bigfootindy Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Very early, just hypothetical trade. Maybe the Raiders want a QB before the Broncos/Dolphins have a shot. Trade chart shows: Bills 9th: 1350 Raiders picks: 740 + 680 = 1420 (About a 5% premium) Thoughts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) I’d do it Would need a little bit more though. Plus 10% sounds about right. With it, I'd take the TE and then BPA Edited January 17, 2019 by Virgil 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rc2catch Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) Nope.. I want a extra 2 this year or a 1 next year on top of both those 1’s Gruden can afford it Edited January 17, 2019 by Rc2catch 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Is that for their two later first rounds? Definitely. Do that trade and then take whichever WR tickles the fancy, and Fant. Or a Lineman. Either way, the sweet spot of our biggest needs (WR, TE, OL, RB) is starting at pick 20 and moving back. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 So can you tell me who is going to still be there at 9 so I can evaluate? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) Why do some people still think the Raiders are looking to replace Carr? After a rough start he went 10 straight games without an INT before throwing a couple in the season finale. There's no way a QB will be sitting at 9 who will ever be better than Carr in this bad QB year. Edited January 17, 2019 by Albany,n.y. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) I think it may cost more than just their 24 and 27th to move from the mid 20's all the way to top 10. Anyway I say no, need more compensation, if not then a definite no for me. Rather stay at 9. Edited January 17, 2019 by Patrick_Duffy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 I voted in a heartbeat even though they can get a great player at 9. I’m thinking 24 and 27 would get you something like Dre’Mont Jones and Hollywood Brown. I think that’s better than Gary or someone like that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark92 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) Well if you look at the #10 pick we gave to KC for the #27 and the following years 1st in 2017 then it may not be quite enough. I would do #9 for #24, #27 and a 2nd rounder. Turn 1 top ten pick into 3 probable starters. Yep. Edited January 17, 2019 by Mark92 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 5 minutes ago, Mark92 said: Well if you look at the #10 pick we gave to KC for the #27 and the following years 1st in 2017 then it may not be quite enough. I would do #9 for #24, #27 and a 2nd rounder. Turn 1 top ten pick into 3 probable starters. Yep. you're hired ! mathematically it works for me. Can likely move back up if need something too good to miss on. But , I would want more considering there might be leverage. the thing i cannot do is measure the BPA level and look at "need" picks , and consider what the Bills see of value there as compared to what the see from the first ten picks look like. am sure some here can give us and educated opinion. as i mentioned the math works well enough. But they best have some players they really like and can get to if they trade out. Hard to give up drafting in the top ten !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 54 minutes ago, Rc2catch said: Nope.. I want a extra 2 this year or a 1 next year on top of both those 1’s Gruden can afford it If you can get it sure not sure I'd say no to the other if you can't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RPbillsfan Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Fair trade factoring in a top 10 pick gets a 5 yr deal there would be a premium. Let's say a 3rd round pick which would be the 68th pick. We would be drafting 24, 27, 40, 64, 74 in the first three rounds. Plus have two picks in the 4th, 5th and 7th and one in the 6th. If we add a WR, OG, C, T and TE and maybe an OLB in free agency we could draft: 24 - Hakeem Butler - WR 27 - Dexter Lawrence - DT 40 - Irv Smith - TE 64 - Youdny Cajuste - OT 70 - Chris Lidstrom then in 4th round LB Kahil Hodge and RB Josh Jacobs thoughts please 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 4 minutes ago, RPbillsfan said: Fair trade factoring in a top 10 pick gets a 5 yr deal there would be a premium. Let's say a 3rd round pick which would be the 68th pick. We would be drafting 24, 27, 40, 64, 74 in the first three rounds. Plus have two picks in the 4th, 5th and 7th and one in the 6th. If we add a WR, OG, C, T and TE and maybe an OLB in free agency we could draft: 24 - Hakeem Butler - WR 27 - Dexter Lawrence - DT 40 - Irv Smith - TE 64 - Youdny Cajuste - OT 70 - Chris Lidstrom then in 4th round LB Kahil Hodge and RB Josh Jacobs thoughts please Unless something drastic happens, there is no way Jacobs is there in the 4th round. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RPbillsfan Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 1 minute ago, njbuff said: Unless something drastic happens, there is no way Jacobs is there in the 4th round. Probably not, but maybe a Bryce Love who is coming off an injury or the kid from Texas A & M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, RPbillsfan said: Probably not, but maybe a Bryce Love who is coming off an injury or the kid from Texas A & M I don’t know how RB is going to work in this draft or how the Bills plan on fixing the RB position, but if the Bills are fancy on Jacobs, they might be busy this draft with trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 While the points add up a 3rd pick in the later rounds required to seal the deal. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD Hill Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 8 minutes ago, RPbillsfan said: Probably not, but maybe a Bryce Love who is coming off an injury or the kid from Texas A & M Agree Jacobs may go in the first but Love might be there and a great pick. Especially if we actually keep Shady this year. Love will have a year of RB by committee and then take over in 2020. Sign me up for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 42 minutes ago, Mark92 said: Well if you look at the #10 pick we gave to KC for the #27 and the following years 1st in 2017 then it may not be quite enough. I would do #9 for #24, #27 and a 2nd rounder. Turn 1 top ten pick into 3 probable starters. Yep. They did this for their QB of the future (boy, did theirs come early!). I really don't think there's anyone at 9 the Raiders will want. If anything, I could see Gruden trading the Cards for the #1 pick to get Bosa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 I would do that. Draft 2 o-linemen. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Can I see the Bills draft board first? OK, I’d probably do it unless they LOVE someone at 9. Can I see the draft board now? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts