[Misleading Title] NFL Network David Carr 3 Team Trade we get Fournette

[WideRightRevenge]

https://sports.yahoo.com/trade-fits-jacksonville-jaguars-running-010637182.html

 

Thoughts ... me I'll take this all day long ... although he gets injured I'll take a much younger RB that my have a chip on his shoulder post JAX.

[Coach Tuesday]

Why wouldn't the Eagles just swap Foles for Fournette straight up?  Not sure how McCoy helps this get done.

[CommonCents]

Yikes. Dunkirk quality coming from Carr. It’s silly season.

[nucci]

an injury prone RB who basically quit last season? 

[WideRightRevenge]

9 minutes ago, nucci said:

an injury prone RB who basically quit last season? 

 

Optimistically thinking Jerome Bettis 2.0 .. check out his year 3 before going to Pitt

 

Year	Age	Tm	Pos	No.	G	GS	Rush	Yds	TD	Lng	Y/A	Y/G	A/G	Tgt	Rec	Yds	Y/R	TD	Lng	R/G	Y/G	Ctch%	Touch	Y/Tch	YScm	RRTD	Fmb	AV
Career					192	153	3479	13662	91	71	3.9	71.2	18.1	281	200	1449	7.2	3	34	1.0	7.5		3679	4.1
1993*+	21	RAM	RB	36	16	12	294	1429	7	71	4.9	89.3	18.4	34	26	244	9.4	0	28	1.6	15.3	76.5%	320	5.2	1673	7	4	12
1994*	22	RAM	RB	36	16	16	319	1025	3	19	3.2	64.1	19.9	45	31	293	9.5	1	34	1.9	18.3	68.9%	350	3.8	1318	4	5	8
1995	23	STL	RB	36	15	13	183	637	3	41	3.5	42.5	12.2	23	18	106	5.9	0	19	1.2	7.1	78.3%	201	3.7	743	3	4	4
1996*+	24	PIT	RB	36	16	12	320	1431	11	50	4.5	89.4	20.0	32	22	122	5.5	0	16	1.4	7.6	68.8%	342	4.5	1553	11	7	11
1997*	25	PIT	RB	36	15	15	375	1665	7	34	4.4	111.0	25.0	24	15	110	7.3	2	19	1.0	7.3	62.5%	390	4.6	1775	9	6	15
1998	26	PIT	RB	36	15	15	316	1185	3	42	3.8	79.0	21.1	23	16	90	5.6	0	26	1.1	6.0	69.6%	332	3.8	1275	3	2	6
1999	27	PIT	RB	36	16	16	299	1091	7	35	3.6	68.2	18.7	28	21	110	5.2	0	17	1.3	6.9	75.0%	320	3.8	1201	7	2	9
2000	28	PIT	RB	36	16	16	355	1341	8	30	3.8	83.8	22.2	19	13	97	7.5	0	25	0.8	6.1	68.4%	368	3.9	1438	8	1	10
2001*	29	PIT	RB	36	11	11	225	1072	4	48	4.8	97.5	20.5	10	8	48	6.0	0	16	0.7	4.4	80.0%	233	4.8	1120	4	3	8
2002	30	PIT	RB	36	13	11	187	666	9	41	3.6	51.2	14.4	9	7	57	8.1	0	15	0.5	4.4	77.8%	194	3.7	723	9	1	5
2003	31	PIT	RB	36	16	10	246	811	7	21	3.3	50.7	15.4	22	13	86	6.6	0	16	0.8	5.4	59.1%	259	3.5	897	7	5	4
2004*	32	PIT	rb	36	15	6	250	941	13	29	3.8	62.7	16.7	8	6	46	7.7	0	20	0.4	3.1	75.0%	256	3.9	987	13	1	7
2005	33	PIT		36	12	0	110	368	9	39	3.3	30.7	9.2	4	4	40	10.0	0	16	0.3	3.3	100.0%	114	3.6	408	9	0	3

[BillsFan1988]

If this trade was available to the Bills they should do it.  McCoy is finished and needs to be traded or even released.  He alluded contact last yr and that's a major sign of a RB in decline. He also didn't seem to have that burst to get around the corner on a consistent basis. I realize our oline was bad but they weren't this bad . McCoy in his prime would of had easy 1200 yds behind those guys.

[Chandler#81]

[This is an automated response]

 

The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.

 

Thank you.

[Captain_Quint]

8 minutes ago, WideRightRevenge said:

 

Optimistically thinking Jerome Bettis 2.0 .. check out his year 3 before going to Pitt

 

Year	Age	Tm	Pos	No.	G	GS	Rush	Yds	TD	Lng	Y/A	Y/G	A/G	Tgt	Rec	Yds	Y/R	TD	Lng	R/G	Y/G	Ctch%	Touch	Y/Tch	YScm	RRTD	Fmb	AV
Career					192	153	3479	13662	91	71	3.9	71.2	18.1	281	200	1449	7.2	3	34	1.0	7.5		3679	4.1
1993*+	21	RAM	RB	36	16	12	294	1429	7	71	4.9	89.3	18.4	34	26	244	9.4	0	28	1.6	15.3	76.5%	320	5.2	1673	7	4	12
1994*	22	RAM	RB	36	16	16	319	1025	3	19	3.2	64.1	19.9	45	31	293	9.5	1	34	1.9	18.3	68.9%	350	3.8	1318	4	5	8
1995	23	STL	RB	36	15	13	183	637	3	41	3.5	42.5	12.2	23	18	106	5.9	0	19	1.2	7.1	78.3%	201	3.7	743	3	4	4
1996*+	24	PIT	RB	36	16	12	320	1431	11	50	4.5	89.4	20.0	32	22	122	5.5	0	16	1.4	7.6	68.8%	342	4.5	1553	11	7	11
1997*	25	PIT	RB	36	15	15	375	1665	7	34	4.4	111.0	25.0	24	15	110	7.3	2	19	1.0	7.3	62.5%	390	4.6	1775	9	6	15
1998	26	PIT	RB	36	15	15	316	1185	3	42	3.8	79.0	21.1	23	16	90	5.6	0	26	1.1	6.0	69.6%	332	3.8	1275	3	2	6
1999	27	PIT	RB	36	16	16	299	1091	7	35	3.6	68.2	18.7	28	21	110	5.2	0	17	1.3	6.9	75.0%	320	3.8	1201	7	2	9
2000	28	PIT	RB	36	16	16	355	1341	8	30	3.8	83.8	22.2	19	13	97	7.5	0	25	0.8	6.1	68.4%	368	3.9	1438	8	1	10
2001*	29	PIT	RB	36	11	11	225	1072	4	48	4.8	97.5	20.5	10	8	48	6.0	0	16	0.7	4.4	80.0%	233	4.8	1120	4	3	8
2002	30	PIT	RB	36	13	11	187	666	9	41	3.6	51.2	14.4	9	7	57	8.1	0	15	0.5	4.4	77.8%	194	3.7	723	9	1	5
2003	31	PIT	RB	36	16	10	246	811	7	21	3.3	50.7	15.4	22	13	86	6.6	0	16	0.8	5.4	59.1%	259	3.5	897	7	5	4
2004*	32	PIT	rb	36	15	6	250	941	13	29	3.8	62.7	16.7	8	6	46	7.7	0	20	0.4	3.1	75.0%	256	3.9	987	13	1	7
2005	33	PIT		36	12	0	110	368	9	39	3.3	30.7	9.2	4	4	40	10.0	0	16	0.3	3.3	100.0%	114	3.6	408	9	0	3

Interesting........

[WideRightRevenge]

6 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

[This is an automated response]

 

The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.

 

Thank you.

 

Not sure I understand .. but added NFL Network .. is that sufficient?

[SDS]

[This is an automated response]

 

The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.

 

Thank you.

26 minutes ago, WideRightRevenge said:

 

Not sure I understand .. but added NFL Network .. is that sufficient?

 

No. Your title makes it sound like it actually happened