B-Man Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 The question now should be what will be the next manufactured hysteria inducing impeach Trump story? Whistleblower was clearly a failed effort to get ahead of the upcoming declass and IG FISA report. What's next? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 I call for any impeachment votes to be made by the full HOR before the end of 2019. Everyone needs to go on record. This horseshit to keep the partisan fires alive in the committees that can only grandstand in order to fool the uninformed, is malicious and against what we stand for as a country. C'mon Nancy, push this impeachment through as if it is a faux healthcare bill. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 53 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Let me start out by saying I have no actual proof of the following: It is looking more and more like an entity (Rose Law Firm?) looked for a possible way to get to new impeachment charges against Trump. I wonder if they held a casting call (such as they did with AOC) to find an appropriate whistleblower. Well we know you have no proof because that’s an idiotic thing you just said. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Well we know you have no proof because that’s an idiotic thing you just said. Agreed. That's as well-supported as the Kavanaugh accusations. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Well we know you have no proof because that’s an idiotic thing you just said. There's a movie about it though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 3 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Well we know you have no proof because that’s an idiotic thing you just said. It has been said that the whistleblower complaint appears to have been put together by a quality attorney on the level of a first chair. You may not have recognized the supreme work as just that though. BTW, the whistleblowers attorney is Andrew P. Bakaj of the Rose Law Firm. Here's a little info on Rose: https://compassrosepllc.com/bakaj/ 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: It has been said that the whistleblower complaint appears to have been put together by a quality attorney on the level of a first chair. You may not have recognized the supreme work as just that though. BTW, the whistleblowers attorney is Andrew P. Bakaj of the Rose Law Firm. Here's a little info on Rose: https://compassrosepllc.com/bakaj/ Well, you got me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Agreed. That's as well-supported as the Kavanaugh accusations. I freely stated that I had no proof but did have a hunch. I even said to take it with a grain of salt. I would agree with you that it is Kavanaugh level support. Never said anything else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: I freely stated that I had no proof but did have a hunch. I even said to take it with a grain of salt. I would agree with you that it is Kavanaugh level support. Never said anything else. Yes, and it’s still wildly dumb. Saying something has no evidence does not shield it from being dumb. anyways, moving on from that conspiracy theory.... how long does everyone think this whistleblower issue is going to dominate the news? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2019 Author Share Posted September 27, 2019 The evidence is only visible to the reality based community. The evidence is clear, Trump attempted to undermine our Republic, to corrupt our democracy and undermine the rule of law. He is a threat to national security. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 From that right-wing rag......................the Washington Post. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2019 Author Share Posted September 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: From that right-wing rag......................the Washington Post. You are right, this clear Trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 1 hour ago, jrober38 said: I think 2020 will hinge heavily on Health Care. You might not like the Democrat plans, but the Republicans have no plan. 6 years to come up with an alternative to the ACA and 2.5 years with Trump in power and they still have no plan on how to make anything better. It will hinge on an issue that the federal government has no power to control? Where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the power to run healthcare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2019 Author Share Posted September 27, 2019 Just now, dubs said: It will hinge on an issue that the federal government has no power to control? Where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the power to run healthcare. Implied powers. You want to take away Medicare from all the seniors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: It has been said that the whistleblower complaint appears to have been put together by a quality attorney on the level of a first chair. You may not have recognized the supreme work as just that though. BTW, the whistleblowers attorney is Andrew P. Bakaj of the Rose Law Firm. Here's a little info on Rose: https://compassrosepllc.com/bakaj/ It's entirely possible the whistleblower went to Rose to put the complaint together - were I in a similar situation, I'd consider legal representation. It's not unreasonable. But there's a large jump from that to "manufactured by a third party from multiple party's testimonies." It's also possible - and I wouldn't put it past Bakaj, who's rather something of an #######. But there's no facts supporting it, either. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: It's entirely possible the whistleblower went to Rose to put the complaint together - were I in a similar situation, I'd consider legal representation. It's not unreasonable. But there's a large jump from that to "manufactured by a third party from multiple party's testimonies." It's also possible - and I wouldn't put it past Bakaj, who's rather something of an #######. But there's no facts supporting it, either. I don't disagree with you at all. This started out a couple posts or more back in what I called a hunch. The Rose Law Firm certainly has some connections to the liberal cause and even some somewhat well known politicians who have a bone to pick with Trump. My hunch, which isn't yet worth the paper it is written on is still more valid than some of the Left's claims and the abhorrent opening statement by Adam Schiff. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 3 hours ago, Kemp said: Not surprised that you don't know what the ship refers to. I do. You still don't. None of this has ever been about Trump for me. That's why you're so lost, you keep assuming you're informed while proving you're not. Do better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts