Jump to content

Bi-Partisan Support For Impeachment


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Foxx said:

 

Determining House procedure lies solely with the House.  Which means that the House has the sole responsibility of determining how they pursue impeachment.  So let's go check the parlimentary rules for the current sitting House, and see what they say about impeachment.  They say...

 

...nothing.  There are no defined impeachment procedures.  They basically half-ass it on the fly.  

 

But - and this is important - they have a Constitutional right to determine their impeachment procedure as "half-assing it on the fly."  It's like McConnell's hold-up of the Garland nomination: stupid, juvenile, counter-productive, and entirely Constitutional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Determining House procedure lies solely with the House.  Which means that the House has the sole responsibility of determining how they pursue impeachment.  So let's go check the parlimentary rules for the current sitting House, and see what they say about impeachment.  They say...

 

...nothing.  There are no defined impeachment procedures.  They basically half-ass it on the fly.  

 

But - and this is important - they have a Constitutional right to determine their impeachment procedure as "half-assing it on the fly."  It's like McConnell's hold-up of the Garland nomination: stupid, juvenile, counter-productive, and entirely Constitutional.

how do we know the House actually supports this star chamber impeachment inquiry and that it is not just upon the whims of president wannabe Pelosi and her cohorts? it could be that they are intimidated into silent acquiescence by her standing. without a vote to express the will of the entire House, it is, as you say... half-assing it.

 

at some point the transcripts will have to be released. because of the on the fly routine here, who knows if they will before there is a vote on articles of impeachment but it will have to be done as supporting evidence of their article(s) of impeachment that gets forwarded to the Senate for a trial.

 

this is all grandstanding to minimize their ineptitude.  if they learned anything from the Mueller Report hearings, it is that they learned to not let their agenda get B word slapped in the public eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

how do we know the House actually supports this star chamber impeachment inquiry and that it is not just upon the whims of president wannabe Pelosi and her cohorts? it could be that they are intimidated into silent acquiescence by her standing. without a vote to express the will of the entire House, it is, as you say... half-assing it.

 

at some point the transcripts will have to be released. because of the on the fly routine here, who knows if they will before there is a vote on articles of impeachment but it will have to be done as supporting evidence of their article(s) of impeachment that gets forwarded to the Senate for a trial.

 

this is all grandstanding to minimize their ineptitude.  if they learned anything from the Mueller Report hearings, it is that they learned to not let their agenda get B word slapped in the public eye.

 

Still Constitutional.  The Houses of Congress have sole discretion to determine their rules of proceedings, including how they determine their rules of proceedings.  There's nothing that says the House can't simply allow the Speaker to make it up as he goes along.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

Still Constitutional.  The Houses of Congress have sole discretion to determine their rules of proceedings, including how they determine their rules of proceedings.  There's nothing that says the House can't simply allow the Speaker to make it up as he goes along.  

 

An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.  Gerald Ford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE JOURNOLIST IS HOPPING: No More Pretense: Journalists, Dems Use Identical Talking Points on Impeachment (Video).

 

Just think of the media as Democratic Party operatives with Chyrons, and their lockstep phraseology all makes sense.

 

 

 

 

 

I said this after the First debate.................

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Coups don't need to follow any rules.  If this is a coup, they should just arrest those whining 9 Republicans.  That would send a good message to the rest of the Republicans.  This is a coup and if any stinkin Republican gets in the way, we should put them up against the wall....just like we would see in a real coup.

 

What?  Not happening?  Hmm, maybe we are witnessing a highly partisan, fully constitutional, political impeachment process and not a coup?  Just a thought

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Coups don't need to follow any rules.  If this is a coup, they should just arrest those whining 9 Republicans.  That would send a good message to the rest of the Republicans.  This is a coup and if any stinkin Republican gets in the way, we should put them up against the wall....just like we would see in a real coup.

 

What?  Not happening?  Hmm, maybe we are witnessing a highly partisan, fully constitutional, political impeachment process and not a coup?  Just a thought

 

The coup has been ongoing since 2017 -- and hasn't been done in broad daylight because they know the people do not support it. Doing it out in the open would lead to the complete unraveling of the country into sectarian violence. 

 

...And you still didn't answer me earlier. Do you, Bob, still believe that Russia and Trump worked together to steal the 2016 election?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Coups don't need to follow any rules.  If this is a coup, they should just arrest those whining 9 Republicans.  That would send a good message to the rest of the Republicans.  This is a coup and if any stinkin Republican gets in the way, we should put them up against the wall....just like we would see in a real coup.

 

What?  Not happening?  Hmm, maybe we are witnessing a highly partisan, fully constitutional, political impeachment process and not a coup?  Just a thought

 

Nah dude it's a coup you stinky pothead

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The coup has been ongoing since 2017 -- and hasn't been done in broad daylight because they know the people do not support it. Doing it out in the open would lead to the complete unraveling of the country into sectarian violence. 

 

...And you still didn't answer me earlier. Do you, Bob, still believe that Russia and Trump worked together to steal the 2016 election?

 

Just stop with the coup talk.  It is incorrect as well as inflammatory and you know that.   As I just pointed out, why would coup leaders be following any rules?  They wouldn't.  Power is taken without an impeachment process in a real coup.  In addition, this current inquiry surrounds Trumps actions in 2019.

 

There are some less stable folks around here, ahem TYTT, that could be convinced this is an actual takeover and so convinced that he needs to gun down his neighbors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...