Jump to content

4 Buffalo Bills on initial 53-man roster at risk of being replaced by Week 1


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Coleman. That is the plan apparently. 

It's a slick move to keep Croom as insurance in a shaky TE room (two rookies, an injury prone Kroft, and a blocking TE) as Coleman doesn't have to clear waivers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, from_dunkirk said:

 

 

He is in the article, at the end. The OP couldn't post the entire article here due to the TOS. I was confused too at first, when I read there were four players in the title, but I only saw three in the posting.

 

The OP posted more of the article than he should have under "Fair use" copyright.  I musta been worn down yesterday and let it slide.

 

I read the article initially - either it all didn't load, or they edited it to add Borjorques.  Either way, I completely concur with their conclusion.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

Especially Anger, that's a millionx better... I feel like Colquitt is related to the other Colquitt punter that was great for years, probably second best option followed by Allen.

Iassume the "other Colquit" to whom you're referring is Dustin.  Yes, they are brothers.  There is actually a whole family of Colquit punters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one part I don't understand is why not just keep Coleman and cut Dean?  There are rumors the Bills plan to sign Mutterlan after game 1 to avoid paying the full year salary I get that concept, but in this case if they are signing Coleman back on Monday nothing gained there so why not just keep him?  Are they that much afraid that another team will sign Marlowe but by Monday the interest will have died down?  If that were the case with the rumors already out there I'd just hold one extra slot on my PS open until the Bills do release him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

The OP posted more of the article than he should have under "Fair use" copyright.  I musta been worn down yesterday and let it slide.

 

I read the article initially - either it all didn't load, or they edited it to add Borjorques.  Either way, I completely concur with their conclusion.

 

Yeah, that's why when I first read the post, I thought it was the full article. And yeah, the article is good. We do need a punter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Bojo should be gone. Apparently we will have to draft one next year.

 

 

Drafting a punter or kicker in the 6th or 7th round when you have a need for one is a no-brainer to me, and yet a lot of teams go to UDFA to find one.  Teams usually take a flyer on some skill player that has next to no chance of making the club but then have terrible specialists that cost them things like missed PATs, poor field position, etc.  There are usually several good options in the later rounds.

 

As much as I don't care for Belichick he is right about the importance of a team's kicker.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/1/2019 at 3:31 PM, sullim4 said:

 

Drafting a punter or kicker in the 6th or 7th round when you have a need for one is a no-brainer to me, and yet a lot of teams go to UDFA to find one.  Teams usually take a flyer on some skill player that has next to no chance of making the club but then have terrible specialists that cost them things like missed PATs, poor field position, etc.  There are usually several good options in the later rounds.

 

As much as I don't care for Belichick he is right about the importance of a team's kicker.

 

Yep .

 

Saw a 6'7" rugby guy on Houston that made some boomers, could be someone to watch.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...