sleeby Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Why shouldn't the other party, who actually has the equity stake in the job, not be permitted the same leverage as the first party to the contract? Simple - because you eventually end up with end game capitalism - the US today as an obvious example. In other words, it doesn't work is why. Giving the company the rights of a person is fantastic for companies and so for the markets. The markets doing well is fantastic for the wealthy. The companies are part of the society and need to be kept from destroying it when it might become monetarily beneficial for it to do so. Again, see the US - the markets are high and the rich are.filthy. about 50% of the US does not have $2k in savings much less.inbesting in the stock market. Assuming we care about the future of the USA then who's health should we concern ourselves with - the people working the jobs and payimg taxes or the billionaires who own the companies and pay less and leas taxes every decade? I say the people or bust. The alternative is the bad place. I'm out. This is a football forum and a Friday night. You take last word. Ciao. Edit - sorry about all the grammatical problems above. Let's agree to blame the phone. . . Edited November 9, 2018 by sleeby 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 7 hours ago, The Real Buffalo Joe said: Don't care what the state is. Strictly from an ethical standpoint. Depends on what the homeowner knew. Was it dark ? Did the Police identify themselves? Could a reasonable person have feared for their life ? So many factors in that hypothetical. From an ethical standpoint, the Police have to be given an advantage. It is possible there could be circumstances in your scenario where it may be justified though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 (edited) On 10/31/2018 at 7:20 AM, sleeby said: "In my state, I can be terminated for any reason at any time, as long as it is not discriminatory. " Do You say this as though it's a good thing? If true then your state is a disgrace. Vote wisely next week would be my advice. Of course it's a good thing. WTF do you think happens to organizations where crappy employees can't be fired? Let me guess....you can't figure out why governments are wasteful and unproductive. Edited November 10, 2018 by KD in CA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol Dirty B Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 This thread has wandered off into some random *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boca BIlls Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 This doesnt seem as interesting as I thought It would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrbojanglezs Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 12 hours ago, sleeby said: Simple - because you eventually end up with end game capitalism - the US today as an obvious example. In other words, it doesn't work is why. Giving the company the rights of a person is fantastic for companies and so for the markets. The markets doing well is fantastic for the wealthy. The companies are part of the society and need to be kept from destroying it when it might become monetarily beneficial for it to do so. Again, see the US - the markets are high and the rich are.filthy. about 50% of the US does not have $2k in savings much less.inbesting in the stock market. Assuming we care about the future of the USA then who's health should we concern ourselves with - the people working the jobs and payimg taxes or the billionaires who own the companies and pay less and leas taxes every decade? I say the people or bust. The alternative is the bad place. I'm out. This is a football forum and a Friday night. You take last word. Ciao. Edit - sorry about all the grammatical problems above. Let's agree to blame the phone. . . Here comes the socialism talk ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 So Reid was claiming he was tested constantly and turns out he wasn’t 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Eric Reid has been proven to be a liar now by not only the NFL but also the NFLPA that works for him. What a piece of work this guy is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 11/9/2018 at 6:16 PM, sleeby said: Simple - because you eventually end up with end game capitalism - the US today as an obvious example. In other words, it doesn't work is why. Giving the company the rights of a person is fantastic for companies and so for the markets. The markets doing well is fantastic for the wealthy. The companies are part of the society and need to be kept from destroying it when it might become monetarily beneficial for it to do so. Again, see the US - the markets are high and the rich are.filthy. about 50% of the US does not have $2k in savings much less.inbesting in the stock market. Assuming we care about the future of the USA then who's health should we concern ourselves with - the people working the jobs and payimg taxes or the billionaires who own the companies and pay less and leas taxes every decade? I say the people or bust. The alternative is the bad place. I'm out. This is a football forum and a Friday night. You take last word. Ciao. Edit - sorry about all the grammatical problems above. Let's agree to blame the phone. . . Typical socialist - always the victim ? 23 minutes ago, aristocrat said: So Reid was claiming he was tested constantly and turns out he wasn’t That 7 times story was bupkis? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boca BIlls Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 10/30/2018 at 1:57 PM, matter2003 said: Eric Reid gave a more in depth interview about his whole break from the Players Coalition...in it he mentioned Terry Pegula by name and claims he said the kneeling situation was out of hand and it was costing him sponsors and they needed to make it go away and to throw some money at it if thats what it took. Interesting how behind the scenes politics really work...we all know the owners are all about their money but its interesting when things come out that show it... This isnt really interesting since every company does this... throw money at problems to try and make them go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcampbell104 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 one thing these posts are good for, they tell you who all the racist are 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoPar_v2 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 10/30/2018 at 2:01 PM, 26CornerBlitz said: FYI: Thank you 26. This is old news. Pegula’s same statements were also reported in a book about the league released in September. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 13 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Typical socialist - always the victim ? That 7 times story was bupkis? yea apparently the nflpa looked into it and he was tested the same as everyone else. did he not think they would look into? i thought for sure the nfl was going after him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, tcampbell104 said: one thing these posts are good for, they tell you who all the racist are Eric Reid lied. Michael Bennett lied. wake up. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said: Eric Reid lied. Michael Bennett lied. wake up. Cant argue with this. This has nothing to do with race. Either they lied or they didn’t. Some people have to make everything about race. Sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyBatty is alive Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 10/31/2018 at 6:37 AM, Ol Dirty B said: So eh... your job isn't an NFL athlete. I understand the company you work for may have rules against it. The NFL, they don't. So you're comparing apples to oranges. I feel like the people who make this point are people who just disagree with some players and want an easy way to silence them You are wrong, even anything the NFL has more rules for players than a "typical" employee. https://static.nfl.com/static/content/public/photo/2017/08/11/0ap3000000828506.pdf And that doesn't even bring up conduct written into specific contracts on a one on one basis/ 25 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said: Eric Reid lied. Michael Bennett lied. wake up. Micheal Bennett clearly lied and has never been held accountable. The Vegas Police should have sued him tio death. And the "brave" Pete Carroll also through the Vegas police under the bus, he was never held accountable either, 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: yea apparently the nflpa looked into it and he was tested the same as everyone else. did he not think they would look into? i thought for sure the nfl was going after him. Interesting- seems like based on some articles out there even Rivera got dragged into the lie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyBatty is alive Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 11/9/2018 at 10:24 AM, The Real Buffalo Joe said: Hypothetically, and this hasn't happened yet to my knowledge. But if the police do a no knock raid on the wrong house, if the homeowner heard people breaking in, grabbed his gun, and shot an officer, would that be justifiable? In most states, If the Cop did not properly identify themselves as police yes that would be justifiable. You have some radical states where effectively you arent allowed to defend yourself discharging a firearm, even in your own home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcampbell104 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, wppete said: Cant argue with this. This has nothing to do with race. Either they lied or they didn’t. Some people have to make everything about race. Sad. like i said you can tell who the racist are 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 34 minutes ago, tcampbell104 said: like i said you can tell who the racist are 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts