barnett on Williams...taken off on stretcher and he wasn't ejected. I don't think the league knows what they are doing....Hyde was right though....if one of our guys hit Brady like that.....

Brady rarely runs and when he does he slides before he gets hit.. if that had been done in the pocket the player would have been ejected.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PatsFanNH said:

No, I meant the Patriots purposely went out there to hurt him (or intent) it just happened was no intent by the team for it.. how would they know he would scramble and refuse go down?

 

im blaming Allen for being to much like Newton! Cam did the same dang thing and UNLIKE Allen he rarely even got the flag thrown for the helmet to helmet on him.  Maybe I’m crazy but as a fan I wouldn’t think you would want your FQB taken a beating like that for a yard... you were in FG range and plenty of time left.. 

Well you're crazy in the sense that you're disregarding the cause of the injury and placing it on the shoulders of the guy who was hit.

 

Is there a football fan or players left that doesn't know about the helmet to helmet rule?  The entire game is played out without a similar occurrence, yet occurs when the opportunity presents itself. 

 

The Pat's are widely and correctly acknowledged for incredible attention to detail when preparing for games. They know the tendencies of the players and are coached accordingly.  "Do your job" is the mantra.  No need to rehash the past here, but the ship sailed a long time ago on giving the Pats the benefit of the doubt.  Imo they are coached up to and including this sort of thing.  When Gronkowski assaulted Tre White, where was the team punishment? Heck, going back to  Wilfork blowing out Losman's knee with an elbow? And so on. 

 

As a fan I'd like to see JA slide. However, the context of the game matters.  You're down 6 due in large part to your performance, you're certainly not getting help from the officials (flags thrown and picked up om def holding when approaching the red zone,  illegal formations/attack on special teams, review on int being questioned by a former official, and eventually grounding not being grounding when its grounding), you're 23 and you put it all on your back. Bad choice to be sure, but the byproduct of NOT sliding is not assumed to be a clear helmet to helmet hit.  Similarly, under pressure, one would not assume that scrambling to avoid a sack would result in a helmet to helmet hit, a dive at the knees or a head slap. 

 

You're correct that it is naive to think a defensive player on the other side won't target the head.  I don't think the same sort of scenario would have played out had he not scrambled. I'm 50/50 on whether he would have taken the shot to the head if he slid. I'd like to think no, but then again the rule on helmet to helmet is pretty well established and yet it happened in a big way.

 

I'd consider this a crime of opportunity. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, nucci said:

Similar hit Thursday night...Barnett on Williams...taken off on stretcher and he wasn't ejected. I don't think the league knows what they are doing....Hyde was right though....if one of our guys hit Brady like that.....

I think they know, I think they protect the brand above all else, and the brand wants nothing to do with widespread condemnation of players out causing concussions in the era of CTE. 

 

Brady is the one of the marquis faces of the brand, thus injury to him is a very bad thing for the league.  Fans love him, or hate him, but he draws the crowd. When all is said and done, a JA, Cam Newton or Barnett is disposable, Brady or Brees absolutely not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

As a mod, I ought to object (and would if towards another poster)

 

Given the context of what Golic said - “you’re too kind”

Much appreciated. I’m not normally one for the language, but I’m at a loss for words. Pats never do anything wrong. Never mind that Jones stood over Josh and flexed after the hit. Replay showed that, but I guess intent wasn’t there to throw him out of the game. 

Edited by TheProcess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...