Kelly the Dog Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 I didnt hear the announcers discuss this, and not that they are always right about these things, but to me it was very clear, both live and on replay that Gore's forward progress was 1-2 feet across the goal line. It wasn't even all that close as far as those things go. My only possibility is if on the replay the Refs could easily infer that Gore was well out of the endzone but didn't see the ball on that particular view. One view, IMO, showed he was clearly over. What was the explanation and what do you guys say? I wasn't even worried until the Bills were kicking off. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 There wasn’t a good camera angle. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 It wasn’t. Not enough cough cough evidence to overturn 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 It’s where the ball was. And I agree the ball got over the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 Just now, Virgil said: There wasn’t a good camera angle. I saw it clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r00tabaga Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 That was BS... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 The ref who called it had the best view. The one thing that was said that made me think it was correct, the entire ball has to get out of the endzone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 9, 2019 Author Share Posted September 9, 2019 Just now, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. He couldn't. They have to review it in the booth because it was a scoring play. 7 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not at the table Karlos Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 Just now, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. It would have been a penalty if he challenged it. All scoring plays are reviewed automatically 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 Close call. The entire ball must be beyond the line. It was a bad call to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gray Beard Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 The entire ball has to get over the line. From the replay, it wasn’t clear. Too many bodies blocking the view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 1 minute ago, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. Can't challenge a scoring play. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 1 minute ago, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. McD needn't challenge. As a scoring play it was reviewed. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 Actually the announcers did question it and thought his forward progress was beyond the goal line. But they also thought not enough evidence to overturn either. Kind of surprising to me as usually they give the benefit of the doubt on those types of plays and rule on even the slightest forward progress. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 Just now, Kelly the Dog said: He couldn't. They have to review it in the booth because it was a scoring play. Ah, yes. Thanks for the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 1 minute ago, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. Arent all scoring plays reviewed so he can’t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. I believe it was an automatic review.... not enough evidence to overturn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLTbills Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, yall said: I can understand the refs misreading it in real time. I can't understand McD not challenging it. Well isn’t a safety technically a “scoring play,” and thus, shouldn’t it be automatically reviewed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 9, 2019 Author Share Posted September 9, 2019 He was clearly well past the line with the ball before being pushed back. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts