Virgil Posted December 31, 2018 Author Share Posted December 31, 2018 Buffalorumblings just posted we are picking 9th 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 If the players grade out closely , other factors such as need come in. If a player remains on the board that you have graded much higher than the others you take him. Maybe even move up. Unless that player is an RB and it’s the first round. I’ve never loved the term BPA as it’s usually a massive oversimplification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 3 hours ago, wppete said: Jonah Williams or Ed Oliver. Jonah LT Dawkins RT Paradis C 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Updated from NFL.com has us picking #10 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001006117/article/2019-nfl-draft-order-cardinals-own-top-pick-giants-to-take-qb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterbluesky Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 3 hours ago, JaCrispy said: Top 10 pick? I’ll take it! ? What's it worth in trade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
from_dunkirk Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Virgil said: Buffalorumblings just posted we are picking 9th The Bills are picking 10th, per the NFL: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001006117/article/2019-nfl-draft-order-cardinals-own-top-pick-giants-to-take-qb Edited December 31, 2018 by from_dunkirk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerlyofCtown Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Manther said: I agree with that. I think how teams address a glaring need is to move around the board to line that need up with BPA unless some player is rated much higher than the slot the team is in then they will likely take thay upgrade. We did that last year with Edmonds. Edited December 31, 2018 by formerlyofCtown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo44 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 27 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: If the players grade out closely , other factors such as need come in. If a player remains on the board that you have graded much higher than the others you take him. Maybe even move up. Unless that player is an RB and it’s the first round. I’ve never loved the term BPA as it’s usually a massive oversimplification. Yes! I have made this point several times in the past but you do it more succinctly . Thank you. It’s a sliding scale. Need, all other things considered, does, indeed, factor in ...in a significant way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 This thread is more bi-polar than Nick Foles. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 23 minutes ago, wppete said: Updated from NFL.com has us picking #10 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001006117/article/2019-nfl-draft-order-cardinals-own-top-pick-giants-to-take-qb Wrong...as long as the Ind/Ten game isn't a tie we are 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocCityRoller Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 I believe it comes down to a coin flip Last time Denver picked one pick before Buffalo in the top 10 they got Von Miller, Buffalo got MD. I hope we win that coin flip... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted December 31, 2018 Author Share Posted December 31, 2018 3 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said: I believe it comes down to a coin flip Last time Denver picked one pick before Buffalo in the top 10 they got Von Miller, Buffalo got MD. I hope we win that coin flip... According to BuffaloRumblings, who said they spoke with someone at the NFL, it won't come down to a coin flip and it's officially going to be 9th 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beach Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 this thread has had the number changed a few times, maybe the word that needs to be changed is "officially" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 47 minutes ago, Virgil said: Buffalorumblings just posted we are picking 9th That’s awesome a CB or a RB with the 9th pick !!! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted December 31, 2018 Author Share Posted December 31, 2018 6 minutes ago, Beach said: this thread has had the number changed a few times, maybe the word that needs to be changed is "officially" In fairness, it was originally posted as 9th. I wasn’t the one who changed it 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
from_dunkirk Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Virgil said: According to BuffaloRumblings, who said they spoke with someone at the NFL, it won't come down to a coin flip and it's officially going to be 9th So you're saying NFL.com is wrong? Edited December 31, 2018 by from_dunkirk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted December 31, 2018 Author Share Posted December 31, 2018 Just now, from_dunkirk said: So you're saying NFL.com is wrong? NFL.com deleted their tweet. So yes, they were wrong 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
from_dunkirk Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 18 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: Wrong...as long as the Ind/Ten game isn't a tie we are 9 No, you are wrong. The NFL cannot be wrong. They are the horse's mouth. 1 minute ago, Virgil said: NFL.com deleted their tweet. So yes, they were wrong No, you are wrong. The article is still there: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001006117/article/2019-nfl-draft-order-cardinals-own-top-pick-giants-to-take-qb 3 minutes ago, Virgil said: In fairness, it was originally posted as 9th. I wasn’t the one who changed it But that was wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted December 31, 2018 Author Share Posted December 31, 2018 Just now, from_dunkirk said: No, you are wrong. The NFL cannot be wrong. They are the horse's mouth. No, you are wrong. The article is still there: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001006117/article/2019-nfl-draft-order-cardinals-own-top-pick-giants-to-take-qb Let’s make a wager shall we? Loser changes their avatar to Brady for a week? And I probably am wrong. No one seems to be able to figure it out. But I will say this, even Denver just tweeted that they are picking 10th..... 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 3 minutes ago, Virgil said: Let’s make a wager shall we? Loser changes their avatar to Brady for a week? And I probably am wrong. No one seems to be able to figure it out. But I will say this, even Denver just tweeted that they are picking 10th..... It's all good Virgil. Some sites are showing the "current" standings with the current SOS and others are doing the probable. It seems most know the SOS will change and they show the Bills at 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts