Jump to content

Meanwhile at Dolphins camp...


Recommended Posts

I sat in on a clinic with Flaherty a couple of years ago. Nice guy and all but really wasn't super impressed with his knowledge and process etc. But he has a super bowl ring and I'm on my couch. He's like Danny Crossman, one of these mediocre coaches who hangs around and keeps getting jobs. Best of luck to him, but Dolphins probably made the right move for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, billsgpr88 said:

 

I've been following this debate and felt compelled to chime in. IMO, Fitzpatrick is far more dangerous a qb to face, without question.

 

Citing statistics is a misleading way to assess a qb's value; sure, the big ones such as TDs and INTs matter, but completion percentage and yards are not necessarily indicative of a qb's ability to pull out a win. 

 

For years, Tannehill's bread and butter was dumping off the ball to Jarvis Landry and relying on his YAC. When it's third and long and a qb dumps off the ball off for a 5 yard gain, it helps his completion percentage and yards, but doesn't get the team any closer to winning the game ( remember Tyrod or post concussion Trent?). 

 

I haven't followed Tannehill much beyond Bills games, but I think we all know what we saw out there: a QB with no mobility, and no killer instinct to go for the big play when their team needs one. And without that a QB doesn't stand a chance of sustaining a winning record in the league. Fitz, for all of his flaws, does have that instinct to go for it; sometimes it works out, often it doesn't, but at least you gotta chance with him.

 

As a Bills fan, I will sincerely miss seeing Tannehill on the schedule twice a year 

 

Tannehill's teams win at a higher % than do Fitz's. As far as mobility, neither is what I'd call a mobile QB but Tannehill averages more yards per rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

Ya gotta kinda wonder if something else isn't going on. You spend all this time getting ready for training camp...and you dump your OL coach less than a week in?

 

I don’t think you can call them a “well run” organization at this point. Ross doesn’t seem like a complete a**hat to me, but he is entirely clueless. 

 

Considering they fired Gase, it makes me moist thinking about how the Jets are going to implode this year as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't read all the comments so I apologize if this has already been said, but it takes some stones to realize a mistake this early and correct it. It's much easier to fix a problem in late July than to realize the OL coach doesn't know his stuff in mid november. Regardless I am happy to see the dolphins struggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

 

Tannehill's teams win at a higher % than do Fitz's. As far as mobility, neither is what I'd call a mobile QB but Tannehill averages more yards per rush.

 

I never said Fitz is a better runner, I just described what I see in Tannehill. Again, you are using statistics in a misleading way, as Fitzpatrick has been on some terrible teams. Dak Prescott has a higher winning % than Aaron Rodgers, does that mean he is a better qb? The point I was trying to make is Tannehill cannot put on a team on his back; there may be some advanced metrics that quantify this, but conventional stats won't show it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billsgpr88 said:

 

I never said Fitz is a better runner, I just described what I see in Tannehill. Again, you are using statistics in a misleading way, as Fitzpatrick has been on some terrible teams. Dak Prescott has a higher winning % than Aaron Rodgers, does that mean he is a better qb? The point I was trying to make is Tannehill cannot put on a team on his back; there may be some advanced metrics that quantify this, but conventional stats won't show it. 

You were the one who talked about winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, billsgpr88 said:

 

 

I haven't followed Tannehill much beyond Bills games, but I think we all know what we saw out there: a QB with no mobility, and no killer instinct to go for the big play when their team needs one. And without that a QB doesn't stand a chance of sustaining a winning record in the league. Fitz, for all of his flaws, does have that instinct to go for it; sometimes it works out, often it doesn't, but at least you gotta chance with him.

 

I know I sound slightly deranged on the subject of Ryan Tannehill but I have watched him play around 40 times and my honest assessment is he doesn't play to "win the game" as Herm would say. He was a late convert to QB in college and my honest opinion is that he has never had confidence in his ability to play the position, he is deeply insecure and knows deep down that he sucks and as such he plays each game trying to hide his inability as well as possible. He has zero instinct to go for it because he has zero confidence in his ability to go for it. You have no chance with Ryan Tannehill. No chance. No hope. His numbers tell you he is in that Dalton type bracket but the film tells you different. 

 

Bruce Arians always says "no risk it, no biscuit" and Tannehill hasn't seen a single biscuit in the 7 years he started for Miami. You can't win with him. Because when you need someone to take a risk to make a play Ryan Tannehill won't do it. And people presume when I say that I mean he won't throw the deep ball.... but it is more than that. He won't try and fit that ball into that tight window (whether that is 6 yards past the line of scrimmage or 60 yards past the line of scrimmage) even when it is 4th down and the game is on the line. He plays the position scared. It is very Tyrod esque. I actually said to @Kirby Jackson when Tyrod was our Quarterback here that "he is probably a better Quarterback that Fitz but I feel like I know I can never win playing Tyrod's way. The odds on winning Fitz's way are small - because that killer INT is always around the corner - but there might be that day on the big stage where he makes that throw." Tannehill is never doing that. Because he is never taking that throw on. 

 

I don't care what numbers you put up. You cannot play Quarterback in this league playing scared. And that is how Tannehill plays and that is why his numbers are a mirage. You can't win with him. You can't even hope with him. With Fitzpatrick the hope might kill you..... with Tannehill it is the hope that is killed. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@GunnerBill it's been amusing reading your diatribe on Tannehill in this thread -- you are certainly passionate in your distaste for him as an NFL QB but I have to admit you're spot on.  It's amazing Miami stuck with him for so long.  Fitzy was always more entertaining and at least plays to win -- he just doesn't always have the ability to make it happen.

 

One wonders what direction the Bills franchise would have taken if Buddy Nix was never catfished and they kept Fitz around even after drafting EJ.  It doesn't matter now because I'm really happy with where they're headed, but it's an interesting "what if" to think about.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eball said:

@GunnerBill it's been amusing reading your diatribe on Tannehill in this thread -- you are certainly passionate in your distaste for him as an NFL QB but I have to admit you're spot on.  It's amazing Miami stuck with him for so long.  Fitzy was always more entertaining and at least plays to win -- he just doesn't always have the ability to make it happen.

 

One wonders what direction the Bills franchise would have taken if Buddy Nix was never catfished and they kept Fitz around even after drafting EJ.  It doesn't matter now because I'm really happy with where they're headed, but it's an interesting "what if" to think about.

I actually agree with you here.  Not to go back to the Gailey days but I think the biggest mistake they made was not drafting a qb when we had Fitz.  Every young qb would benefit from having Fitz to learn from.  I think the problem is Fitz is too good of a guy to be a backup and often ends up playing better than the young guy and teams don’t want that headache.  He was better than Winston last year.  

 

But ultimately, his physical limitations hold him back in the long run.  Still better than Tannehill. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

 

I should have said it's not a meaningful debate. Tannehill is statistically superior in every category. 

Bah!  Fitz pressers rock!  ?

7 hours ago, Jeetz1231 said:

It's much easier to fix a problem in late July than to realize the OL coach doesn't know his stuff in mid november. 

“What?!  We get to field 11 players?!”  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread, including the title, is making my morning.   So much funny stuff in here.  

15 hours ago, scribo said:

Don't forget the Skins.

 

I have them as the worst team in the league.  Dolphins may be close behind.  They are in quasi-rebuild mode.  Seems like they could be stuck there for a while.  Really depends on if the Dolphins D can sustain another year of carrying the team, because the offense looks offensive.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...