Buffalo_Gal Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: What's amazing is how limited their response was. They delivered a response to the speech they THOUGHT Trump was going to give, or the speech they WANTED Trump to give. Instead, Trump delivered a fact based speech which - instead of rewriting their response to mirror what was actually said - Chuck and Nancy ignored and responded to ghosts instead. Why? Because they have no ability to negotiate or move off their position due to the prog-left holding them hostage. It's great to see. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: What's amazing is how limited their response was. They delivered a response to the speech they THOUGHT Trump was going to give, or the speech they WANTED Trump to give. Instead, Trump delivered a fact based speech which - instead of rewriting their response to mirror what was actually said - Chuck and Nancy ignored and responded to ghosts instead. Why? Because they have no ability to negotiate or move off their position due to the prog-left holding them hostage. It's great to see. I think this shutdown is throwing Nancy for a loop... she is so used to the kabuki theater in which the GOPe pretends to be strong and offer "opposition" to Democratic legislation before they cave in (every stinkin' time) that she is off her game with President Trump. It will be mighty interesting to see how this plays out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: What's amazing is how limited their response was. They delivered a response to the speech they THOUGHT Trump was going to give, or the speech they WANTED Trump to give. Instead, Trump delivered a fact based speech which - instead of rewriting their response to mirror what was actually said - Chuck and Nancy ignored and responded to ghosts instead. Why? Because they have no ability to negotiate or move off their positionplen due to the prog-left holding them hostage. It's great to see. Plenz must now be a Trump supporter due to the facts provided...no? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 44 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Because they have no ability to negotiate or move off their position due to the prog-left holding them hostage. I strongly dispute Pelosi is being held hostage by anyone. She has a long history of this nonsense - if anything, she's holding everyone else hostage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: I strongly dispute Pelosi is being held hostage by anyone. She has a long history of this nonsense - if anything, she's holding everyone else hostage. If she’s holding people hostage then violence is appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 On 1/9/2019 at 10:30 AM, Foxx said: 1906 English language requirement Procedural safeguards for naturalization were enacted. Knowledge of English was made a basic requirement. resource California Poll The latest telephone poll taken by the California Governor's office, asked whether people who live in California think illegal immigration is a serious problem: 29% of respondents answered: "Yes, it is a serious problem." 71% of respondents answered: "No es una problema seriosa." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I strongly dispute Pelosi is being held hostage by anyone. She has a long history of this nonsense - if anything, she's holding everyone else hostage. She does have a history of nonsense - she also has a history of being politically savvy. This is a losing proposition for her and the left and she knows it. Yet she's going down with the ship because unlike her last tour as speaker she can't get the dems in a room and whip them into shape. There are too many progressives now who barely voted for her leadership and would be voted out by their prog-fascist base if they are seen as capitulating on "Trump's wall". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 I wonder if there is a California, New Mexico, Texas, etc study that correlates to this Arizona study? (55 pages long) Undocumented Immigrants, U.S. Citizens, and Convicted Criminals in Arizona John R. Lott Crime Prevention Research Center Date Written: February 10, 2018 AbstractUsing newly released detailed data on all prisoners who entered the Arizona state prison from January 1985 through June 2017, we are able to separate non-U.S. citizens by whether they are illegal or legal residents. Unlike other studies, these data do not rely on self-reporting of criminal backgrounds. Undocumented immigrants are at least 142% more likely to be convicted of a crime than other Arizonans. They also tend to commit more serious crimes and serve 10.5% longer sentences, more likely to be classified as dangerous, and 45% more likely to be gang members than U.S. citizens. </snip> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 On 1/9/2019 at 11:55 AM, Tiberius said: No, bigots just don't like people from "sh@@hole" countries Or the hills of W.Virginia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 10, 2019 Author Share Posted January 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, westside said: Or the hills of W.Virginia LOL, I noticed the GOP senator is wavering on Trump. Cutting off those food stamps must be terrifying to the people in WV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: She does have a history of nonsense - she also has a history of being politically savvy. This is a losing proposition for her and the left and she knows it. Yet she's going down with the ship because unlike her last tour as speaker she can't get the dems in a room and whip them into shape. There are too many progressives now who barely voted for her leadership and would be voted out by their prog-fascist base if they are seen as capitulating on "Trump's wall". There's a reason that one of the recent House rule changes was to eliminate the ability to have a vote of no confidence for the Speaker. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 2 hours ago, Koko78 said: There's a reason that one of the recent House rule changes was to eliminate the ability to have a vote of no confidence for the Speaker. Because she knows there are enough House Democrats willing to join with Republicans for a vote of no confidence to pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: LOL, I noticed the GOP senator is wavering on Trump. Cutting off those food stamps must be terrifying to the people in WV Who cares? They're just a bunch of deplorables. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 On 1/9/2019 at 4:24 PM, The_Dude said: Did people actually watch the address and if so, why? I watched because a Presidential address from the Oval Office holds the gravitas for everyone from MAGA hat wearers to the most acute cases of TDS to watch and consider the message. I also gave Chuck and Nancy the time for their rebuttal. But to be honest, their various ways of saying #orangemanbad have already been lost to me. All that I remember was the first few seconds, when I saw the two of them at the podium and thinking to myself how the Internet is going to tear that image of the two of them apart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: LOL, I noticed the GOP senator is wavering on Trump. Cutting off those food stamps must be terrifying to the people in WV Bad timing. It's past roadkill season... But hey...every West Virginian who starves to death is one less Trump supporter voting in 2020, right? We'll even call it "Dekulakization, y'all!" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Troller in Chief. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Troller in Chief. Does anyone else find it amusing that Acosta is now relegated to interviewing steel posts? Edited January 11, 2019 by Uncle Joe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts