Nanker Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 No collusion. No obstruction. Nothingburger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 He's a criminal that just has not been nailed to the wall yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yeah, that whole 'lack of proof' thing is a real B word, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 Just now, Koko78 said: Yeah, that whole 'lack of proof' thing is a real B word, isn't it? Lack of proof? There is no lack of proof. He obviously obstructed justice. Even Republicans are admitting this now. He obviously was involved in a hush money payment to a porn actress. Ya, he's a criminal. We are only seeing more and more evidence as the cover ups unravel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 22 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ah yes, it's so "obvious" that there doesn't need to be proof, right? Clearly he "obstructed" the investigation into a fabricated "offense" by protesting his innocence. How dare he! He should be immediately impeached and a trial scheduled before the Senate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 24 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Lack of proof? There is no lack of proof. He obviously obstructed justice. Even Republicans are admitting this now. He obviously was involved in a hush money payment to a porn actress. Ya, he's a criminal. We are only seeing more and more evidence as the cover ups unravel. HAHA Gator, you ignorant slut. He paid a ***** to keep her mouth shut, not to open it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Ah yes, it's so "obvious" that there doesn't need to be proof, right? Clearly he "obstructed" the investigation into a fabricated "offense" by protesting his innocence. How dare he! He should be immediately impeached and a trial scheduled before the Senate. No, he actually obstructed justice. He is protected by the political bias of people like you who think he should be above the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 27 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, he actually obstructed justice. He is protected by the political bias of people like you who think he should be above the law. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: HAHA Gator, you ignorant slut. He paid a ***** to keep her mouth shut, not to open it. The really funny part is that she wound up paying HIM in the end. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 36 minutes ago, Hedge said: You are a Trumptard. I mean what standing do you have to insult ANYONE's intelligence? Seriously? 21 minutes ago, Koko78 said: The really funny part is that she wound up paying HIM in the end. The funny part is that Trump is "Individual Number One" in the indictment! HA HA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2019 Author Share Posted May 20, 2019 Yup, just another criminal investigation with witness giving testimony, foreign money, convictions already and boy, Trump better win in 2020 or he might seriously go to jail https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/cnn-sdny-trump-inaugural-probe On 5/15/2019 at 8:10 AM, SoCal Deek said: Since these are co-equal branches of government I’d like to know when it’s the President’s turn to start calling members of Congress into his office for public shamings (hearings). That ought to be must see TV! Talk to Mitch McConnel, you do realize GOP controls the senate, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yup, just another criminal investigation with witness giving testimony, foreign money, convictions already and boy, Trump better win in 2020 or he might seriously go to jail https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/cnn-sdny-trump-inaugural-probe Talk to Mitch McConnel, you do realize GOP controls the senate, right? lol. you do realize quite a number of your boys are going to jail, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 36 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Talk to Mitch McConnel, you do realize GOP controls the senate, right? You realize that the Senate is not the boss of the House, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 5 hours ago, Koko78 said: The really funny part is that she wound up paying HIM in the end. Trump got a porn star to pay him for sex and the #resistance to pay his legal fees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 On 5/15/2019 at 8:10 AM, SoCal Deek said: Since these are co-equal branches of government I’d like to know when it’s the President’s turn to start calling members of Congress into his office for public shamings (hearings). That ought to be must see TV! House wins court battle over Trumps financial records. Because, of course congress can investigate the president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: House wins court battle over Trumps financial records. Because, of course congress can investigate the president the judge was an Obama-Biden donor. FIFY https://twitter.com/Surabees/status/1130613421538459649 Edited May 21, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: FIFY https://twitter.com/Surabees/status/1130613421538459649 It will be interesting if the conservatives on the Supreme Court rule this president is above the law. What next? Elections are unconstitutional? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: It will be interesting if the conservatives on the Supreme Court rule this president is above the law. What next? Elections are unconstitutional? above the law? understand what you are advocating for here - the ability of the state to obtain your private financial information to be used in any way they see fit. also, do you not understand that we are talking about the IRS here and if anything, anything was untoward with his taxes, he would be audited and then if anything were found to be out of order, he would face legal consequences, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: above the law? understand what you are advocating for here - the ability of the state to obtain your private financial information to be used in any way they see fit. also, do you not understand that we are talking about the IRS here and if anything, anything was untoward with his taxes, he would be audited and then if anything were found to be out of order, he would face legal consequences, right? I find it telling that a judge ruled the House could subpoena on a whim, and yet a member of his own branch of government needs probable cause and a warrant to get this same type of information. If there really is all this supposed evidence against Trump, then why don't they just follow legal precedent and swear out a warrant? Point is, the House is acting as if THEY are the superior branch of government... The true definition of Tyranny.. Where does it stop? Is Nadler going to next issue a no knock raid of Trump Tower? Or maybe even the White House? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 47 minutes ago, Foxx said: above the law? understand what you are advocating for here - the ability of the state to obtain your private financial information to be used in any way they see fit. also, do you not understand that we are talking about the IRS here and if anything, anything was untoward with his taxes, he would be audited and then if anything were found to be out of order, he would face legal consequences, right? Tons of precedent for investigations. Hundreds of years of it. If this President has ties to a foreign power the American people have a right to know. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts