IgotBILLStopay Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/raiders/nfl-rumors-jets-determined-trade-down-no-3-pick-draft Quote Sources told SNY's Ralph Vacchiano that the Jets are "determined" to trade down from the No. 3 overall pick in the draft. "They seem to really, really want to move down," one NFL executive said to Vacchiano. "Maybe they're just keeping their options open, but it sure seems like that No. 3 pick is for sale." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 9 and a third and get the deal done. If they want to sell the pick that bad 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Hmmm; if only there was already a thread on this... 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgotBILLStopay Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 Two implications for the Bills - One, it makes trade up a little less costly since it will be a little bit of a buyer's market. Two, chances are a team trading up will do so for a QB or for a shot at Bosa / Q. Williams. The earlier Williams goes off the board the less chance Ed Oliver is available at 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Can we just fast forward to Thursday already 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgotBILLStopay Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, aristocrat said: 9 and a third and get the deal done. If they want to sell the pick that bad 9 and a third wont even get us to #5, let alone #3, mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 minute ago, IgotBILLStopay said: 9 and a third wont even get us to #5, let alone #3, mate. Sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgotBILLStopay Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 Just now, aristocrat said: Sarcasm oops my bad. sry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da webster guy Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Jets have enough new additions coming, and they'll have a chance to get QW or Bosa, probably the closest to a sure thing on the Dline we've seen in a long time. Of course any team will trade down for the right offer, but getting a stud Dlineman is something the Jets need. I doubt they move anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 4 hours ago, Da webster guy said: Jets have enough new additions coming, and they'll have a chance to get QW or Bosa, probably the closest to a sure thing on the Dline we've seen in a long time. Of course any team will trade down for the right offer, but getting a stud Dlineman is something the Jets need. I doubt they move anywhere. I can't see Bosa sliding past 2. Q Williams could slide to the Jets pick but they need someone more like LB Josh Allen and why they want to move down but it maybe foolish as could see the Raiders taking him at 4 too. Of course the Raiders could take QWill if he fell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 14 hours ago, IgotBILLStopay said: https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/raiders/nfl-rumors-jets-determined-trade-down-no-3-pick-draft What happened to taking Oliver at 3 ? Now they want to trade down ? I’m sure when I wake up in the morning there will be a new thread “ Jets are strongly considering moving up “ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsredneck1 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 well if murray doesn't go at no. 1, that pick may command a haul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bogie_Klinkhammer Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Poker is a wonderful game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 8 minutes ago, HOUSE said: Poker is a wonderful game Poker?! I don’t even know her! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 The Jets haven't had a good pass rusher since John Abraham. Before that it was Mark Gastineau in the 80's? They'd be wise to stay put and draft Bosa or Allen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 8 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: The Jets haven't had a good pass rusher since John Abraham. Before that it was Mark Gastineau in the 80's? They'd be wise to stay put and draft Bosa or Allen. When's the last time the Jest did something wise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 3 hours ago, Taro T said: When's the last time the Jest did something wise? December 29, 2014. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: December 29, 2014. Is firing one bad coach when they end up replacing him with another bad one truly "wise?" Figuring the last truly wise thing they did probably harkens back to the 60's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster19 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 I bet that they want to slide down, grab some extra pick(s) and then take 1 of them OL. Remember, they spent a boatload of money on Bell, I’m sure that they want to make him effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 hours ago, Taro T said: Is firing one bad coach when they end up replacing him with another bad one truly "wise?" Figuring the last truly wise thing they did probably harkens back to the 60's. Agreed. Please do remember I was looking at ‘wise’ as a relative term...? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts