Jump to content

How can we not be all in on Metcalf now?


Recommended Posts

On 3/3/2019 at 12:13 PM, ytownblofan said:

Not a chance. Jam him at the line with safety help over the top and he becomes a non-factor. A wr that can’t change direction and has a limited route tree becomes easy to defend, freak or not. 

 

Exactly. He's a pitcher with a 105 mph fastball and not much else.

 

They'll find chunks of him in pro DBs' stool. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

 

For me, the best usage of a top-10 pick is on a franchise QB.  Obviously, that's not where Buffalo is going this year, and that's fine. The next best usage IMO is on a game-changing offensive playmaker, pass rusher, or corner. When I try to evaluate who has the best chance of being a game-changer in the NFL, I'm looking to optimize between a track-record of playing the position at a high level in college and the eye-popping measurables (and, of course, you want the intangibles as well).

 

So, when I look at the top-10 talent non-QBs in this class (listed, in no particular order, below), who checks the boxes?

Nick Bosa

Quinnen Williams

Josh Allen

DK Metcalf

Josh Jacobs

Ed Oliver

Christian Wilkins

Jawaan Taylor

Rashan Gary

Devin White

Jeffrey Simmons

TJ Hockenson

 

For me, the guys I think qualify as having both a track-record of playing the position at a high level in college and the eye-popping measurables, and can fill one of the critical roles of offensive playmaker, pass-rusher, or corner, are: Bosa, Williams, Allen, Jacobs, Oliver, Wilkins, and Simmons. I'm leery of guys that do incredibly stupid things off the field, so Simmons probably falls off my board. I'm also not huge on first-round RBs given the shelf-life, so Jacobs wouldn't be my guy either.

 

That leaves Bosa, Williams, Allen, Oliver, and Wilkins for me.  I thin there's probably an 80% chance that one of them is there at 9, so that's where I'd go at this point.

 

 

Now if Josh Allen is on the board and DK is also on the board, that's when I would have a difficult decision.  He's the only potentially available defender I'd do that for.  To me, what the Bills need on defense is an edge rusher opposite of Hughes.  I'm not sure I'd take an interior DL over Metcalf looking at the Bills.  If I'm another team I probably would.  But the Bills, the only guy I'd take over Metcalf at 9 is Allen.  This current NFL is two things to me.  Score points and get to the QB.  Great defense IMO has been redefined.  You have to be efficient against the run, but you don't have to be smothering.  But beyond a shadow of a doubt it is a necessity that you get to the QB.  So for me, I'd be happy with Allen or Metcalf at 9; Maybe even Sweat.  I think the other areas can be supplemented in other ways.

Edited by NewEraBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEraBills said:

 

 

Now if Josh Allen is on the board and DK is also on the board, that's when I would have a difficult decision.  He's the only defender I'd do that for.  To me, what the Bills need on defense is an edge rusher opposite of Hughes.  I'm not sure I'd take an interior DL over Metcalf looking at the Bills.  If I'm another team I probably would.  But the Bills, the only guy I'd take over Metcalf at 9 is Allen.  This current NFL is two things to me.  Score points and get to the QB.  Great defense IMO has been redefined.  You have to be efficient against the run, but you don't have to be smothering.  But beyond a shadow of a doubt it is a necessity that you get to the QB.  So for me, I'd be happy with Allen or Metcalf at 9; Maybe even Sweat.  I think the other areas can be supplemented in other ways.

 

I absolutely agree with the bold, which is why I have guys like Oliver, Williams, and Wilkins listed.  The impact of interior pass rushers like Aaron Donald and Chris Jones is as much of a factor in disrupting QBs as the EDGE guys.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thebandit27 said:

 

I absolutely agree with the bold, which is why I have guys like Oliver, Williams, and Wilkins listed.  The impact of interior pass rushers like Aaron Donald and Chris Jones is as much of a factor in disrupting QBs as the EDGE guys.

 

The more pressure you can generate without blitzing, the better. What also helps is that Brady does not like pressure up the middle 0:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

 

I absolutely agree with the bold, which is why I have guys like Oliver, Williams, and Wilkins listed.  The impact of interior pass rushers like Aaron Donald and Chris Jones is as much of a factor in disrupting QBs as the EDGE guys.

 

I can agree with that.

5 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

 

The more pressure you can generate without blitzing, the better. What also helps is that Brady does not like pressure up the middle 0:)

 

No QB does.  

 

Your Edge guys tend to put up more sack numbers and pressures though.  That's why I think Edge is a priority over interior.  But ultimately, you get it where you can get it.

Edited by NewEraBills
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, matter2003 said:

Dude reminds me of David Boston...does he want to become a bodybuilder or a football player?  Eventually he is going to lift himself into constant injuries on the footbal field and shorten his career.

Flexibility is extremely important to top receivers. Without it, he's just a physical freak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2019 at 9:09 AM, Dr. Who said:

Below Average
3-cone: 7.38
Short Shuttle: 4.50

 

DL appears to have outstanding talent likely to be available at nine. Metcalf should be considered, but it's far from a no-brainer. Pretty deep WR class, so second round should have some good players that fit what we are trying to do.

Straight line speed and freakish strength only go so far. Case in point David Boston. I want a guy with fast twitch muscles and the ability to cut and get open. Foster can be our fly guy. Metcalf is tempting but his 3 cone was poor. Isabella in the 2nd round? What are DK's hands like? What's his drop ratio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HeHateMe said:

 

I don't think it's smart use of the 9th overall pick.. Reminds me of 2014 trading up for Watkins which was a huge mistake.  We could of stayed at our pick and got OBJ in the first round.  Or waited later in the draft to get wayyy better value picks in Cooks, Davante Adams, Allen Robinson, Jarvis Landry, etc.  This WR draft may look like that year.

 

I agree. With the rare 1st round exception,  good to very good wrs can be had in rounds 2-4. Every 1st round pick for the next few years has to be a home run starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2019 at 5:28 PM, OldTimer1960 said:

I’d rather see them bolster the OL.

 

At this point, it looks almost certain that BPA at their pick will be a DL, likely by a wide margin.  So, I expect a DL in the 1st.  After that, I’d love to see an OL player like Risner or Bradbury or McCoy or...

 

Unless they sign two starting caliber OL in FA, I cannot see how they could take a WR or TE in the first 3 rounds.  Now, if they trade down in round 1 and pick up an extra 2nd, then maybe they could grab a pass catcher in the first 3 rounds.

I  can see them taking one of each in the 2-4.

no for pass catcher at 9 this season please.

 

you are correct about BPA and D Line  at nine. fingers crossed for Beanes witchery to correct the O line and TE mostly in FA. and the options open up for the draft a bit more ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NewEra said:

Obviously, the team doesn’t have the view that only Dante Scarnecchia can develop an OL.  

 

That would be giving up on the OL and obviously that’s not going to happen.  You act as if no good teams draft OL in the first 2 rds.  

 

 

Ok so tell me how many team recently draft OL in the 1st round get to the SB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillsFan130 said:

Nate Solder, New England. 2 SB wins for him . (Playing devils advocate here)

 

And they let him walk for a 5th round player. Point is sorry if people think OL in the early rounds is a sure thing. It isn’t with the way colleges are today. 

 

It it used to be, but changed and the only ones that don’t see it are stuck in old school football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

And they let him walk for a 5th round player. Point is sorry if people think OL in the early rounds is a sure thing. It isn’t with the way colleges are today. 

 

It it used to be, but changed and the only ones that don’t see it are stuck in old school football. 

And how many 1st rd receivers get to the SB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NewEraBills said:

To me you draft him and ask him to do the following:

 

1)  Screens

2)  9/Go routes

3) Deep Post routes

4)  Slants

5)  Deep Crossers

 

You don't ask him to run double move routes that's all.  I'd say he's a Demaryius Thomas archetype with more speed and explosiveness.  To me he fits in great with Josh Allen's abilities.  Now that I think about it I would probably actually try to also get a guy like Andy Isabella if he's still there in the 3rd and have him man the slot.  He can run all of the quicks and double moves.  That would me bye to Zay unless he can show he has the agility and speed to get open on the short routes.

 

Why would you want someone at #9 with aimited route tree? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

And they let him walk for a 5th round player. Point is sorry if people think OL in the early rounds is a sure thing. It isn’t with the way colleges are today. 

 

It it used to be, but changed and the only ones that don’t see it are stuck in old school football. 

Fair points, was just answering your question.

 

Colts haven’t been to a SB recently but that Nelson pick is looking pretty great for them so far.

 

But ya picking a OL high is definitely not a sure thing. The draft at the end of the day is a crapshoot for the most part.

Edited by BillsFan130
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

The potential combination of Allen to Metcalf should make any Bills fan smile.  Metcalf helps Allen tremendously.  That's where I'm at.

 

After free agency, we'll get more of a sense of what Beane may do in the draft.

 

How does he help Allen any more than someone who could be taken in the second round? What skills does he have, or has shown, that would offer Allen consistency improvement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:

Fair points, was just answering your question.

 

Colts haven’t been to a SB recently but that Nelson pick is looking pretty great for them so far.

 

But ya picking a OL high is definitely not a sure thing. The draft at the end of the day is a crapshoot for the most part.

 

I agree with this. General thought, not necessarily directed at you:  From the Bills current situation, can they afford to miss in the first round at WR or OL? 

 

To me, I don't think the risk is worth the reward at WR, especially with a player like Metcalf. Allen needs consistent, reliable play makers. They can't afford to wait around for your first round pick to develop into the WR you hoped he would become. 

 

I'd rather see them get someone with a high floor at WR, whether they draft one or get someone from free agency. Take 9 and improve the trenches with a plug and play that can immediately help your team abd offers little risk of impedeing Allen's development 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, HeHateMe said:

We just had an oft-injured WR in Watkins.  9 has to be a sure thing.  This is a deep class for WR and I think we can get really good talent in rounds 2-4.  

 

3 red flags right off the bat:

 

-Not a lot of production on college

-A lot of games missed due to injury

-Poor agility in tests

His agility numbers are very similar to Randy Moss and Metcalf has much better explosive numbers, vertical and broad jump.  Tall guys dont excel in the shuttle or 3 cone that's why many including Calvin Johnson decline them.  People blasting Metcalf and tout Harry when he ran much slower and didn't test his agility to protect his draft status is funny.  As an outside Metcalf has prototypical size.  His 40 shows when you watch him.  He has another gear on deep passes.  He routinely has seperation on his intermediate and beyond routes.  I want to enhance Allen's biggest gift.  His arm. Give him a rare deep threat talent.  That opens things up for all the other aspects of the passing game. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BuffAlone said:

And how many 1st rd receivers get to the SB?

 

Off top of my head well there is Jones, Jeffery to name two quick ones. 

 

I am not opposed to OL to help Allen. But to think a first round OL is a “fix” and ANY less risky in today’s NFL is asinine 

Edited by MAJBobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...