Jump to content

Robert Kraft charged in prostitution ring bust ( Update: Kraft legal team accused of lying in court)


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

I can’t speak for everyone but I think it has  more to do with the arrogance of Kraft. Most fans on this board are biased because of football, but if they felt that he was a decent guy I don’t think the snarkiness would be as thick. 

Yep. Robert Kraft is a phony son of a b**ch. Spare me the rhetoric about how his philanthropic activities prove he’s a decent guy. I don’t think there’s a decent bone in his inebriated body. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Toesy said:

What do you guys think internet porn is? It is Prostitution plain and simple-and a huge business. So anybody that has ever viewed internet porn supports Prostitution. Period.

 

What the hell is internet porn????

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BarleyNY said:

 

That would be a common misconception.  People who support illegal prostitution absolutely are contributing to human trafficking as they create the demand for it.  The vast majority of prostitutes - the ones with pimps - cannot leave their profession, except in a body bag.

Be careful. You seem a bit too logical for many here. However, you are 100% correct.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

To each his own.  I suppose I'm above that.

 

Congrats.

 

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

No his lawyers accused, in court, the cop that did the traffic stop of fabricating the reason for the stop (which the prosecutor pretty much already conceded).  The prosecutor is now, a week later (not while he was standing there, in court when the accusation was made) saying the accusation was "lying".  Kraft's lawyers say they have some sort of tape where the cop says this stuff.

 

It's amazing how readily you believe everything from Bobby's side.  No, wait a minute, it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

I can’t speak for everyone but I think it has  more to do with the arrogance of Kraft. Most fans on this board are biased because of football, but if they felt that he was a decent guy I don’t think the snarkiness would be as thick. 

For me that's more the issue not that he committed some heinous crime but that he thinks he's above the law and can buy himself out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Congrats.

 

 

It's amazing how readily you believe everything from Bobby's side.  No, wait a minute, it's not.

 

 

LOL--read the article for yourself doc.  Help yourself for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

I can’t speak for everyone but I think it has  more to do with the arrogance of Kraft. Most fans on this board are biased because of football, but if they felt that he was a decent guy I don’t think the snarkiness would be as thick. 

What difference does being arrogant or not or a jerk or not or arsehole or not when it applies to how the law is applied? It shouldn't be surprising that someone who has the resources to buy a franchise in pro sports (any pro sport) might likely be arrogant. Is there a need to go through the ranks to come up with some owners who might not be likeable.  Many people in his financial strata don't have the common touch. Again, what does that have to do how the law should be applied to them?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

Why do you do this to yourself? Lol

 

Remind me again who was the one who claimed he was vomiting forth what others were feeding him?

 

31 minutes ago, JohnC said:

What difference does being arrogant or not or a jerk or not or arsehole or not when it applies to how the law is applied? It shouldn't be surprising that someone who has the resources to buy a franchise in pro sports (any pro sport) might likely be arrogant. Is there a need to go through the ranks to come up with some owners who might not be likeable.  Many people in his financial strata don't have the common touch. Again, what does that have to do how the law should be applied to them?  

 

Not exactly true, as he certainly received the "common touch."

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Yep. Robert Kraft is a phony son of a b**ch. Spare me the rhetoric about how his philanthropic activities prove he’s a decent guy. I don’t think there’s a decent bone in his inebriated body. 

He’s old and his wife died. Let him live, so says my terrible friend who likes the Pats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Remind me again who was the one who claimed he was vomiting forth what others were feeding him?

 

 

 

 

No, really.  Just read the article. 

 

I'm trying to help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, JohnC said:

What difference does being arrogant or not or a jerk or not or arsehole or not when it applies to how the law is applied? It shouldn't be surprising that someone who has the resources to buy a franchise in pro sports (any pro sport) might likely be arrogant. Is there a need to go through the ranks to come up with some owners who might not be likeable.  Many people in his financial strata don't have the common touch. Again, what does that have to do how the law should be applied to them?  

It doesn’t have anything to do with how the law is applied. The post - at least i thought - was about him being humiliated and why anyone would want someone to have to deal with that.  I’m not surprised at all that some think he should be faced with humiliation based on how he acts. Schefter said on the radio today that he believes he’s done nothing wrong and is above whatever they are trying to charge him with. Well if that’s the case, why you in court bro? 

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

It doesn’t have anything to do with how the law is applied. The post - at least i thought - was about him being humiliated and why anyone would want someone to have to deal with that.  I’m not surprised at all that some think he should be faced with humiliation based on how he acts. Schefter said on the radio today that he believes he’s done nothing wrong and is above whatever they are trying to charge him with. Well if that’s the case, why you in court bro? 

 

:lol:
 

Opinions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

:lol:
 

Opinions...

I should rephrase - Schefter said that Kraft believes that Kraft has done nothing wrong. There is a video that says otherwise. But he believes he can suppress it, so that he can remain “innocent” 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I should rephrase - Schefter said that Kraft believes that Kraft has done nothing wrong. There is a video that says otherwise. But he believes he can suppress it, so that he can remain “innocent” 

 

No, I know what he meant.  It's stupid because he was caught breaking the law, so he has done something wrong.  Just because there's a possibility he could get off on a technicality, again one that wasn't the reason why he broke the law, doesn't change the fact that he's not innocent in real life.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

No, I know what he meant.  It's stupid because he was caught breaking the law, so he has done something wrong.  Just because there's a possibility he could get off on a technicality, again one that wasn't the reason why he broke the law, doesn't change the fact that he's not innocent in real life.

Right but that just shows how arrogant he is. He thinks we are all just that stupid. We should believe what his lawyers say, because of who he is. Just like we should believe that his employees with the deflator were trying to lose weight. It’s absurd how he thinks. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...