GG Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Just now, ShadyBillsFan said: Ahhh but which truth? Not enough to "convict" is like saying Epstein is a saint. Where in Mueller's report does it say that there wasn't enough information to "convict" Trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Just now, GG said: Where in Mueller's report does it say that there wasn't enough information to "convict" Trump? Under those BLACKED OUT LINES Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict Trump https://www.nbcnews.com/...trump/did-mueller-mean-trump-could-be-indicted-when-... Jul 24, 2019 - The special counsel's report said he never came to a determination about ... to Mueller saying that but for the OLC memo, Trump would have been indicted. ... "Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with ... and concise moment to say the only reason Trump wasn't indicted is ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Just now, ShadyBillsFan said: Under those BLACKED OUT LINES When does a US prosecutor ever have the power to convict or even opine on a conviction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 "Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction of justice?" Buck asked. "We did not make that calculation," Mueller said, citing the OLC opinion. Buck later asked, "Could you charge a president with a crime after he left office?" "Yes," Mueller replied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Ahhh but which truth? Not enough to "convict" That is like saying Epstein really wasn't Dons friend Epstein and Trump ran in the same NYC circles. Trump took a flight on a plane with Epstein and his brother, and no one else from Florida to NYC once. Trump found out Epstein was hitting on under-age girls at Mar a lago and had him banned. Trump also went to the police with Intel about Epstein when no one else high profile would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said: "Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction of justice?" Buck asked. "We did not make that calculation," Mueller said, citing the OLC opinion. Buck later asked, "Could you charge a president with a crime after he left office?" "Yes," Mueller replied. In this forum, words matter. Where in the blacked out lines does Mueller opine on Trump's conviction? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Epstein and Trump ran in the same NYC circles. Trump took a flight on a plane with Epstein and his brother, and no one else from Florida to NYC once. Trump found out Epstein was hitting on under-age girls at Mar a lago and had him banned. Trump also went to the police with Intel about Epstein when no one else high profile would. Good for Don for banning him. Bad for Don for all his lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Under those BLACKED OUT LINES Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict Trump https://www.nbcnews.com/...trump/did-mueller-mean-trump-could-be-indicted-when-... Jul 24, 2019 - The special counsel's report said he never came to a determination about ... to Mueller saying that but for the OLC memo, Trump would have been indicted. ... "Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with ... and concise moment to say the only reason Trump wasn't indicted is ... I wouldn't use the Mueller testimony about the Weissman Report as a support for Trump doing anything illegal. Mueller hardly covered himself in glory if you watched the whole testimony. Note: there is nothing to prevent any President from being charged and convicted during his/her Presidency or afterward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Just now, GG said: In this forum, words matter. Where in the blacked out lines does Mueller opine on Trump's conviction? SARCASM doesn't work well here does it? Forget the BS collusion and focus in on the obstruction. All they had to say is they were clueless about how politicians should or should not interact with foreign heads of state considered "enemies" . Say than and Bob's your Uncle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Just now, ShadyBillsFan said: SARCASM doesn't work well here does it? Forget the BS collusion and focus in on the obstruction. All they had to say is they were clueless about how politicians should or should not interact with foreign heads of state considered "enemies" . Say than and Bob's your Uncle. So a wrong word usage is now sarcasm? Educate us on the obstruction charge. Who helped Trump with obstruction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 1 minute ago, GG said: So a wrong word usage is now sarcasm? Educate us on the obstruction charge. Who helped Trump with obstruction? Under those BLACKED OUT LINES was the sarcastic part Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Under those BLACKED OUT LINES was the sarcastic part How about addressing the main points? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Note: there is nothing to prevent any President from being charged and convicted during his/her Presidency or afterward. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president’s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 Jeffrey Epstein’s Death in Federal Custody the Suicide of Federal Government Credibility. Even if it’s pure incompetence, it’s Third World level incompetence. And that’s a best-case scenario. But remember, these people want to evaluate your mental health to decide if you can be trusted with a gun. As a friend says on Facebook: “We are supposed to believe the government can stop gun ‘violence’ before it happens on a nation-wide scale; yet they were unable to prevent . . . a man in a cell from killing himself who previously tried and failed.” . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 28 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I love Wikileaks! I am on vacation in Rockies and walked by a guy yesterday wearing a “I Love Wikileaks” t-shirt. I laughed, his response, “Go Bills!” (I was wearing a Bills hat) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, B-Man said: Jeffrey Epstein’s Death in Federal Custody the Suicide of Federal Government Credibility. Even if it’s pure incompetence, it’s Third World level incompetence. And that’s a best-case scenario. But remember, these people want to evaluate your mental health to decide if you can be trusted with a gun. As a friend says on Facebook: “We are supposed to believe the government can stop gun ‘violence’ before it happens on a nation-wide scale; yet they were unable to prevent . . . a man in a cell from killing himself who previously tried and failed.” . Classic, cut government funding and then blame government for the shortcomings Quote But Young said, even in Epstein’s case, correctional officers face a grim reality. “We can’t ever stop anyone who is persistent on killing themselves,” Young said. “The only thing the bureau can do is delay that.” Young said he and other officials had long been raising concerns as the Trump administration had imposed a hiring freeze and budget cuts on the Federal Bureau of Prisons. “All this was caused by the administration,” Young said. Spokesmen for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In congressional testimony earlier this year, Attorney General William P. Barr conceded the bureau was “short” about 4,000 or 5,000 employees and said he had lifted the hiring freeze and was trying to ensure a steady pipeline of new officers to replace those who leave. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/it-was-inevitable-officers-watching-epstein-were-on-overtime-due-to-jail-staffing-shortage-union-president-says/2019/08/11/2b611404-bc5e-11e9-a5c6-1e74f7ec4a93_story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: Jeffrey Epstein’s Death in Federal Custody the Suicide of Federal Government Credibility. Even if it’s pure incompetence, it’s Third World level incompetence. And that’s a best-case scenario. But remember, these people want to evaluate your mental health to decide if you can be trusted with a gun. As a friend says on Facebook: “We are supposed to believe the government can stop gun ‘violence’ before it happens on a nation-wide scale; yet they were unable to prevent . . . a man in a cell from killing himself who previously tried and failed.” . Sorry can’t use comments from Facebook, Twitter is the preferred news source here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 28 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Note: there is nothing to prevent any President from being charged and convicted during his/her Presidency or afterward. During? Yes. After? No. Impeachment by the House and removal after conviction by the Senate is the sole remedy for a sitting President who is engaging in wrongdoing. Once they're out of office, then they can be prosecuted. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed65.asp 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 17 hours ago, njbuff said: Can the MSM report the REAL news on this one? At least give these victims some sort of justice instead of CONSTANTLY painting only the “non left” as the only bad people on this planet. Can we get some actual journalism from the likes of CNN and MSNBC here? Is that asking too much? Yes, it is. The MSM is part of the veil that the elites have pulled over your eyes in order to protect themselves from you. They will not engage honestly because that is not their job. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Yes, it is. The MSM is part of the veil that the elites have pulled over your eyes in order to protect themselves from you. They will not engage honestly because that is not their job. It was a lot easier for them when they controlled all the TV news on 3 liberal networks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts