Big Turk Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Guess the truth really hurts! In Buffalo the guy would have received a raise and a promotion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 On 1/31/2019 at 2:26 PM, NoHuddleKelly12 said: Both “known” and “cheater.” I think this guy might have a wrongful termination case to talk to somebody about. It's why he was suspended, and I believe fined, for crying out loud. Look, punish the guy. Suspend the guy. Suspend him without pay. It wasn't very professional, but considering it wasn't actionable to end the guys employment is a little harsh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 2 hours ago, dollars 2 donuts said: It's why he was suspended, and I believe fined, for crying out loud. Look, punish the guy. Suspend the guy. Suspend him without pay. It wasn't very professional, but considering it wasn't actionable to end the guys employment is a little harsh. Exactly Donuts. Which is why maybe the same fine folks at tmz sports who seem to be able to get surveillance video (whilst the NFL's crack security teams wander about in a fog of cluelessnes), could look into whether or not the boss of this former employee is a Patriots fan? Just sayin'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 On 2/1/2019 at 10:04 AM, BuffaloHokie13 said: Why was he suspended for 4 games? Mostly because he destroyed evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr Almighty Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 On 2/1/2019 at 9:50 AM, Freddie's Dead said: Hilarious to us, but serious business to the TV station. Marcia could sue for definition of character, and she'd likely win. Firing the employee was strictly to mitigate damages. What exactly is this? And what does it mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 4 hours ago, Starr Almighty said: What exactly is this? And what does it mean? It's a M*A*SH reference, where Frank talks about suing someone who badmouthed him, and Hawkeye says, "No doubt for definition (not defamation) of character". Laughs ensue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr Almighty Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 11 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said: It's a M*A*SH reference, where Frank talks about suing someone who badmouthed him, and Hawkeye says, "No doubt for definition (not defamation) of character". Laughs ensue. Ahhh....got it ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts