Jump to content

Proud Boys: Patriots or Fascists?


The_Dude

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

:lol: The guy at the ten second mark does a Michael Jackson spin move on the table. Why? 'Cause he knew it looked cool. 

 

Haven't seen a spin like that since the Roman Senate was convinced by Milo to recall Cicero from exile...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The_Dude said:

 

 

I may may not know about boat war. But I worship the Romans and I’m a subject matter expert in Roman things because I am such a student of warfare. I can name more Roman politicians than Americans. I know the late republic better than you, and you’re wrong. You couldn’t be more wrong. 

 

2kpusu.jpg

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

:lol: The guy at the ten second mark does a Michael Jackson spin move on the table. Why? 'Cause he knew it looked cool. 

Thought the same thing. Table should have lit up like the sidewalk in Billie jean 

Edited by Kevbeau
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, The_Dude said:

 

...I’ll bite. How does one answer the question? Because it seems like you’re wanting a survey on political violence dating back to the Bronze Age. 

 

 

Actually no.  My statement was very plain & simple.  And you still haven't properly responded.  Just because some things happened in the past, doesn't mean there's a place for them in the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

The Lex Agraria?  The redistribution of public land from the oligarch to the plebians financed by money from Pergamon? 

 

Lex Agraria, the economic policy?  

 

Call it economic. Call it social justice. Call it whatever the ***** yup want. And way to go on finding out about Pergamon. That decree followed by the challenge to the senate, from the Assembly(ies) set years of civil war into motion.

 

And the elites were squatting. That’s what happened. It was a good piece of legislation that brought down the senate because they refused to budge even a little and in a few years their greed left them impotent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

Call it economic. Call it social justice. Call it whatever the ***** yup want. And way to go on finding out about Pergamon. That decree followed by the challenge to the senate, from the Assembly(ies) set years of civil war into motion.

 

And the elites were squatting. That’s what happened. It was a good piece of legislation that brought down the senate because they refused to budge even a little and in a few years their greed left them impotent. 

 

Which you're evading the topic of conversation: you still haven't named a single instance of historical political violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

No. I did. You’re an idiot. Franz Ferdinand then. 

 

No, you didn't.  You admitted it was economic.  You specifically said "call it economic."

 

The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand resulted from pan-Slavic social pressures.  It wasn't a political decision, it was a social one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No, you didn't.  You admitted it was economic.  You specifically said "call it economic."

 

The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand resulted from pan-Slavic social pressures.  It wasn't a political decision, it was a social one.

 

Arent you splitting hairs. 

 

Legislation isnt political according to Tom. Neither are politically motivated assasinations. Amazing. 

 

Must be nice to be able to move the goal posts to wherever you need them. 

 

Tom, you may be the smartest, dumb-kid, I’ve come across. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

Arent you splitting hairs. 

 

Legislation isnt political according to Tom. Neither are politically motivated assasinations. Amazing. 

 

Must be nice to be able to move the goal posts to wherever you need them. 

 

Tom, you may be the smartest, dumb-kid, I’ve come across. 

 

See the source image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

See the source image

 

Of course you’d show up to defend the honor of your boyfriend. 

 

Youre not not nearly as annoying when replying in GIFs. 

 

My god, your pompous writing style makes me wanna put bleach in my eyes. Do all incells write like you? My guess is probably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

Of course you’d show up to defend the honor of your boyfriend. 

 

Youre not not nearly as annoying when replying in GIFs. 

 

My god, your pompous writing style makes me wanna put bleach in my eyes. Do all incells write like you? My guess is probably. 

 

You don't even understand what's happening to you right now.

 

This is so comical it hurts.

 

Please, keep going...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

You don't even understand what's happening to you right now.

 

This is so comical it hurts.

 

Please, keep going...

 

No, he understands.  And he's wilfully complicit in it anyway.

 

It's stunning.

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

 

Arent you splitting hairs. 

 

Legislation isnt political according to Tom. Neither are politically motivated assasinations. Amazing.

 

Gracchus' murder was based in socio-economics.  Ferdinand's was caused by social unrest.  Neither was the result of stupid political decisions.

 

Name one - just one - instance of violence caused by political decisions.  Just one.  G'head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Which you're evading the topic of conversation: you still haven't named a single instance of historical political violence.

 

You didn't see that video of the Ugandan Parliament brawl? Oh wait, you said historical not hysterical, never mind.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2018 at 2:17 PM, DC Tom said:

 

No, he understands.  And he's wilfully complicit in it anyway.

 

It's stunning.

 

Gracchus' murder was based in socio-economics.  Ferdinand's was caused by social unrest.  Neither was the result of stupid political decisions.

 

Name one - just one - instance of violence caused by political decisions.  Just one.  G'head.

 

What is it that you’d say the word “politics” encompasses? 

 

Idiot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...