Deranged Rhino Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Tibs, your thread title is wrong... As is this whole process. I would think people would be less eager to trust proven liars and manipulators than we're seeing, but dummies gonna dumb. "The only bi-partisan vote on that floor, was against (impeachment)." McCarthy just now. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Tibs, your thread title is wrong... As is this whole process. I would think people would be less eager to trust proven liars and manipulators than we're seeing, but dummies gonna dumb. "The only bi-partisan vote on that floor, was against (impeachment)." McCarthy just now. Meh, it was a procedure vote. These guys should shut it at this time. This wasn't a vote to open an inquiry, that option doesn't exist. The inquiry is happening. This wasn't a vote to issue articles of impeachment. They should save these statement for later. It also doesn't look so great that Congress, the two major political parties, and the country are so divided down strict party lines and today's proceedings just highlighted that. And calling it "bipartisan" when TWO Democrats opposed is nonsense. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 minute ago, snafu said: Meh, it was a procedure vote. These guys should shut it at this time. This wasn't a vote to open an inquiry, that option doesn't exist. The inquiry is happening. This wasn't a vote to issue articles of impeachment. They should save these statement for later. It also doesn't look so great that Congress, the two major political parties, and the country are so divided down strict party lines and today's proceedings just highlighted that. And calling it "bipartisan" when TWO Democrats opposed is nonsense. For three weeks the leaders on the left have been calling it bi partisan when they didn't get a single R vote. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Tibs, your thread title is wrong... Fact: Pelosi's inquiry is the first "presidential impeachment inquiry" to be authorized by anybody. That, alone, demonstrates how farcical this is. They're putting on show votes to authorize something that doesn't need to be authorized. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Quick to judgeQuick to angerSlow to understandIgnorance and prejudiceAnd fear walk hand in hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 All you need to know about this farce is that Adam Schiff has the right to prevent witnesses from testifying if they are subpoenaed by a Republican. One would think that the Republicans must be so far removed from reality that they might call John Dean to the stand. -) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 What goes around comes around Dems.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And this is fundamentally dishonest, since it's the Senate that renders the verdict. White House is trying to cloud the issue. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: All you need to know about this farce is that Adam Schiff has the right to prevent witnesses from testifying if they are subpoenaed by a Republican. One would think that the Republicans Democrats must be so far removed from reality that they might call John Dean to the stand. -) FIFY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 We have no candidate to seriously run for the Dems in 2020 so we will act this petulantly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, Foxx said: FIFY -) means tongue-in-cheek. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Does Tibs need to change the title of this thread to either: partisan support of impeachment or non-partisan opposition to impeachment i mean, the only bi-partisan support in today’s vote was the 2 democrats who crossed party lines and voted against the formal inquiry? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 41 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: lol looks like something like you would write - total BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Tibs, your thread title is wrong... As is this whole process. I would think people would be less eager to trust proven liars and manipulators than we're seeing, but dummies gonna dumb. "The only bi-partisan vote on that floor, was against (impeachment)." McCarthy just now. Hah. Beat me to it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 22 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And this is fundamentally dishonest, since it's the Senate that renders the verdict. White House is trying to cloud the issue. I generally follow your logic but on this one I see no dishonesty. The Dems =all dems, including the aforementioned Enrica Pelosi and Schumer. Move through the house, to the Senate, dems want to render a verdict. It reads like a statement from a press secretary for a political party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: How in the world did his inquiry ‘hurt our election integrity’? Well, you see, conducting an inquiry into a Democrat who is running for office is interfering in an election. So sayeth those Democrats who are conducing an "inquiry" into the President running for office in order to interfere with the same election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I generally follow your logic but on this one I see no dishonesty. The Dems =all dems, including the aforementioned Enrica Pelosi and Schumer. Move through the house, to the Senate, dems want to render a verdict. It reads like a statement from a press secretary for a political party. The dems in the House can have a verdict and that verdict would be to pass the case on to the Senate for trial. The House verdict is called impeachment. The press secretary's letter was fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 19 minutes ago, dubs said: Does Tibs need to change the title of this thread to either: partisan support of impeachment or non-partisan opposition to impeachment i mean, the only bi-partisan support in today’s vote was the 2 democrats who crossed party lines and voted against the formal inquiry? How about "Nonunanimous Dem support for impeachment"? And screw it, have a mod change it for Tibs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1189951422701260801 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts