Jump to content

Impeachment Hearings Open In House Of Representatives


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Because she is trying to outrun a jail cell herself?

If she wasn't prosecuted over this why would she ever be prosecuted for anything?

 

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/nancy-pelosi-starkist-tuna/

 

No more StarKist Tuna for me …..

SNOPES” VALIDATES THE FACTS BELOW :

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s home district includes San Francisco .

 

Report this ad

 

StarKist Tuna’s headquarters are in San Francisco , Pelosi’s home district.

StarKist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi.

StarKist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force.

Paul Pelosi, Nancy’s husband, owns $17 million dollars of StarKist stock.

In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25,

Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase

So Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage.

This would make Del Monte products less expensive than that of its competitors.

Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,

Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill

adding $33 million dollars for an “economic development credit in American Samoa ”

Pelosi has called the Bush Administration “CORRUPT” and many other things !!!

How do you spell “HYPOCRISY” ?

SHE’S SHAMELESS….

EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD GET THIS E-MAIL.

PASS IT AROUND …!!!

I’ll buy the other brands now. I’m not putting another dollar in Pelosi’s bank account.

 
 
Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...But... But Schiff has said for years he has evidence of treasonous collusion between Trump and Russia. 

 

 

 

Why the focus on this (non story) if he has such damning evidence to share with the world (which he did not share with Mueller, his own committee, or the Senate's so far)?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

...But... But Schiff has said for years he has evidence of treasonous collusion between Trump and Russia. 

 

 

 

Why the focus on this (non story) if he has such damning evidence to share with the world (which he did not share with Mueller, his own committee, or the Senate's so far)?

 

The goalposts keep moving.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's so transparent now even those who bought fully into the Trump/Russia hoax should be able to see it by now. 

 

Probably not. TDS is a powerful force.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2019 at 12:03 PM, B-Man said:

Lol, it's more like Trump has done so many things that are impeachable that they can't decide which is the worst. Heck, we have argued over a few of them. 

32 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's so transparent now even those who bought fully into the Trump/Russia hoax should be able to see it by now. 

When you say Russia Hoax, what do you mean? 

 

That's kind of outrageous to say it's a hoax. Hard to believe how you guys just completely ignore facts that are well known and documented

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

Lol, it's more like Trump has done so many things that are impeachable that they can't decide which is the worst. Heck, we have argued over a few of them. 

 

 

 

LOL...............someone didn't read the article again.

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Isn't that caused by Josh Allen's arm strength?

 

?

 

Post reported. Stop bringing that football crap on to this board. 

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2019 at 6:35 AM, B-Man said:
lu·na·tic
/ˈlo͞onəˌtik/
noun
  1. 1.
    a mentally ill person (not in technical use).
    synonyms: maniac, madman, madwoman, psychopath, psychotic; More

 

Image result for Democratic Party    ...........Pelosi tells Dems she wants to see Trump ‘in prison’

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/05/pelosi-impeachment-1355435

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2019 at 9:04 AM, Tiberius said:

Have we ever had an election marked by hacked information that was weaponized and used against a candidate by a foreign power before? Mr Secret Trump went against a candidate who had all her information--private information--hacked and weaponized against her.

 

That was an attack on our system like no other. And almost certainly changed votes or suppressed some. 

 

The Russuans also at the very least tried hacking voting systems, voting machine companies and election officials. 

 

That deserved investigation free of obstruction, do you agree? 

The answer to your question is hidden in plain sight. They are everywhere.  

IMG_0313.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...