DC Tom Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Romney could run for President in 2020 on the exact same campaign platform he used in 2012, and be the Democrats' darling. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 22 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Romney could run for President in 2020 on the exact same campaign platform he used in 2012, and be the Democrats' darling. but he sucks...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 Romney is jealous that he couldn't beat a crap Democratic candidate for President but Trump did. Otherwise, Romney needs to go into hiding where he belongs. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 4 hours ago, njbuff said: Romney is jealous that he couldn't beat a crap Democratic candidate for President but Trump did. Otherwise, Romney needs to go into hiding where he belongs. Blow out your candles, Mitt, pick them off the cake one at a time, and so goodbye... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 Trump rekt Romney 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 LOL 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 There are several basic, factual errors in the Mueller report. They're all dates... why would they be changing when certain things happened in the report? To hide and obscure what truly caused the FBI to open its investigation. It wasn't Downer and G-Pop. It wasn't Steele. It was Admiral Rogers shutting down their illegal spying operation inside the DOJ/FBI. ***************** This is blatant circular intelligence -- intentionally and knowingly created by the FBI and their media cut outs to bolster their case. Mueller's team (Weissman) relied upon these fundamentally flawed articles as verification while omitting the proven contacts ongoing between these two specific reporters and Strzok/Page. Remember: Ken is nicknamed "Fusion Ken" because he's on Fusion GPS's payroll. He also is a confirmed CIA mouthpiece who got in trouble multiple times for running stories by his CIA handlers before publication. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 New party, who dat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: There are several basic, factual errors in the Mueller report. They're all dates... why would they be changing when certain things happened in the report? To hide and obscure what truly caused the FBI to open its investigation. It wasn't Downer and G-Pop. It wasn't Steele. It was Admiral Rogers shutting down their illegal spying operation inside the DOJ/FBI. Those aren't factual errors, they're typographical errors. Which is even worse, for its unprofessionalism. How do you proofread so poorly that you don't catch having Sessions as AG before the election? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Those aren't factual errors, they're typographical errors. Which is even worse, for its unprofessionalism. How do you proofread so poorly that you don't catch having Sessions as AG before the election? It's embarrassing. And should remind people that what they're reading in this report isn't infallible. It's a one sided, uncontested report created for political purposes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 21, 2019 Share Posted April 21, 2019 14 hours ago, /dev/null said: Trump rekt Romney The Child in Chief. Jesus..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-met-mueller-report-kass-20190419-story.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 Blanche DuBois indeed. We need to start using that on the Colluders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 22 minutes ago, Nanker said: Blanche DuBois indeed. We need to start using that on the Colluders. Blanche was really a dude in the creator's mind.... \ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Secrecy? Who needs that? It might influence the next election if this is exposed! BREAKING NEWS Trump and his business sue to block congressional subpoena of financial records President Trump is seeking a court order to prevent his accounting firm from complying with what his lawyers say is an illegitimate use of congressional subpoena power by congressional Democrats. By John Wagner 16 minutes ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 2 22 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's embarrassing. And should remind people that what they're reading in this report isn't infallible. It's a one sided, uncontested report created for political purposes. Now I am befuddled..Trump and his supporters say it totally exonerates him ..no collusion, no obstruction. Are you saying Mueller and DOJ teamed up in favor of Trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 @plenzmd1 There are two reports... volume 1 (the one that clears him) and volume 2 (the opinion piece). Guess which ones the MSM has been reporting? Honestly? If you are not going to take the time to read the source documents yourself, you are never going to understand what has happened. When people say it was a soft-coup, they are not exaggerating. President Trump committed no crimes. After two years of having his underwear examined, they came up with nothing. Zip, nada, zero. Nothing. I am shocked as I did not believe he was that clean. I am also shocked as I truly expected the SC "dream team" to manufacturer something so they could charge him with a crime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Now I am befuddled..Trump and his supporters say it totally exonerates him ..no collusion, no obstruction. Are you saying Mueller and DOJ teamed up in favor of Trump? 1) It does exonerate him fully on the charges of collusion/conspiracy. More than that, it disproves the veracity of the Steele Dossier, proves the SCO/FBI were relying on the dossier after they already knew it was bunk to prolong the investigation while also laying bare the circular intel loop created by Fusion GPS, the FBI and media outlets like the WaPo and NYTs. On all those points, volume one is definitive. 2) Volume two lays out "evidence" of obstruction without making a determination as to its worth. Said evidence of obstruction is almost entirely uncontested testimony that may or may not be true. There was no cross, and almost all of the points in favor of obstruction were backed up - again - by news articles written by the usual suspects in the circular intel loop. Trump was not provided the opportunity to defend himself or challenge these assertations (which, is not the point of the report but shouldn't be overlooked or brushed aside). Barr ruled on obstruction, there was no corrupt intent because Trump knew he was innocent and was reacting to the continuous lies and accusations which were hurled at him on a minute by minute basis for the past two years. Yes - he ranted and raved. But he didn't do anything to obstruct the investigation. He didn't fire Mueller. He didn't fire anyone on the SCO team. He didn't interfere in any way. In fact, he was more open and transparent than they expected. Making an obstruction case is a Herculean task, Barr made his ruling and that case is closed. The only thing left is the politics of it all. The criminal and legal proceedings are done and settled. And settled in Trump's favor. "Are you saying Mueller and DOJ teamed up in favor of Trump?": I've maintained for over two years that Mueller was not working against Trump, nor was his primary purpose to "get" Trump. He was given a deal, and he took it. His job was to contain the bad actors in the DOJ who were complicit in the coup attempt and keep them in one group where he could prevent them from disappearing back into the bureaucratic ether where they could do untold damage from the shadows. The SCO team's job was to siphon up any and all evidence - not of Trump's misdeeds though that was part, but also all the evidence of the egregious criminal violations committed by Obama's DOJ in their entrapment of Trump and his team. While the SCO team was siphoning up this evidence of their own misdeeds to bury it - Mueller was passing it along to IG Horowitz to make the criminal cases which will be coming next. Meanwhile, the press and partisans on the left married themselves to Mueller over the past two years. Thanks to Trump's twitter fingers and their rampant TDS making them disagree with anything he says, these sorts of people elevated Mueller to unimpeachable status. He was a good cop, he'd make a fair decision. They tried to pass legislation to protect him from being fired because he was GOING to deliver the knock out blow. This attachment was part of the plan too - because in the end, Mueller authored a report which exonerated Trump in full on the conspiracy/collusion charges -- while creating a blueprint from which they could criminally charge bad actors for previously un-chargable offenses such as lying to the FBI, Congress, and FARA violations. If you doubt this - take note of how few people in the media or resistance are even mentioning Volume One. They've focused entirely on Volume Two - and expect the public not to remember that for two years they've said conspiracy/collusion didn't just happen - but was ongoing and treasonous in its scope. That narrative has been blown out of the water by the Mueller report. All the hand wringing and teeth gnashing we've seen in the media shouting "THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN!" are now seen for what they truly were: bull####. We've got another week, maybe two, of the partisans on both sides cherry picking sections of the report to bolster their cases - but in the end it's moot. The report is done and it cleared Trump on collusion, conspiracy - and yes, obstruction. No charges will be brought against him or his team. It's over. At least it's over with Trump in the targeting sights. Now it's Obama's turn in the crosshairs. And he's not going to come out of the investigations to come as clean as Trump has. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Quote Trump was not provided the opportunity to defend himself or challenge these assertations ? uhhh???? Now I am really confused. The same dude who answered 37 times he could not remember in writing because he refused to sit down for an interview was somehow denied the ability to challenge assertions? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts