DC Tom Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 And Ye Jianming and...wait for it...Rosneft. You're going to need a Lexis-Nexis account for this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 6 hours ago, John Adams said: Or he's nuts. Take your pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 LOL 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 12 hours ago, John Adams said: Or he's nuts. Take your pick. says the delusional with 3 admitted sock puppets. you just can't make this crap up.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 8 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL Lawyer for Ukraine whistleblower says he represents second whistleblower on Trump's actions Attorney Mark Zaid confirmed to CNN that he and other lawyers on his team are now representing the second person, who has first-hand knowledge that supports claims made by the first whistleblower. Zaid told CNN that the second whistleblower works in the intelligence community and has spoken to the intelligence community's inspector general, but has not filed their own complaint and doesn't need to as anyone who speaks to inspector watchdog is considered to have made a protected disclosure and is a whistleblower under law. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/06/politics/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 Good Lord!!! Do they have a line of people to accuse if the previous accuser is found to be FOS? This looks really bad for the democrates. They seem so desperate. I wonder why? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 29 minutes ago, ALF said: Lawyer for Ukraine whistleblower says he represents second whistleblower on Trump's actions Attorney Mark Zaid confirmed to CNN that he and other lawyers on his team are now representing the second person, who has first-hand knowledge that supports claims made by the first whistleblower. Zaid told CNN that the second whistleblower works in the intelligence community and has spoken to the intelligence community's inspector general, but has not filed their own complaint and doesn't need to as anyone who speaks to inspector watchdog is considered to have made a protected disclosure and is a whistleblower under law. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/06/politics/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine/index.html Not going to matter / CYA move. Again, this is all really about this: Rudy isn't slowing down, if anything he's cranked it up... (because he's got them dead to rights and they know it) Jordan making the Sunday show rounds: 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not going to matter / CYA move. Again, this is all really about this: Possibly the biggest scandal in U.S. history doesn't deserve the oversight of the Attorney General? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Possibly the biggest scandal in U.S. history doesn't deserve the oversight of the Attorney General? It's amazing, isn't it? They give themselves away. They are SCARED. They have activated the entire media apparatus to provide cover -- but that won't work as well in the past coming on the heels of a three year disinformation campaign run by the very same media on Trump/Russia. People are awake. They're watching. And no one takes the media seriously on this subject. Nor should they. They've proved they're dishonest actors. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 DR......do you really think cutting and pasting a bunch links and memes containing no actual substance from people nobody knows or dumb ass monikers is actual ....stuff? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 It's not anything of importance to you, TH3. You turned off your critical thinking capabilities long ago. To others, it's up to them to decide. The people posted and quoted have been on the front lines of this scandal for three years with an accurate track record to back up their work. People are free to take it as they wish. Truth: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's amazing, isn't it? They give themselves away. They are SCARED. They have activated the entire media apparatus to provide cover -- but that won't work as well in the past coming on the heels of a three year disinformation campaign run by the very same media on Trump/Russia. People are awake. They're watching. And no one takes the media seriously on this subject. Nor should they. They've proved they're dishonest actors. It's notable that they're not even calling for Barr's recusal, but going straight to impeachment and imprisonment. They're trying to get rid of everyone. They're going to try to tie Kavanaugh to the Ukraine soon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 This is brutal 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: It's notable that they're not even calling for Barr's recusal, but going straight to impeachment and imprisonment. They're trying to get rid of everyone. They're going to try to tie Kavanaugh to the Ukraine soon. Correct. It's blatant and transparent what the plan is. For three years we heard the same people, once the Russian hoax fell apart, claim the investigation was justified because Trump might have been working with Russia. Funny how that standard has changed when the power of the state is aimed at them. It's going to be fun watching them burn. ********** 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 (remember, Zaid reps ECW as well...) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: (remember, Zaid reps ECW as well...) Well, the first whistleblower committed perjury. They needed someone who may have legitimately passed their background check. Or if not that, at least not be on the no-fly list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Well, the first whistleblower committed perjury. They needed someone who may have legitimately passed their background check. Or if not that, at least not be on the no-fly list. I'm also thinking it could be one of WB#1's sources. Filing for WB protection is better than being hung out to dry for a felony leak charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm also thinking it could be one of WB#1's sources. Filing for WB protection is better than being hung out to dry for a felony leak charge. Already been reported that this new whistleblower was already interviewed by the OSC in the investigation into the first whistleblower's report. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: Already been reported that this new whistleblower was already interviewed by the OSC in the investigation into the first whistleblower's report. yeah, i don't think that will stop the Donners from trotting him/her out as even more evidence against Trump. they remind me of... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 6, 2019 Share Posted October 6, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm also thinking it could be one of WB#1's sources. Filing for WB protection is better than being hung out to dry for a felony leak charge. My understanding is that the 2nd WB is Christine Blasey Ford's husband. Other possible whistleblowers include Cenk Uygur and Ilhan Omar's 5th husband/brother. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts